Jump to content
Gay Guides Forum

Goober

Members
  • Posts

    343
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Goober's Achievements

  1. Good point. Fake christians are running rampant infiltrating every walk of life.
  2. Your posts supporting Hegseth haven't aged very well, except to display a level of ignorance never seen before.
  3. 'Fired on the spot': How Trump officials caught leaking war plans reacted to Clinton emails https://l.smartnews.com/p-jOtR6xW/QLTq0B Demented donOLD claims to know nothing about this breach, so even Hegseth knew our blabbermouth in chief can't be trusted with top secret information.
  4. Minnesota state senator is accused of soliciting a minor for prostitution https://ssnews.page.link/rTkLEGJNC58BVktP7 Just another typical MAGAt pervert: "Eichorn is married with four children, according to his biography on the Minnesota Senate website. He gained notoriety recently for sponsoring a proposed bill that would recognize “Trump Derangement Syndrome” as a form of mental illness. It defines “Trump Derangement Syndrome” as “the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal persons that is in reaction to the policies and presidencies of President Donald J. Trump.”"
  5. Other than his slogan blips designed for MAGAts to easily memorize, regurgitate and accept as meaningful policy such as "drill, baby, drill" and "tariffs is a beautiful word", has donOLD ever actually explained his economic policy?
  6. As George W Bush might say "donOLD, you're doing a heck of a job." Is donOLD proving to be dumber than GWB?
  7. Given your sincere desire of this "threat" [sic] to have a conversation about DOGE, it's safe to assume that you're very familiar with the official DOGE website, DOGE.gov, and not just dubious secondary sources such as TikTok. Where is the justification for the DOGE actions? The website states justifications will be posted in the future, however, wouldn't they already have that documentation available since it would likely have been needed to make a decision for their action? You don't think they're using the "READY FIRE AIM" approach, do you? And why do you suppose there are links on the website for additional details that takes the user to Musk's 'X' platform, which then requires one to register on that platform? Should a government website be promoting a privately held company?
  8. Will either or both of the stranded astronauts be laid off due to DOGE? They were required to return to their office weeks ago, but as of yet, have chosen to disregard the order. Hopefully, they'll at least get to participate in a photo op with donOLD before he sacks them.
  9. Some of the US military operations have been questionable and some possibly even illegal. I don't defend that. But don't let that stop you. Go right ahead and defend the indefensible.
  10. Here's a question and response from Chatgpt (several other sources give a similar response). So, if you want to continue arguing with Chatgpt, knock your socks off: Was russia's invasion of Ukraine legal? Chatgpt response: Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which began in February 2022, is widely regarded as a violation of international law, particularly the principles of the United Nations (UN) Charter. The UN Charter prohibits the use of force by one country against another, except in cases of self-defense or with the approval of the UN Security Council. In this case, Russia's invasion of Ukraine has been widely condemned by the international community, and many nations, including those in the European Union, the United States, and others, argue that it was an illegal act of aggression. The UN General Assembly passed a resolution demanding that Russia withdraw its forces from Ukraine, and the International Criminal Court (ICC) has opened investigations into potential war crimes committed during the invasion. From a legal standpoint, there is no clear justification under international law for Russia's actions, as Ukraine had not attacked Russia, and Russia's claims of protecting Russian-speaking populations and fighting against alleged threats were not recognized as valid grounds for military intervention under international law.
  11. WRONG
  12. Do you have a point you're trying to make?
  13. Go ahead and dig all the rabbit holes you want. Maybe you’ll even earn a "like" from the forum's resident airhead. Nothing you posted gave a legitimate reason for russia's invasion of Ukraine. Nothing.
  14. Bullsh!t That might be a reason they won't leave. It's not a reason why they can't leave.
×
×
  • Create New...