Riobard

You are quite the wanderer. Where’s your minder? Tripartite Orientation assessment: time after time annoyingly boring; spaced out; fails to know his place. Ask her. Help may be out there.

I think that if one reads the thread thoroughly and neutrally the meta analytical research conclusions prevail. In some circles the expanded notion of metasynthesis might emerge, that a cost/benefit conclusion be nevertheless contextualized within bioethics. Metananalysis does not dismiss concepts of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy/ selfdetermination, societal wellbeing, fairness, etc, but there may be a faction that purports that autonomy is essentially retroactively inappropriately nullified by default with infant circumcision. That’s life. This can be binned with parental decision substitution across a broad clinical range and the best that can be attempted in actual application is policy steered by the scales of research data. Digging heels in the sand on the view that consent is vitiated will not likely be amenable to shifts when conceit surrounding perspectives is so ingrained. We cannot give babies, say, standard gamble tradeoff options but latent figurative tantrums are not particularly surprising. All that can be done is be factual, not get too caught up in cherry-picked refute dosed with rebuke, and electively express some degree of empathy regarding a contrarian position whether entrenched in belief systems or actual delusion. Fortunately it’s not equivalent in scope to, say, HIV denialism at point of care.

Patrick Chan also had a piano music short program with a high score at the time that I watched over and over; may have been Chopin. Of course there is dual aspect commentary but there is only so much language option and if you follow all seasonal competitions with the same network hosts it gets no less repetitive than trick ticking.

I’ve never considered an acidic sad sack clown to represent the acid test of acceptable expression style. Maybe a peanut gallery handful stand by you but what other than rampant narcissism and lack of insight makes you think I give a shit? Ask her. Add that it’s pertinent to skating and that with such a permanent single dbl triple quad double axe to grind you uniformly fail to stick the landing … splat! orthopaedics contacts, etc?

Your anxiety reflects such multi factorial pathology. Ask her.

Well I don’t buy that external hype should influence one’s enjoyment and I just liked it without significant media exposure. Also knew the expected plot trajectory and only wondered if there were to be marked deviation from the novel. Translating interior narrative to moving pic script is a challenge. There are no gaps and silences in written fiction. Part 2 is much psychologically deeper IMHO and reflects typical couple developmental theory and practice. I think it will be harder to capture. It’s unclear how much other characters headlined within her collective works will feature. But the viewers are primed and I wonder if there will be audience testing to determine and finesse enjoyment. The two main book characters have consistently been able to overcome their genital anomalies, one a micro penis, the other hypospadias and associated surgical scarring constricting tumescence.

Did somebody ask or pressure you to view the series? You seem quite passionate about thumbing down on an offering that wasn’t intended or made for Pornhub. Is there a paywall? What might incentivize you to watch any program that doesn’t contain material matching your arousal template? I ask because I deem you as being uniquely bright and interesting. The backdrop of sports is quite minimalistic compared to the novels. But I get the somatotype disparity and might consider gymnastics or diving a better match. I’m in Colombia and won’t see the GG taping for weeks unless I make an effort through some other platform. I may have been primed to tear up because I got misty long ago reading the books, where upon a blank canvass could be imagined the players.

Ah, from the incessant troll that broke the sound barrier of boredom years ago to the degree that nothing meaningful can be discerned from her blather, but there’s no escaping awareness of her constant run on verbal wilderness diarrhea.

She got to use her other hand counting up and still bellyaching.

But surely you realize you are lecturing to a substantial proportion of contributors to the thread who lack reading comprehension and whine about how put upon they are when content mismatches their level of intelligence.

You were perhaps expecting a fever dream. You need to watch Tierney’s Shoresy, several seasons set in mining town Sudbury, where my mother ended up in LTC in her 90’s, to realize the budget constraints behind this new sleeper hit’s prep and inexplicable success. It obviously didn’t need the specifications you personally outline. I think Reid’s novels are better, though.

You packed a lot in, impressively, over 9 days considering feeling unwell for part of it. If you missed it, literally steps from your lodgings, long staircase by Golden Park or winding travessa option, try to get up to the lovely church (c1734?) for the architecture, tiles, and view. Sunday morning a good bet to see inside prior to the nearby vast market.

OK, I give. What random word salad isn’t the core of your content? You are clearly at your best trolling, albeit unsophisticated. Just do that.

Is this an excerpt from a short story that actually makes sense?

WTAF?!

Hunh?

You’re beyond any.

That’s exactly the type of response that coheres with my appraisal. Again, ask her, but fill in the blanks.

Right, because a skinflint always possesses the most precise assessment of a cheated person’s affect.

Non-manipulation SVP.

Unlike here, the protocol for handling narcissism that comes a clinician’s way in a treatment context is quite different. I am also, paradoxically, getting paid to be respected and the fee is much higher to be a sad sack’s punching bag. Toxic costs more. They are paying to do some work in good faith. Somebody like you? … I’d perhaps find an excuse to not accommodate, even if it meant a white lie regarding my own adequacy. One or two per year maximum quota. The lawyers, for example, in my practice have been typically respectful and rewarding. You wouldn’t find them trolling in a desperate ploy for relevance. Anonymity alters the picture both in terms of personal comportment and style of language. Lawyers in opposition and adversarial, in contrast, for example in a sitch of expert testimony, have been put in their places. The dynamic and exchange obviously contextually differs. I have been consistently disabused of the notion that they are particularly intelligent analytically or correctly anticipatory regarding opponents’ ability in relation to the subject adjudicated. But many are reasonably bright and often have unfamiliar curves tossed at them. Their level of deference is moot and likely cloaked in resentment. I’m not completely sure of your background but I’d say you are pretty easy-peasy to compartmentalize in such a way as to amputate from day to day consciousness. You’re the guy with a low single-digit array of lazy retorts. I would never explicitly formulate “Asshole not specified” although it colloquially fits in some instances, and your relation would grasp the wordplay, perhaps even chuckle. Ask your in-law for translational guidance without necessarily revealing the players. That said, a family member essentially has hands tied not knowing all of the behavioural aspects of an aging geezer punter oriented to, say, seeking unprotected insertive anal intercourse with naïve and physically poorly developed and socioeconomically deprived young men abroad for pay. That might partially trump any misguided personal regard heretofore displayed. Only you know for sure what about your number fits the scenario. There can only be bad or neutral sexual tourism. Good sexual tourism is a misnomer and most patients, lawyers, clinicians, etc, would agree.

Perhaps I’ll never learn. Take the first text pass as a clue to the mind numbing to come. Take the lame critic’s fallback urging uptake of psychotropic meds as predictive of drivel. But on that very subject, appreciate his stimulation of marketing creativity: “Keethqueef, the hot wind beneath your wings”. Ask your in-law why you refuse to ignore content you find disagreeable while proclaiming to block me. Obsessed much? She has her work cut out, all DSM axes, inn’t? The most basic can seem the most complex.

Just helping you release your inner troll tension. More altruistic than fun. No, strike that a little; each time dealing with your ilk adds extra self-efficacy. As far as incomprehensible nonsense just read your own topic. The majority is “in” commentary. Is it a drunken dinner party transcript? Just clarify from the outset so as to offer a take-a-pass option, or a glossary for those with time to waste. Sheesh.

I can skate a rink circuit but the best musical accompaniment to a program, if I ever attempted one, would be ‘London Bridge is Falling Down’ for the short and ‘Husha Husha They All Fall Down’ for the long.

Decoding anybody? I have been to Bangkok. Most of this would have dissuaded me from visiting but I quite enjoyed the several interesting weeks there.