Field Study of Parrots in Thailand

[Guest lvdkeyes]

He may well have existed. Whether he was who he said he was is another story.

 

If you go back to post #15, you will see this is what I said. I don't see the point in repeating what others have said without adding anything to it.

[Guest fountainhall]

If you go back to post #15, you will see this is what I said. I don't see the point in repeating what others have said without adding anything to it.

Isn't that what parrots do?

[Guest lvdkeyes]

A parrot has a bird brain.

[Guest fountainhall]

A parrot has a bird brain.

Precisely my point.

[Guest lvdkeyes]

How did I guess that?

[Guest fountainhall]

And in the hands of John Cleese and the Monty Python team, one particular parrot came to a decidedly premature end. After many divorces, I hear John Cleese is in the market for consultancy work - any kind of work

[Guest beachlover]

If you go back to post #15, you will see this is what I said. I don't see the point in repeating what others have said without adding anything to it.

 

Oh geez... we're still doing this?

 

I can't remember if I repeated it or just missed your post. I certainly added something to it, regardless.

 

But if it makes you happy to have a snipe with your bum chum every now and then...

[Guest lvdkeyes]

Bum chum? Hardly. My point was you like to go back several months and comment on posts, but you post the same as I has just done within a few days. I really don't understand you.

[Guest fountainhall]

Oh geez... we're still doing this?

This thread has hundreds of members. If members wish to continue discussing a subject, that is their privilege - unless a moderator feels the rules have been breached, in which case the thread will be closed.

 

Don't forget. A post is a matter of public record and open to comment by other posters. It is perfectly legitimate for posters to continue to comment on posts. So, in my view, it would be beneficial to those who object to this to be a little more careful about what they wish to say before they cast their thoughts in stone, as it were.

[Guest beachlover]

This thread has hundreds of members. If members wish to continue discussing a subject, that is their privilege - unless a moderator feels the rules have been breached, in which case the thread will be closed.

 

Don't forget. A post is a matter of public record and open to comment by other posters. It is perfectly legitimate for posters to continue to comment on posts. So, in my view, it would be beneficial to those who object to this to be a little more careful about what they wish to say before they cast their thoughts in stone, as it were.

 

There haven't been hundreds of posts, let alone members on this thread.

 

I never said posters shouldn't be allowed to continue discussing a subject or commenting.

 

So, in my view, it would be beneficial to those who object to this to be a little more careful about what they wish to say before they cast their thoughts in stone, as it were.

 

You might want to remind your buddy to do the same.

 

Bum chum? Hardly. My point was you like to go back several months and comment on posts, but you post the same as I has just done within a few days. I really don't understand you.

 

I don't understand the need for this bickering either. It's ridiculous. Most people just want the board to move forward and be a positive environment.

 

You guys feel you need to continue sniping and even bring across a PM from another board and falsely label it as slander.

[Guest fountainhall]

There haven't been hundreds of posts, let alone members on this thread.

Please accept my apologies. I should have taken my own advice and been more careful before typing. I meant "This Board has hundreds of members".

[Guest beachlover]

Fair enough - accepted graciously.

 

Now if you guys want to keep sniping... it's fine by me. But just don't expect me not to respond.