
stevenkesslar
Members-
Posts
2,281 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by stevenkesslar
-
No. No. No. We will not put @Barknaway down. That is just not an option. I love my cute adorable yapping stupid as fuck dog. Please, everyone. Offer your condolences and be extra kind to @Barknaway today. I mean, it was bad enough when supposedly leftist 538 showed Trump polled net negative a few weeks ago. No question why right wingers celebrate that Nate Silver's old website outlived its usefulness when he left. But now right-of-center if not full on MAGA Real Clear Politics shows the same thing. Horrors! No! I love our stupid yapping fucking dog. We can't put him down. He is so adorable, with his videos no one watches and what not! Please be kind to him! Pet him! Give him a treat. We will just have to develop a strategy to make sure Trump does not get more unpopular on our own. Because, just between us, our yapping dog is quite stupid and facile. And a little homophobic. Let's address the problems. The latest YouGov poll seems to spotlight the issues. 1. Since January 2025, has the inflation rate: 48 % gone up 27 % stayed the same 6 % gone down So Trump promised to lower prices, but they are going up. Let's see. How about we lower taxes for billionaires and cut Medicaid and Medicare? Maybe throw in a free Tesla for MAGA billionaires? That should solve the problem, right? Our yapping dog would no doubt agree. 2. Would you support or oppose the following: imposing a 25 % tariff on goods imported from Canada. 31 % support 54 % oppose This prove two things. First, Trump had an overwhelming mandate for tariffs when fewer than 50 % of Americans voted for him. They just forgot. Dumb Americans! Second, most people are stupid when they believe tariffs will increase inflation. Trump knows better! So clearly we need more tariffs, right? Our stupid yapping dog will no doubt agree. I could go on forever. It seems like Trump has a mandate to do all kinds of things people don't want or like. So if we just do those things, he will soon be more popular. Right?
-
Do me a favor and call me schizo. Okay? And I still want my fucking AI picture! But you will like this. Because it is mafia language. And Putin and Trump are both like murderous, greedy mafia thugs. So I have been called a "hit man" which I take as a compliment. This is true. Is that worse than having anger management issues? And the woman who called me a "hit man" was called a "hit man" by her husband on a very fun walk we had. True. And that woman is one of the best LGBTQ organizers in the world, even though she is Straight and married. True. In fact, were I Straight, I might have married her. True. And she is close to the US Gay mafia, which does exist. True. Is that enough mafia for you? Sadly, this is not like the Russian mafia. The US Gay mafia does not kill people, empower oligarchs, or do what thugs like Putin tell them to do. They elect good Gay governors (e.g. Jared Polis in Colorado) and win things like same sex marriage. Sucks, huh? If we could only all live in Homophobe Genocide World! My Straight friend is particularly good at hugs, love, and warmth. Truth be told, that is not my strong suit, especially as an organizer. I am good at Rules For Radicals, Alinsky, and using confrontation to win big things. But my Straight friend is tough as nails when she needs to be. Which is why her husband, who would know, called her a hit man. But, to your point, I can be a schizo. As an organizer, I was often a hit man. To my MAGA-like Trump loving niece, who I love to travel with, I just try to be kind and loving. Even though I do believe some of what she thinks is false, shallow, and kind of repugnant. Anyhoo, thanks for the compliments. I am sorry you live in homophobic Genocide World. And I want my picture!
-
Mounting U.S. debt problems could lead to ‘shocking developments’
stevenkesslar replied to reader's topic in Politics
Oh, and by the way, this would cause a tiny little inflation problem too. I sort of view this as above my pay grade. But some of the people talking about the implications of a debt crisis talk about things like 25 % inflation. It sound scary and unimaginable. But Dalio's point is at some point the printing press can't just keep printing more money. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimated last year when he was running that Trump's projected budget deficit would be something like 9 % of GDP, maybe even 10 % if I recall right. It was a projection last year, and it is all being haggled over right now. But I think we know for sure we will go in exactly the opposite, and wrong, direction, of where Dalio correctly says we need to go. Trump will give a fortune to billionaires, which will help make Trump the king of bankrupting the US. -
I know this. I'm fine with Andy Beshear or Rahm Emanuel being POTUS and moving the Democratic Party back to the center, and a majority. 2028 is a long way away. But it is already clear from what guys like Beshear and Emanuel that Democrats in power got the memo. But I want a pound of flesh. And I want it to be Elon Musk's cruel, child abusing, senior-hating, megalomaniac ass. This cruel abusive lying fuck needs to have every single fucking penny he gets from the government stripped away from him. I don't want oligarchs in America. This man does not deserve one fucking penny of my taxpayer money. When Democrats are back n control, this man needs to be stripped of every penny the fraudster, and abuser of his own queer daughter, gets from the federal government.
