The shadow docket, historically, was rarely used. However since 2017, the current extremist majority of the Supreme Court has been using the shadow docket as a means of issuing emergency stays of lower-court rulings at the behest of the Incompetent-in-Chief's Justice Department. The shadow docket has been rightly criticized for it's lack of transparency or accountability. These are unsigned rulings where no oral arguments have been heard and little is any legal basis for the decision is provided. Ruling without arguments or precedents.
My question is given the lack of transparency, the lack of accountability, the lack of any provision of a legal reasoning and the clear political bias of the current right-wing extremism of the Court's majority, what's to prevent this Court's majority to rule in a completely opposite way with the same set of circumstances when a non-rightwing-extremist Administration is back in the White House. For example, with shadow docket overruling Humphrey’s Executor, the Supreme Court allowed for the firing of federal agencies' leadership without a rationale, even though this countered 100 years of legal precedent regarding the separation of powers. Given a sane Administration in the White House after 2028, would this extremist Supreme Court majority maintain these shadow docket rulings or would decide to flip their unexplained unsigned decisions and run interference for the extreme right?