Riobard

Did somebody ask or pressure you to view the series? You seem quite passionate about thumbing down on an offering that wasn’t intended or made for Pornhub. Is there a paywall? What might incentivize you to watch any program that doesn’t contain material matching your arousal template? I ask because I deem you as being uniquely bright and interesting. The backdrop of sports is quite minimalistic compared to the novels. But I get the somatotype disparity and might consider gymnastics or diving a better match. I’m in Colombia and won’t see the GG taping for weeks unless I make an effort through some other platform. I may have been primed to tear up because I got misty long ago reading the books, where upon a blank canvass could be imagined the players.

Ah, from the incessant troll that broke the sound barrier of boredom years ago to the degree that nothing meaningful can be discerned from her blather, but there’s no escaping awareness of her constant run on verbal wilderness diarrhea.

She got to use her other hand counting up and still bellyaching.

But surely you realize you are lecturing to a substantial proportion of contributors to the thread who lack reading comprehension and whine about how put upon they are when content mismatches their level of intelligence.

You were perhaps expecting a fever dream. You need to watch Tierney’s Shoresy, several seasons set in mining town Sudbury, where my mother ended up in LTC in her 90’s, to realize the budget constraints behind this new sleeper hit’s prep and inexplicable success. It obviously didn’t need the specifications you personally outline. I think Reid’s novels are better, though.

You packed a lot in, impressively, over 9 days considering feeling unwell for part of it. If you missed it, literally steps from your lodgings, long staircase by Golden Park or winding travessa option, try to get up to the lovely church (c1734?) for the architecture, tiles, and view. Sunday morning a good bet to see inside prior to the nearby vast market.

OK, I give. What random word salad isn’t the core of your content? You are clearly at your best trolling, albeit unsophisticated. Just do that.

Is this an excerpt from a short story that actually makes sense?

WTAF?!

Hunh?

You’re beyond any.

That’s exactly the type of response that coheres with my appraisal. Again, ask her, but fill in the blanks.

Right, because a skinflint always possesses the most precise assessment of a cheated person’s affect.

Non-manipulation SVP.

Unlike here, the protocol for handling narcissism that comes a clinician’s way in a treatment context is quite different. I am also, paradoxically, getting paid to be respected and the fee is much higher to be a sad sack’s punching bag. Toxic costs more. They are paying to do some work in good faith. Somebody like you? … I’d perhaps find an excuse to not accommodate, even if it meant a white lie regarding my own adequacy. One or two per year maximum quota. The lawyers, for example, in my practice have been typically respectful and rewarding. You wouldn’t find them trolling in a desperate ploy for relevance. Anonymity alters the picture both in terms of personal comportment and style of language. Lawyers in opposition and adversarial, in contrast, for example in a sitch of expert testimony, have been put in their places. The dynamic and exchange obviously contextually differs. I have been consistently disabused of the notion that they are particularly intelligent analytically or correctly anticipatory regarding opponents’ ability in relation to the subject adjudicated. But many are reasonably bright and often have unfamiliar curves tossed at them. Their level of deference is moot and likely cloaked in resentment. I’m not completely sure of your background but I’d say you are pretty easy-peasy to compartmentalize in such a way as to amputate from day to day consciousness. You’re the guy with a low single-digit array of lazy retorts. I would never explicitly formulate “Asshole not specified” although it colloquially fits in some instances, and your relation would grasp the wordplay, perhaps even chuckle. Ask your in-law for translational guidance without necessarily revealing the players. That said, a family member essentially has hands tied not knowing all of the behavioural aspects of an aging geezer punter oriented to, say, seeking unprotected insertive anal intercourse with naïve and physically poorly developed and socioeconomically deprived young men abroad for pay. That might partially trump any misguided personal regard heretofore displayed. Only you know for sure what about your number fits the scenario. There can only be bad or neutral sexual tourism. Good sexual tourism is a misnomer and most patients, lawyers, clinicians, etc, would agree.