-
This is Reagan 2.0, without the political power of Reagan. The whole game back then was they were only cutting "waste, fraud, and abuse" from programs. So Democrats kept asking where is the waste, fraud, and abuse? The Reaganomics who wanted to cut taxes for the rich always said it existed, but they never found it. Here's the thing. Reagan did win in a landslide. Twice. Trump did win twice. But the first time was only because the US was a slave nation, so we have this fucked up thing called the electoral college. That is why Trump won in 2016. He lost the popular vote by millions in 2016. Okay, so he won the popular vote in 2024. But not by much. Not even a majority. So he has no real mandate, other than to lower prices. And he ain't doing that. Which is why his approval rating is dropping like a knife already. Maybe our yapping dog is trying to hide that fact by barking incessantly, and uselessly.
-
Sheesh! I ask for something really simple and I get this. I want my fake AI picture of me laughing at your weak, genocide-loving ass. I asked you two times: have you ever once supported LGBTQ rights in Russia? The answer is no. You are a weak, timid man who supports genocide. I'm not telling you to go get jailed or murdered by Genocide Man. But what right does living in homophobic Genocide World where Genocide Man kills or jails Gays like me give you to call me a homophobe for calling Putin the murderous homophobic piece of shit that he is? You are a weak, pathetic man. I want my Ai picture of me laughing at your weak pathetic ass. Can you just do that one thing?
-
I wrote a whole paragraph on Genocide Man and his piece of shit sidekick Trump. Of course you don't agree with it. So all you got is "homophobe". Seriously. I want my AI image of me laughing at your weak, pathetic ass. In addition to being a Putin loving man, a Genocide backer, and a fool, you apparently have a reading comprehension problem. And, of course, no comprehension whatsoever of LGBTQ rights, LGBTQ organizing, or LGBTQ anything. And now suddenly you're the judge and jury on homophobia? Coming from RUSSIA - Genocide World - and defending Putin? You're a complete fool. Putin would jail or kill me and my friends if we tried to do what we have done in Russia. And YOU, weak fool, are lecturing me about homophobia? That's not anger issues. That's comedy. I am laughing at what a fool you are. Thanks for the laugh. Go make some AI images of me laughing at what a weak, genocide defending fool you are. You did not answer my question. Have you ever ever once publicly fought for LGBT rights in Russia? I would love to hear how. I don't think you have. I think you are a weak, fearful man who will get on the internet, defend genocide, and fight for nothing. But your AI tool is mostly right. I do have a background in political activism and LGBTQ rights organizing. Thank you for acknowledging I actually fought for things like same sex marriage. And you are just a weak fool who supports Putin and his genocide. I have no idea why that qualifies you to call me a homophobe. But go ahead. It makes me laugh. You've also done a great job over a series of posts teaching me how emotionally ignorant AI currently is. Every time you post what AI thinks it knows, it reveals some basic ignorance. I do view winning same sex marriage as the political organizing win of my lifetime. Even though I was a nobody volunteer, in an ocean of well-meaning volunteers. So AI, and you, missed my whole point of me being one little ant in an army of millions of powerless ants all over the globe - but not including YOU, weak man, or Russia. What you don't get about the LGBTQ experience, and how we won a long fight for same sex marriage and equality, is that millions of Gay men and lesbians and allies all over the world opened their hearts, told their stories, and changed all of human history. Except in Russia, of course. This is something a weak fool like you can not understand. You have never experienced this kind of love, or unity, or power, or transformation. And you never will. And you ask whether I have principles? What a weak, pathetic fool you are. So if all you got is defending genocide and calling me a homophobe, go ahead. I want my AI image of me laughing at the weak fool you are. This is hilarious!
