Jump to content
Gay Guides Forum

AdamSmith

Deceased
  • Posts

    18,271
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    320

Everything posted by AdamSmith

  1. Jason, putting my foolishness aside, you were in my mind as I posted this. I remembered you had posted about your relationship, and also the recent thread on daddy's about keeping oneself as a bottom for the private relationship. Besides lust, one has to have great respect for TVTSs and the courage it takes for them to go through life. Long live.
  2. Too absurd, but I could not resist noting the felicitous phrasing of today's home-page announcement by the TenderMoments4u agency: ...a selection of gorgeous Transvestites on top of our beautiful escorts. As a TVTS lover, I love that image.
  3. Flattery will get you everywhere. I ought to add, as both excuse and shameless tease, that I will pull myself together and get back to posting in earnest once I recover from The Trip. Oz's largesse helped fund 60 hours with Andre in NYC last week. Details when, as I say, concentration returns. If ever.
  4. This Tar Heel is embarrassed to have had no idea. (Even though Carolina Rice refers to the South Carolina low country product, not to North Carolina.) (And though North Carolina -- historically a relatively poor sharecrop-oriented agricultural economy compared with the prosperous plantation systems of South Carolina and Virginia -- thus sometimes styled itself "a vale of humility between two mountains of conceit.") Quite apart, the IMDB article on Janette Davis includes a link to Red Skelton's entry. About whom a new thread...?
  5. Antonyms for "obscure" are one thing. The torrent of words that the above conjures is altogether another, and not fit to mention in a family venue such as this.
  6. And, behind them all, the Ur-texts: http://www.bluegrasswest.com/ideas/carter.htm http://www.cmt.com/artists/az/carter_family/artist.jhtml
  7. What?! Our greatest folk poet save Bob Dylan? Obscure? Them's fightin' words! Anything to combat that deadliest foe of all -- terminal boredom.
  8. Finally a fit subject for theological debate! Of course the canonical way to tell that we're in Tennessee is when I smell frost on cotton leaves And I feel that Southern breeze. ...or when the contamination alarm goes off as one passes through the detector at the end of one's shift at Oak Ridge.
  9. That, obliquely, says something or other about Intelligent Design. Or at least, per Stu's remark, about deism. ...which (deism) has always struck me as the least gratifying way to be deity. Even if a lot less aggravating than the petulant, small-company shop-foreman micromanagement style of Yahweh in the Old Testament.
  10. All those still get way under my skin. What I value most in religions are all the human needs that they so beautifully (if also, often enough, horrifically and destructively) articulate and give form to. Even if the choices we make in fulfilling those needs are, as you say, frequently choices of pathology and self-deception. Or worse.
  11. Accurate; nuanced; beautiful. My preference for "confounds" is projection of my own emotion, at the cost of fidelity to the source. Unsure why, but a comfort to hear that.
  12. This failed Southern Baptist would see you and raise you one. Sensible attitude. I know it; wish I could feel it. At the very least, I would like a more reasonable life span. Say, 250 years. That would give us time to make our first mistaken tries at the life projects; then, with the lessons learned, go again and have some shot at getting closer to what we meant. And maybe a coda in which we really manage to distill the good stuff. We could have a whole seminar on that. Beyond the Persians, at the center of all mischief was Paul. Uprooting the historical Jesus from his Judaic soil, and replanting the whole shebang in the entirely foreign ground of Paul's Neoplatonic and Hellenized learning, which split body from soul and pitted one against the other. Rewriting the here-and-now transformative social gospel of the peasant revolutionary into a crude supernaturalizing fixation on bodily resurrection and literal afterlife. My prejudices are showing.
  13. I don't fear the time after: I fear time present's ending. Your view is too Eastern for me. An atheist, I am still inescapably of the Judeo-Christian line. What are the Old and New Testaments alike, if not a cry to heaven for more life, into a time without boundaries?
  14. As used in: http://www.bartleby.com/101/21.html I prefer the translation: The fear of death confounds me.
  15. One suspects and hopes Obama & Co. will get far on a lot of issues via the tactic of slipping it in a little bit at the time.
