Riobard

Oh, you’ll break.😘

You hit the mark if you are referring to the agita of boxing gender and the steaming piles of bull shovelled around it by ignoramuses. These Games were the anti-Barbie of the year.

I think he’s an amazing athlete. Does he need a heads up that you plan to ‘stalk him home’?

I’ll have a go. It’s weird to comment, regarding Olympic athletes, that you are not a fan of the physical development that evolves from training. But then choosing Olympic competitors as a pool from which to articulate your preferred body types is weirder.

It seems the thread is making the endless preliminary rounds of genital controversy.

Attendendum, Domine, cum gratiarum actione.

Merci. Much appreciated @hornyfrog. It doesn’t assist me because I’ve worked it out like the average person can. It may help some less familiar because it convincingly debunks the annoying ill-conceived myth that the fee paid inevitably correlates with degree of malfeasance, as if sexual fun must exist in a war zone or on a needlessly anxious stock exchange floor, horns bearing down and claws swiping up. The theme will inevitably persist well past everybody’s Depends phase.

Especially a garnishment involving Colonel Mustard in conservatory while waving poker ominously.

I think the meta message is don’t just keep the unwrapped Magnum beside you and pass it by. After you’ve dropped your load and descend, you could be kicking yourself. And like for ambrosia, don’t let it sit out too long.

It’s Grimm, Princess, when you have to resort to tapping out the tightly shut shallow box of fairy tales.

Jeez Louise. Finally. What does it take to get a fake litigator out of your feed? A village running in circles tripping over itself. And he’ll still be checking in with a pitcher of Kool-aid and a plate of apple wedges offering plenty of sleep.

Doesn’t like nice builds. Interest not divers. I’d say, Cyndi, they don’t all just wanna have fun.

This Canadian has had the recommended Imvamune inoculation prior to Vitamin D supplementation shots. The predictable anti-vaxxer shade:

I was correcting a binary concept as upthread the conclusion appeared to be possible spousal exclusion according to Thai inheritance law. For sure, as you advise, check the small print as a national or resident farang prior to scratching out your last wishes on the Foodland napkin if you wish to spare your beneficiaries subsequently running through Agatha Christie plot lines.

Are you staggering when using tumblers? I assume that when you shake or stir the cocktail those metrics land at 100% and Schweppes has long ago fizzed out of business.

But do offer the anorexic type the signature Parisian chocolate muffin because you never know whether he’ll take a break from restricted intake.

Little known feature, possibly? Just a thought. Those of reputation stature may be excluded? Full disclosure: One can simply and easily skim over content by those with a history of limited substance according to assessment. As such you can bypass content you’d rather not have to flyswat away whether it shows non logged in, or alternatively out of sight in the proper receptacle you patched in. Sometimes, though, the invisible could have generated some of your best material. With apologies to Lagoa. It takes little to benefit from the venue. Just be open and respectful. And grateful.

Line up those Sardinians into a tin and make me an offer to roll back the top cover.

Interesting development. I found the rides exhilarating.

This is a universally understood heuristic by now. A lot of sites of any source contain fakery.

Canadian Men’s 4 x 100m sprint relay team. Not referring to a prospective 5-some fantasy, as they don’t compete for our sexual edification. However, it was for me the best moment, first in class first in show, in fact officially less than a minute of absolute awe.

If one were to simply subscribe to Bangkok Post this article could be scrolled past or selected according to interest or taste. That’s how most peopIe typically approach newscasts.

You don’t need to be trained in law to determine in a few seconds that a surviving spouse, according to the legislation, whether cohabiting or separated, has the statutory right of inheritance. Divorced status would necessitate a different adjudication process. The summary presented above appears to be a standard hierarchy of succession based on blood relation. I haven’t drilled down but I assume that surviving spouse trumps any allocation in the context of otherwise missing specificity.