-
You're funny. You come here to defend genocide. You do. You rationalize away the intentional mass murder of Ukrainian women and children. And now you are reproaching me as a homophobe? That's funny! You're a fool. And a fool who supports genocide. First, a few paragraphs of righteous indignation. How many years did you spend as a volunteer training teams to win same sex marriage in Russia? Let me guess. ZERO! You are a fearful man who supports your sick leader's genocidal plans. If you have ever once publicly fought for LGBT rights in Russia, I would love to hear how. Mostly you strike me as a fearful and compliant genocide supporter. Your homophobic genocidal leader is a disaster for the global LGBTQ movement Meanwhile, I'm friends with some of the best LGBTQ organizers on the planet. Who might be dead or in jail if they lived in Russia, thanks to Murderous Vlad. I have been paid to win many organizing campaigns, none of which involved LGBTQ rights. But the funnest period of my life was several years in California on the eve of our historic SCOTUS victory, when I was a volunteer training teams of people going door to door to persuade Californians to support same sex marriage. I was working with friends paid to do this, while I was also traveling the world as a high priced hooker. Have you ever done any of this, Genocide Friend? I doubt it. Many Gay men think of same sex marriage as a legal victory. Technically, it was. Our lawyers were heroes. But even SCOTUS members said they were reading public opinion polls before they ruled. So the key thing the LGBTQ community did is change the hearts of minds of a nation, and really the world. I view it as the biggest organizing victory of my life. I view myself as one of millions of loving and heartfelt little ants, who built an army that changed the world. We were this vibrant loving strong LGBTQ community unified, and we literally reversed an entire global history of discrimination. After my friend Thalia helped win this in the US, she was literally paid to go to Ireland and train them how to win it there. And she did! And she helped find a Gay prime minister, as a bonus. Have you ever done that in Russia, you cowardly fearful genocide supporter? You are a fearful compliant little man, with small hateful ideas. In terms or your laughable attack on me, Genocide Supporter, my point in that photo is you have a worthless piece of shit who is running a genocide, and his compliant piece of shit POTUS who is betraying America, NATO, and our allies. Of course your genocidal monster loves it! I wish I could say either of them were at least pro-LGBTQ. Since it would give me something positive to say. But, no. They both torment vulnerable LGBTQ communities. You should be embarrassed about your genocidal and homophobic monster, you small fearful man.
-
The one thing I will say in Hakeem's defense is that following Nancy Pelosi was going to be difficult if not impossible for anyone. If I had to name the smartest Democratic leaders of my lifetime, it would be Bill Clinton or Barack Obama or Nancy Pelosi. I could make a great argument that she should be at the top of the list. All three made some big fuck ups, as well. But especially if I factor in how bad were the fucks ups versus all their successes, Nancy's ratio of success is probably better than the other two. She is the Democrat who mostly won things. I always had a theory as a community organizer that there is simply nothing like organizing Moms trying to protect their kids. The non-literal phrase I have used a lot is that many Moms would slit their wrist to protect their children. That could sound sexist or patronizing. But having organized many Moms I just think it is a fact. And that's not to say Dads are bad. It is just to says Moms and Moms, and great Moms are great Moms. So I always viewed that as part of Nancy's thing. With Trump she has what I viewed as an appropriate instinct to protect us from this felon and rapist and predator at all costs. It stands out now in particular, as I said in a recent post, because Nancy was 1000 % like this with Trump. She fought him fiercely, and I think did almost everything right. Which is to say she went for the jugular. Harris did that one time: in the Sept. debate, which worked great for her. Then she drifted into pablum. Had Harris had Pelosi's instinct of going for Trump's jugular relentlessly, which she did not, she might have eked out a narrow win rather than a narrow loss. Coulda woulda shoulda. But I agree with you about Hakeem. At this point he seems to stand for nothing, and fight for nothing. As a contrast to Ro, I read some anecdote about how Hakeem went to some meeting with Silicon Valley donors recently and talked about "mending fences". That to me is the problem, not the solution. Ro will say many of the richest people in the US live in my district. And I will tell them to their face I want them to pay more taxes, now, to help the working class. That is an actual solution, unlike Hakeem's seemingly empty rhetoric and fat cat fundraising. In my view it was the fat cat fundraising and lobbying from Sinema and Manchin in particular that blocked Biden from doing things - like tax the rich and keep the child tax credits - that might have given more working class Moms and Dads a reason to feel in their gut that Democrats fought for them. That said, either Ro or Hakeem are better than Trump, who is now actively planning on how to screw the working class. He is raising prices on cars, groceries, and lots of other things working class people buy. He is planning to cut Medicare and Medicaid they depend on. He is firing veterans. And working class people know it. Which is why Trump's approval rating and consumer confidence is already trending down.