  16. Not to mention, courtly demeanor notwithstanding, Roberts.
  17. A lady never discusses money. Except to observe one should buy in bulk whenever possible.
  18. This little excursus is not The Trip. Details thereof have yet to be decided. Just yesterday kevin6669 sent me more photos of beautiful Thai boys from his last visit there, with notes on what $50 a night buys in that clime. So many choices! The Seer of Hartford notwithstanding.
  19. He is going to be with me, ameliorating the pain of a business conference, from tomorrow evening through Saturday. I'll ask him which he prefers -- separate, or all together. Which is actually to say: he who hesitates is lost! Much less he who sits around waiting to win a contest. And I am unanimous in that.
  20. ...time to become Quakers? Ten important kisses in history By Maggie Koerth-Baker Mental Floss Pucker up as we explore 10 smooches that changed religion, art, culture, and history. 1. The Kiss of Judas: A betrayal or just misunderstood? Nothing ends a good "bromance" quite like flagrant, murderous betrayal. A long time ago, a wandering preacher named Jesus was doing pretty well for himself -- building up a following and promoting religious teachings -- until one of his buddies sold him out to the authorities. In exchange for 30 pieces of silver, Judas Iscariot kissed Jesus on the cheek and, by doing so, identified him to Roman soldiers. Although Judas double-crossed his best friend for a paltry sum, some scholars argue that Judas is the secret hero of Christianity. The claim is based on a recent translation of The Gospel of Judas, a text written by Jesus' followers a couple hundred years after his death. In 1978, a farmer discovered the mysterious text in Egypt and sold it to an antiques dealer. Years later, a National Geographic Society team got hold of it. They restored and analyzed the document, and in 2006, they announced that the text painted Judas as a man of valor. According to their interpretation, he was actually Jesus' most trusted friend, because he agreed to fake a betrayal so that Jesus could die a martyr and then be resurrected. Soon after the National Geographic Society released its findings, other scholars started picking the interpretation apart. Chief among them was April D. DeConick, a Rice University biblical studies professor, who claimed the team made some critical errors, including translating several passages to mean the exact opposite of what they were intended to communicate. DeConick contends that the Gospel says Judas was a "demon" rather than a "spirit," as interpreted by National Geographic, and that he was set apart "from the holy generation" rather than "for the holy generation." With just a few tweaks in translation, Judas has gone right back to playing the bad guy. 2. The kisses you can share with a Quaker The Religious Society of Friends, or Quakers, is a small Christian sect best known for rejecting all forms of violence, embracing progressive politics, and dedicating themselves to simple, restrained living. They've promoted a more harmonious world by founding causes such as Amnesty International, not to mention lending their name to oatmeal. So we were surprised to learn that when teenage Quakers get together, their favorite activity is a free-for-all kissing game that often ends in bruising and rug burn. Alternately known as Ratchet Screwdriver, Bloody Winkum, or Wink, the game dates back to the early 1900s. To play, participants divide themselves into girl/boy pairs with one boy left over to be the "Winker." The pairs sit on the floor, with each boy hugging a girl from behind. When the Winker winks at a girl, she tries to scramble across the room to kiss him, while her male partner does his best to hold her back. Hilarity (and release of pent-up sexual frustration) ensues. But not everyone finds this game so hilarious. In 2002, the Children & Young People's Committee of the Quakers in Britain issued a statement discouraging the game at official functions. And while that may not seem surprising, the reasoning is. The committee frowns upon the game because younger children and adults don't get to play, thus making it ageist. Due to their egalitarian values, Quakers seldom segregate by age at get-togethers, and the committee didn't want the very young or the very old to feel left out. 3. The kiss that proved no means no Gentlemen, a word: When a lady rejects your advances, you'd do best to listen. Take, for example, the story of Thomas Saverland, an English gentleman who was at a party in 1837 and, as a joke, kissed Miss Caroline Newton by force. In response, she bit off a chunk of his nose. Saverland took her to court, where the judge found his case more hilarious than harrowing. The judge ruled, "When a man kisses a woman against her will, she is fully entitled to bite off his nose, if she so pleases." A smart-mouthed barrister then added, "and eat it up, if she has a fancy that way." 4. The kiss that said "welcome to America!" At the turn of the 20th century, immigration processing at Ellis Island was quite an ordeal. Immigrants had to prove they weren't carrying any of a long list of illnesses, mental impairments, or moral defects. If you were sick (and it