unicorn

Well, I had a 2 PM appointment, clearly after lunch, when I'd not be expected to have flossed immediately before coming in, and could be expected to have some food between my teeth. I would be concerned that she has a mindset like a Trumpster: someone who, once his mind is set, simply believes what he wants to believe, and doesn't keep his mind open to other possibilities, disregarding any evidence which doesn't fit in with his pre-conceived idea. Although this is probably more dangerous for a physician than for a dentist, I still don't like the attitude.

I should add that the further data the FDA requested, but didn't receive, were from the Phase III trials. Phase I trials simply establish basic safety (i.e the treatment isn't simply highly dangerous). Phase II trials confirm the efficacy of the treatment. Phase III trials are there both to confirm efficacy, but, more importantly, to establish overall safety (rarer side-effects). As it turned out, it was discovered that the first Dengue vaccine only helped those who'd previously had Dengue, but often made matters worse for someone who's never had dengue previously. This could be the problem for Qdenga. The inability (or unwillingness?) of Takeda to provide the Phase III data is a bit troubling. In the meantime, I'd prefer to simply liberally apply DEET, although of course it doesn't smell great.

At my last dental visit, my dentist straight out told me (falsely) that I wasn't flossing my teeth (which I do). I then informed her that I do, indeed, floss my teeth every day, to which she had the gall to say "No, you don't!". I wouldn't have minded if she had started by saying "Are you sure you're flossing your teeth every day?", but to make that statement, and then tell me I was lying to her, I couldn't accept. I definitely have my faults, but being a liar isn't one of them. My next dental check-up will be with someone else. This was rather nervy behavior in my view. Have any of you had similar experiences?

There are no real scientific studies (randomized clinical trials) which show efficacy of IV vitamins to improve fatigue and/or hangovers. The fact that someone "swore they felt better" after such a treatment isn't evidence of anything. Qdenga is probably safe and effective, but there have been some concerns, which should hopefully be resolved fairly soon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dengue_vaccine#cite_note-14 "...Qdenga received approval for use in the European Union in 2022 for people aged 4 and above,[45][46][47] and is also approved in the United Kingdom, Brazil, Argentina, Indonesia, and Thailand. Takeda voluntarily withdrew their application for the vaccination's approval in the United States in July 2023 after the FDA sought further data from the firm, which the company stated could not be provided during the current review cycle...".

@Moses lying, on this site?? Why I'm absolutely shocked! 🤣

Someone recently told me that it's popular at children's parties for children to dress as Selena, striking pinatas of her murderer, Yolanda Salidvar:

😉

From my understanding from religious historians, the appeal of Christianity is how easy it is to get to heaven, per New Testament lore. In ancient Rome and Egypt, only the rich and powerful could be assured a pleasant afterlife. Christianity made heaven open to the masses (in fact, being poor is preferred). That made Christianity a big hit. Then the empires fell... 🙄

I'm surprised Bangkok suffered so much damage so far from the epicenter. Are the building inspectors corrupt, and open to bribes to certify buildings which don't meet building standards?

If I had to pick a religion, Zoroastrianism makes the most sense. It suffers from poor marketing, hence its lack of popularity. I read a book from a religious historical researcher, and he believed the Jesus story was concocted by the apostles. The Romans apparently kept good records of who was being crucified, and there are no records of "Jesus" until many years after his death. The most stupid religion, IMHO, is LDS, but boy do they have aggressive marketing, fundraising, and extortion to promote that religion. Eeek. In ancient history, civilizations which took on Christianity collapsed soon after conversion (Roman, Egyptian, British India)--so maybe polytheism is the way. Whenever we see on the news of tornadoes sweeping through the Bible Belt, I tell my husband "There goes Lord Shiva vacuuming the Bible Belt again!".

Sometimes corporals break the rules, then they must be punished... 😁

Well, you have come to the crux of whether there is any reason to believe in a God at all. In particular, the stories of the Bible seem particularly preposterous. I'm at a loss to understand why anybody believes that stuff, but one would think that at least priests, deacons, and nuns believed what they're preaching. Despite my not believing in God or an afterlife, I would never murder or rape, because I find those acts personally repugnant. However, even if I didn't have an ethical issue with rape and murder, I can't imagine doing that if I had even a feeling that there may be a 1% chance that the Bible is a truthful document, and that I therefore might risk eternal torment by violating the ten commandments. I can't imagine these "religious" figures thought there was any chance whatsoever that the teaching of the Bible were truthful.

Thank you for those references (Ireland and Australia). Any references to such activities in the US?

Is there a Wikipedia page or website where I can learn more about this?