-
House GOP conservatives make plea to 'hesistant' moderates on Medicaid changes The insolent pig is just really, really, really, really, really fucking stupid. This should have been obvious in 2017 when all these seniors who voted for Trump said something like this: "See, people like me are smart. Cuz after I vote for Donald Trump, why would he cut my Obamacare? Unless he gives me something better? I voted for Trump. Him hurting me just doesn't make sense. Smart guys like me can figure this out." Well, it didn't make sense. But Trump did it anyway. Go figure. Veterans and seniors are about to get their throats slit the same way, more than likely. Why would trump hurt the very people who voted for him? Maybe because Trump really is that fucking stupid. And he only gives a shit about himself, and his billionaire cronies.
-
David Axelrod made an interesting point after Trump first won in 2016. He said he advised Obama in 2008 that, after eight years of W, America was ready for the opposite. So he scripted Obama in part to be the anti-W. Axelrod said he couldn't really be as objective as he might have wished in 2016, since he loves Obama and detests Trump. But after Trump won he said he missed the reality staring him in the face. After eight years of Obama, Trump was the perfect anti-Obama. Arguably, Biden was the perfect anti-Trump in 2020. And Trump was the perfect anti-Biden in 2024. Weird shit! Ro Khanna slams Democrats’ behavior at Trump’s joint address: ‘Not a good look’ Every time Ro Khanna goes out on a minor limb and takes a risk, I like what he say to say. Partly because he is taking risks, period. If I had to name the biggest thing wrong with the Harris/Walz campaign, it would be what Tim Walz just said. The campaign played it way too safe. As if they were ahead in a race that they were actually behind or at best tied in every single day. It is time for Democrats to take risk. Beyond that, Khanna seems to be thinking, "How can I be the anti-Trump in a way that actually appeals to people?" My expectations for Trump 2.0 were extremely low. So I'm kind of impressed that Trump has actually exceeded my worst expectations of just how shitty a leader he can be. At this point, given his speed in breaking shit, some part of me feels like it is almost better to just break as much shit as he can. Hurt as many veterans as he can. Fuck as many seniors as he can. Be Putin's 100 % compliant bitch every day. And destroy every alliance that took a century to build. About half of America, so far, is getting a daily lesson is just how scummy and disgusting and traitorous Trump can be. And there ain't much anyone can do about it. Yet. Khanna seems to be one of the people trying to figure out what people might want to hear in 2028. He is not the only one. And I am not arguing he is the best one, or anywhere close. But he does impress me as someone who is thinking hard and taking risks with his eye on the prize for what might work in 2028. There's two things in particular that stand out in that article above, and in a lot of what Khanna says. One is that he seems to have taken both the 2002 and 2024 versions of Ruy Teixeira to heart. In 2002 Ruy and his leftie partner in crime John Judis improbably argued there was an emerging Democratic majority. For years now, climaxing in 2024, Ruy has been arguing woke college-educated progressives are ruining this majority by losing touch with the interests of the working class. Khanna seems to have read both books, and the weekly or so Teixeira memos on his Liberal Patriot blog. First by talking about things like patriotism, and respect. The second thing that stands out is that Khanna seems willing to push hard for the economic boilerplate things that Teixeira argues, correctly I think, Democrats need to focus on: working class economics. I can name two things that could have won 2024 for Democrats: 1) Tax the rich a lot more, which is the single most popular Democratic policy proposal most of the time; 2) Draw blood and fight like hell to extend the child tax credits that helped tens of millions of Hispanics and Blacks and working class Whites survive inflation. The Democrats let the tax credits die. And probably millions of those working class voters ended up reluctantly siding with Trump in the end. It made it easier for Trump to argue Democrats won't fight for the working class and put money in your pocket, but they will fight for prisoner sex changes at your expense. Khanna was on Team Bernie in 2020. He has proven adept at balancing representing rich people in Silicon Valley while he calls for pro-working class economics. And taxing the rich a lot more to help the working class. Now he says, correctly, we should focus like a laser on how Trump will cut Medicaid and blow up the deficit to help Elon Musk and billionaires. Again, I'm not saying Khanna is the best one for 2028, or even close. But he is ahead of the curve in laying out messaging and strategies Democrats better be focused on if we want to eventually end this national horror. Another thing I think is a given. After all the pain of watching Elon Musk kick veterans in the balls, slit Medicaid in the throat, and feed Tesla and SpaceX off Trump's federal slush fund tit, we'll be ready to put a pitchfork in the child abusing piece of shit by 2028. But since we're being respectful like Khanna, I won't say Musk is a worthless child abusing piece of shit who disgusts me. Even though he is. I'll just say we should raise the child abusing piece of shit's taxes to fund Medicaid and veterans, and child tax credits.
-
Who's counting any more. No offense, but Laura and Maria just don't compete with treason and betrayal. But it is nice to know even the entertainment portion of the betrayal and treason is a horror show, too.
