Jump to content
Gay Guides Forum
reader

Arrest warrant issued for US academic under ban on insulting royalty

Recommended Posts

Posted

From The BBC

A Thai court has issued an arrest warrant for an American academic under Thailand's lese-majeste law that forbids insulting the monarchy.

The army filed a complaint against Paul Chambers, a lecturer at Naresuan University in central Thailand, under lese-majeste and computer crime laws, according to his legal representation.

Mr Chambers and his lawyer are due to report to police on Tuesday, where charges are expected to be filed.

Akarachai Chaimaneekarakate, advocacy lead for the Thai Lawyers for Human Rights Centre representing Mr Chambers, told the BBC he did not know the reason for the complaint.

If convicted, Mr Chambers could face three to 15 years in prison for each lese-majeste count.

Posted

From AFP

Thailand revokes visa of US academic charged with royal insult

A US academic charged with breaking Thailand's strict royal defamation laws was granted bail on Wednesday, his lawyers said, but remains in custody pending an appeal to immigration authorities who earlier revoked his visa.

Paul Chambers, who has spent over a decade teaching Southeast Asian politics at a Thai university, was arrested on Tuesday after reporting to police to answer a charge of lese-majeste.

His case is a rare instance of a foreigner falling foul of strict laws which shield King Maha Vajiralongkorn and his close family from any criticism and can lead to decades-long prison sentences.

"The Appeal Court... issued an order granting bail for Paul," said a post on X from the Thai Lawyers for Human Rights group (TLHR) representing Chambers.

"Paul will remain in custody at Phitsanulok Provincial Prison until the result of the bail request from immigration police is known."

His lawyer Wannaphat Jenroumjit earlier told AFP that immigration authorities had visited Chambers in detention and informed him his visa had been revoked.

Wannaphat said Chambers was "not confident but remains hopeful" in the Thai justice system.

The Thai military filed a complaint against Chambers this year over an article linked to a think-tank website which focuses on Southeast Asian politics.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/international-relations/thailand-revokes-visa-of-us-academic-charged-with-royal-insult/ar-AA1CAEVD

Posted

I can only imagine how this is going to play out, in light of:

- the current Trump tariffs,

- and the recent anger of Marco Rubio from the State Department, about Thailand sending back against their will the 40 Uyghurs to China.

The Thai government sure has a way of upsetting the apple cart.

 

Posted

Seeing articles about this case from other non-thai sources I think that we are best to be circumspect with our comments(not least for the sake of this forum).

I have decided not to add links to those articles, although Mr Google will doubtless assist.

Posted
9 hours ago, khaolakguy said:

Seeing articles about this case from other non-thai sources I think that we are best to be circumspect with our comments(not least for the sake of this forum).

I have decided not to add links to those articles, although Mr Google will doubtless assist.

at least we now understand better how , say authoritarians ,  are managing to silence their people

  • Members
Posted
18 hours ago, reader said:

From AFP

Thailand revokes visa of US academic charged with royal insult

A US academic charged with breaking Thailand's strict royal defamation laws was granted bail on Wednesday, his lawyers said, but remains in custody ...

That's an oxymoron. If you're granted bail, you're not in custody. My understanding is that he didn't insult the King, but rather criticized military funding/propriety.

Posted
1 hour ago, unicorn said:

That's an oxymoron. If you're granted bail, you're not in custody. My understanding is that he didn't insult the King, but rather criticized military funding/propriety.

Oxymoron  indeed. The original report in paper,

 

The army filed the complaint against Mr Chambers for "defamation, contempt or malice" towards the royal family, "importing false computer data" in a way "likely to damage national security or cause public panic", and disseminating computer data "that may affect national security",

 

 

Sort of catch all! Fairly typical.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...