was curable), then you'd be detained in the hospital until you got better. The whole process could take hours, days, or months. And even then, you could be turned back. Also, ladies traveling alone and anyone with less than $20 in their pockets had to wait for a sponsor or family member to meet them. If no one was there to greet you, you were sent back. Of course, all of this was further complicated by the fact that immigrants couldn't go down to the pay phone and call Aunt Bertha when they landed. Instead, when relatives heard that the right ship had docked, they trucked over to Ellis Island and waited desperately by the Kissing Post -- a giant wooden column just outside the room where the final stages of immigration took place. Ellis Island staffers gave the Kissing Post its name because families and lovers were generally swept up in emotion as they reconnected with their long losts. Today, the Kissing Post continues to be a symbol of hope and togetherness as the pillar that supports the American Family Immigration History Center. If you're one of the 100 million Americans descended from immigrants who passed through Ellis Island, there's a good chance the History Center there can help you find a picture of the ship that carried your ancestors. 5. The Eskimo kiss: A tale taller than the abominable snowman Popular wisdom claims that Eskimos rub noses because kissing on the lips would cause their mouths to freeze together. Not only is this completely untrue, but Eskimos don't rub noses at all. The myth of the Eskimo kiss was created by Hollywood in an early "documentary" called Nanook of the North, which took America by storm in 1922. To film it, director Robert J. Flaherty recorded real Inuits in the Arctic. However, in order to accommodate the huge, awkward cameras of the day, he staged all the scenes and built a three-sided igloo for interior shots. Nanook, the main character, wasn't really named Nanook, and the women playing his wives weren't really his wives. As for the term "Eskimo kiss," that too was constructed by Flaherty to explain how one of the wives was nuzzling her baby. In actuality, the woman was giving her baby a kunik, an expression of affection in Inuit culture. Typically in kuniks, adults press the sides of their noses against the cheeks of their babies and breathe in their scent. Who kuniks whom differs from culture to culture, but it's never a romantic gesture. Inuits kiss on the lips, just like everyone else. 6. The first guy-on-guy kiss to hit the big screen Movie experts often credit Sunday Bloody Sunday, a 1971 film about a love triangle among two guys and a girl, with being the first mainstream feature film to depict two gay men kissing. That's true, but it wasn't the first time two guys kissed on screen. Apparently, straight men had been doing it for decades. In 1927, two soldiers kissed tenderly in the silent movie "Wings", which won Best Picture at the first Academy Awards. When the film was released, no one raised an eyebrow about the scene, partially because kissing in the trenches was remarkably common during World War I. According to British Academy Postdoctoral Fellow Dr. Santanu Das, letters and accounts of the war are peppered with stories of soldiers kissing, embracing, and giving each other pet names like "my Palestine Wife." Das believes the war succeeded in breaking down the traditional limits on emotional and physical intimacy between men, allowing soldiers to form relationships that went beyond what was permissible at home. While it's surprising to us today, that Wings scene didn't even cause a stir in 1920s America. 7. The kiss that gave artists their 15 minutes If it weren't for kissing, Andy Warhol might never have become The King of Pop Art. In 1963, Warhol was still a little-known commercial illustrator. But that all changed when he bought a silent-film camera and started shooting his friends and acquaintances kissing in unbroken, four-minute-long shots. The result was a series called Kiss, which took the art world by storm. In fact, New York's Gramercy Arts Theater played a new "kiss" each week. The series helped cement Warhol's place in the artsy underground, and it also launched the careers of several kissers. 8. The prepubescent kiss that changed the law When first-grader Johnathan Prevette pecked his classmate on the cheek in Lexington, North Carolina, he quickly became a poster boy for everything that was wrong with America in 1996. After Johnathan's classmate complained to a teacher, the 6-year-old was taken out of class for the day, missing an ice cream party. When the school told Johnathan's parents that he'd violated the sexual harassment rules, a media circus followed. Critics pointed to the Prevette case as a sign that political correctness had gone too far, adding that innocent play didn't deserve such harsh punishments. After all, pundits asked, is a child really capable of sexual harassment? But while Johnathan was making headlines, another legal battle was raging. A 10-year-old Georgia girl named LaShonda Davis had been repeatedly groped by a bully in her class, to the point where she contemplated suicide. She told several of the teachers at her school, but no one did anything. LaShonda's