-
Have to admit I am a bit disappointed, Sis. The AI is fine. I was just really looking forward to a sequel to Red White & Royal Blue. I didn't realize it was going to be Red White & Genocide.
-
You're funny. First, by Trump standards, I thought it was a good speech. One Republican strategist said Trump seemed relaxed and on a good vibe. I'd agree. But .......... This is a bit like elections in Russia ........................ RIGGED! And you are like Putin's liars in Russia. You leave out any facts that doesn't fit your lies and bullshit. It makes complete sense that Trump has now slipped into net disapproval after a bit more than a month. Even though he gave a speech his supporters loved. Of course when most of the people who watch the speech are Republicans, or "Independents" who use that word to say, "I'm for Trump, but don't want to be held accountable for it," that means most people watching the speech will approve of it. But, again, Trump was Trump at his best ............... entertaining, and even more long winded than me. You of course noticed Trump DID NOT talk about foreign policy much. Nor did he whine about everything his pal Vlad and him have been through. He knows people completely disagree with him on that. Even within his own party.
-
I almost cried when I saw that tonight. For the first time, Trump has net disapproval. The poor guy is slowing down. It took him a month longer to get to this point than when first blew his job in 2017. And on a night when he brought down the house with his wit, charm, and searing intelligence, no less! It is so unfair. He is so perfect. And, speaking of perfect, I was thinking @Barknaway has been doing a perfect job of spreading pro-Trump hate, lies, and ignorance. How could his strategy of plastering this website with hate, lies, and ignorance possibly have not worked? It's so unfair. He's the smartest impulsively reacting dog since Pavlov was around. I want to lend a hand, and I think we all should. I propose that we now give @Barknaway up to 5 treats a day, for every 100 videos he posts. i don't think 500 videos a day is asking too much. I have no idea how many he has posts, since everyone ignores them. So obviously we need more. I also think we need to combat a certain intellectual laziness in his scattershot approach, and focus him on the things we know work best: So: Two extra treats a day for saying anything hateful or wrong about trans children. One extra treat a day for saying anything hateful or wrong about anyone LGBTQ. Three extra treats for saying anything hateful or wrong about undocumented immigrants. (I'm already adding three treats for you saying that the measles outbreak in Texas was probably caused by immigrant children.) Can anyone else think of particularly hateful or ignorant things we want to give @Barknaway extra treats for? And, @Barknaway, could you be a pal and start a post that records how many videos you post every day? No one pays attention, or watches them. But we would like to know how to probably reward you. We deeply regret your failure. And we'd like to work with you to turn this around. Just like JD Vance is Ukraine's strongest ally, and will do anything for them.
-
The loyal piglet sounds like a warmonger. The loyal piglet Vance is loyal to Trump, who is loyal to Putin and authoritarianism. The loyal piglet is not for peace. The loyal piglet is also incredibly stupid. Maybe Trump only wanted someone stupider than him for his # 2 The loyal piglet disgusts me. When he is not busy destroying century old alliances built out of wars his whining ass never fought in, he is attacking Zelenskyy for supposedly not wanting peace. The sadistic and stupid logic of the loyal piglet is that Ukraine is the aggressor, and Putin is the peacemaker. Ukrainians who want security guarantees that a genocidal monster won't attack them again are simply against peace. What a sadist. This is insanely cruel to Ukraine. It is as if the traitorous stupid piglet wants to leave Ukraine as exposed as possible. How can the traitorous stupid piglet be against peacekeepers? The stupid traitorous piglet is a nightmare for Ukraine and peace, and a gift to Putin. The loyal piglet is stupid. And he has to think Ukrainians are really stupid to believe a line like that. It just shows what a stupid and horrible leader the loyal piglet would be. Trump just called Ukraine's leader a dictator. He blamed Ukraine for starting the invasion. He is taking Putin's side. He just announced he is freezing weapons delivery. The tough guys in the Republican Party are having verbal schizophrenia publicly agreeing with everything Zelenskyy says about Putin, and yet blaming him for saying it. And now the loyal piglet says you don't need Europe for security guarantees. Even though Trump said he wants Europe to handle security guarantees, since he sides with Putin. You just need us. And more vague and empty promises. Right, JD. Thanks for adding insult to injury. You just stabbed Ukraine in the back. And now your girly man ass is insulting them, and Europe as well. Vance is not only wrong, wrong, wrong. He is stupid. And a sadist. He is an embarrassment to the United State of America.
