Suckrates

I dont have to think. I READ what you write....its pretty clear. And you have proven that you are one of those people that thinks he is being attacked and criticized because someone disagrees with him... How self-indulgent and shallow. You dont have to be a rocket scientist to know that if you only want to hear ONE side, your are limiting participation. Come on Lucky, i know you have SOME education ? And PLEASE Lucky, be cognizant of the fact that when I post, YOU always criticize and stir that pot. It's just what you do, although you try to present yourself as the Mother Teresa here. I dont believe you ever have a good intention. .

Meghan & Harry speed off in their $4M getaway car !

Just wanted to pass this concern, along. I just heard elsewhere that someone tried to create a New user Profile here, but was offended by the REQUIREMENT to specify Ethnicity... Oz, "food for thought" ???

Trump unleashes new political earthquake with FBI spy charge....

For anyone that watched Janet Jackson receive some Icon award at the Billboard Music Awards, her live performance was quite disappointing.... At 50 +, Janet sure looked gorgeous, but her performance (partially lip synched) lacked the usual power and energy you expect from a Janet performance. Kudos to the promoters who designed a production number designed to create enough chaos around her, with minions of dancers and crazy lighting to detract from her lethargy. AND she wore FLATS ! But gurl gets props for swinging that 3 ft ponytail !!!! While Janet may have the hops to still create great music, it looked like it was time for her to hang up up "live performing" heels ? Recent clips of Madonna and Cher performances, who are also clearly in their Golden Years, illustrated a lack of the usual energy produced in their sets.... While still FABULOUS !! I am not blaming them...At their age, bodies break down and everyday there is some ache or pain, even if they are in tip-top shape. Fans expect 100% especially if they pay big bucks for a ticket. Do you think there is a time that these performers should stop performing LIVE ???

Shalom Aleichem ! (we can post in other languages HERE, right ?)

OK, but this was The Royal Wedding, NOT the Rev Curry Show....... Noone was there to see HIM...... Plus the fact that he kept repeating himself... With a little editing, he could have been done in 5 minutes, which would have been MORE than enough.

All Beefy and showing Biceps at Billboard Music Awards tonight.....

That's why Meghan had that Big tote bag..... for all those Crown jewels she's gonna walk away with !

I can't believe I DID it.....and she's BLACK !

Its neither. It a disagreement. I simply dont disagree with Luckys theory, which is clearly a contradiction. One one hand he started the thread to encourage participation, but ONLY wants people who agree with a subject to post. Doesnt that LIMIT participation ? I guess he was so focused, he didnt think there could be another side to his proposal , which has the opposite effect to what he intended. ?

Lucky, you clearly dont understand the point, and are trying to agitate the members.. Noone is speaking of attacks. I am speaking of a negative comment, which EVERY member has a right to make. What kind of bullshit site would this be if everyone just agreed with everyone. We are not Steppford wives... There is a clear distinction between a disagreement and an attack, and if a member cant take a negative comment and interprets it as an attack against him....he doesnt belong on ANY public site. You are clearly making this into something its not. And a disagreement or negative comment should never result in a fight, unless people like YOU encourage it ! My suggestion to YOU Lucky: if you want a site where you can comment and have no negative pushback, start your own blog and dont allow any outside commentary... That way you can spout all the bullshit you want and be hollier than thou.

I feel people should be welcomed to comment anyway they see fit, and not think they have to sanitize their comments to appease the crowd. Of course civility is always encouraged, but a negative comment should not be interpretted as an attack. It's merely a difference of opinion, and this is the part where things go awry. A poster will feel attacked, and attack back, and hence the feud ensues. As long as a comment is CIVIL, it should be received as such, even if its message is negative. If that's how the poster feels, that's how he feels. If his posts are troublesome to you, use your handy IGNORE button, and you wont have to deal with it. Everyones opinion is important, not just the ones that AGREE with you !

Gee, and all along I though it was my mom, who allowed me to wear her high heels when I was just a wee lass..... Good to know, cause I always blamed her....

The Happy Royals arrive for their After-Party.....Stunning.....

KNOW your Cocks......

You can always sit in a wheelchair, but your legs will look Fabulous.

He was talkin bout LOVE, I got that after the first minute. He could have stopped there....But twenty minutes later still yappin.... Did you see the guests faces ? They were NOT pleased. They shudda had a Rabbi talk.... He would ask if there was a Prenup and been done with it !

Lovely, OK then , discussion is over.

If you didnt care, you wouldn't have started a thread about it here. In some way, YOU DO CARE.... There is nothing wrong with admitting it. And making assupmtions for Daddy's actions doesnt justify it. He was just being his usual self.... A DICK ! Sorry, it's just how I see it.

I think it's pretty dictatorial to LOCK a thread that discusses REASONING for a site rule, as was done over THERE. In civil company, this could prove to be an enlightening discussion, BUT shutting it down completely just says "FUCK YOU, it's MY way, keep your mouth shut and Deal with it or get the hell out! "