parents had to call the police -- and sue the school --before the abuse stopped. Both Johnathan and LaShonda deserved protection under the law, and both cases played a role in molding the current standards. In response to the Johnathan Prevette case, the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights issued new guidelines for identifying sexual harassment by putting the emphasis on common sense and telling schools to take age and maturity into account. But there was still a big question about whether schools should be accountable for students harassing each other. When LaShonda's case went to the Supreme Court in 1999, their answer was yes, sort of. The Court decided that schools can be blamed, but only if they learn of the abuse and do nothing to stop it. 9. The kiss that could send you to jail In the city of Guanajuato, Mexico, there's a smooching spot called el Callejón del Beso, or the Alley of the Kiss. According to local legend, the alley was once the final scene of a tragic love affair. A young woman and her lover were meeting there to run away together, but when her father discovered them, he stabbed his daughter in the heart. As she lay dying, her lover kissed her hand for the last time, and the alley got its name. Today, it's said that anyone who kisses there will have seven years of happiness. Thanks to its romantic history, the alley has become a popular tourist attraction, although that's starting to change. On January 20, 2009, the ultra-conservative mayor of Guanajuato authorized a new municipal ordinance cracking down on public displays of affection. If he has his way, lip-locking in the open will carry with it a fine of $100 and up to 36 hours in jail. 10. The most Iconic kiss in history On August 14, 1945, thousands of men and women embraced one another in New York City's Times Square to celebrate victory over Japan. But two people -- a sailor and a nurse -- locked lips at just the right moment and became larger than life. More than a dozen men and at least three women claim to be the kissers in Alfred Eisenstaedt's photograph. Of the men, our favorite is George Mendonça, a Rhode Island fisherman and World War II navy recruit, who claims he grabbed the strange nurse and kissed her right in front of his girlfriend. In fact, Mendonça says his girlfriend, now his wife, is in the background of the photo. While the mystery will probably never be solved, Alfred Eisenstaedt has left us with a juicy back story. In his autobiography, the famed photographer writes that he followed around a sailor who moved through the crowd, kissing anything wearing a skirt. When the sailor hit on a nurse whose white dress contrasted nicely with his dark suit, Eisenstaedt snapped the shot. But he failed to get their names. Coincidentally, another photographer, Victor Jorgensen, took the same shot from a slightly different angle and also forgot to get the subjects' names. Jorgensen's version ran in the next day's New York Times, but as a working military photographer at the time, he didn't own the rights to his work. So while Eisenstaedt received glory and royalty checks for his image, Jorgensen simply got a nice clipping to hang on his fridge. http://www.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/wayoflife/0...sses/index.html
  21. You (compliment, you understand) perv!
  22. For this I will buy you a week with Andre. Tho I understand Cody is no longer available into the bargain. On daddy's forum, this argument has been made intelligently and eloquently (and persistently!) by Tom Isern. I happen to disagree, and have said so in perhaps too acid terms. I see his view as an elitist, privileged point of view, available in practicability only to a few. The reason for my disagreement is that the protections of federally recognized civil marriage for same-sex couples would benefit not only us (I) who are economically and electorally well off, but more importantly the least protected, most vulnerable among us. You're right. It is presumptuous of anyone to assume, or pretend, to think or represent for you. But to your legitimate question about supporting vs. denouncing Obama: Unlike mass-cultural-representation figures, in the political arena one is offered choices of A or B. One chooses, full-throatedly, either A or B, based on which is closer to,and more likely convicable to enact, one's own positions. Then, after the chosen has cemented its power, one may, depending on the tripartite (checks and balances) disposition of power, begin at higher volume or lower to petition for redress.
  23. At the time DADT was put into place, my guess was Clinton was pulling a shrewd one: Once the policy was thus recast to acknowledge that gay people can be effective in military service as long as straight colleagues don't know their orientation, I thought it would become easy for some legal challenge to push it to the next step -- the self-evident conclusion that this is the very definition of prejudice: something that exists purely in the state of mind of the dominant group. Naive me.
  24. On t'other hand, I just Googled up the phrase "choice is an illusion". The results brought on vertigo.
  25. Ah -- the "Peel me a grape!" scenario.
×
×
  • Create New...