-
Trump halts aid to Ukraine The minerals deal is still on the table. So are deals with Russia. No shit! How do you figure? 😉 I assume the insolent pig's latest outburst is based on not liking the fact that leaders in Germany and France are actually calling him out for his betrayal of Ukraine and Europe. The thing that is nice about Trump is you really don't have to guess. He's just upfront in his recklessness, stupidity, and retribution. He is like a pissed off child. So it seems about 99 % clear that Ukraine will not get security guarantees from Trump. And that the insolent pig will do everything he can to ally with Putin. Despite the fact that only 4 % of Americans actually sympathize more with Putin on this issue, as shown in multiple polls. And, left to his own resources, at this point it is more than a reasonable guess that Trump will happily throw the security interests of both Ukraine and Europe under the bus. The fact that a pro-US conservative German leader is calling Trump out almost assures that is how Europe sees it. That's a recent Jan. 2025 poll on how people feel about pardoning the J6ers. I posted that because this is in the same ballpark. In my view, pardoning Putin for genocide is much worse than pardoning the J6ers for an attack on cops, and a peaceful transfer of power in a democracy. But both basically involve MAGA authoritarian followers being willing to say whatever their leader says is the truth. If Putin is the peacemaker, not the aggressor, than Trump must be right. And Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson must be wrong, too. But we'll pardon him, too. For now. That is how Trump and his loyal followers roll. Ian Bremmer argued in that article about that European leaders better pander to Trump quick, if they want to avoid a "full rapprochement" between "the Americans and Russians". I'm pretty sure Starmer and Macron and Merz will dance that dance soon. If only to say they gave it a whirl. But Trump has made it as clear as he can that he and Putin are allies. They share an aligned "vision" - to quote his pals in Russia. And that is the way it is. What's not to like about authoritarianism? That poll above is probably a good guess of how many Americans will go along with it.
-
May I have a side of measles with my MAGA, please?
stevenkesslar replied to stevenkesslar's topic in Politics
It's better you just post videos, @Barknaway. Because when you open your mouth, you just spout ignorance and hate and stupidity. Yup, blame everything on immigrants. I'm stupid. I'm a hater. Blame the fucking immigrants! I have no facts. I just post lie after lie after lie after lie every day. But fuck! I'm MAGA now. I can say any ignorant thing I want and it has to be true. One of many reasons I stopped watching your videos is that in a number of them somewhat honest posters admit this is just some shit I read on the internet. I have no idea whether it is true or not. But pass it along. You folks prize ignorance like a badge of honor. There is an obvious common denominator here. It is not immigrant status. It is vaccination status. The dead American child, and most of the children affected, have that in common. Not vaccinated. Texas is not releasing the immigration status of the children, or their names. I think they think the important fact here is that they're not vaccinated. But what do health experts know? The non-ignorant bright idea here is that vaccinated children likely won't catch or spread measles from other kids, whether they are immigrants or not. And they won't die. And by the way, Trump is POTUS now. And measles spreads quickly. So this is on Trump. Since MAGA blamed Biden for the death of anyone an immigrant killed, if you think this may have been because of an immigrant - with no proof - then you should blame Trump for the child's death. If some immigrant child crossed the border with measles and spread it, that had to have happened while Trump was POTUS. More likely, it is a direct result of the lack of vaccination. But that would mean Trump is accountable. We can't have that! Facts and bright ideas just get in the way of your ignorance and hate campaign. So go back to your videos. You have a lot of work to do. Trump is getting less popular by the day. Ever wonder why? IGNORANT LIAR -
No one knows for sure. But the most likely explanation for the insolent pig's outburst is that he wanted a political win last Friday. If that is true, he should be pissed at his own Vice President and his own temper for fucking that up. Is it possible the insolent pig and his recklessness is his own worst enemy? That would sure be a shocker, wouldn't it? 🤪 All Trump did is expose that his stupid and vain brain sucks at making deals. I think it is better for the world and Ukraine and Europe if they just make deals around Trump, for a while. The ego and stupidity of the insolent pig can be manipulated to bring him on board later. What a humiliating embarrassment that this vain insolent pig is our leader!
-
Trump and Zelenskyy’s White House clash a ‘deliberate escalation’ by US, says Germany’s Merz U.S. president’s rage was pre-planned, likely next chancellor says. The insolent pig Trump is a traitor. The insolent pig Trump is stupid and vain. Thanks to his stupidity and vanity and ego and recklessness, he is destroying our alliances with Europe. The insolent pig Trump is breaking America.