Think my point was: if you are one, then you know one when you see it.
Agree Todd is very good, but he has seemed needlessly as Christie described him annoying as a debate moderator.
Whatever you mean by ‘context’ (in this particular ‘context’ ) is one thing, and factual basis is entirely something else.
What do you mean, in plain English?
They are pretty well factually documented in the Mueller report.
Not to mention in the press record simply of things Trump himself publicly said of his own actions and motives.
Counterexamples, please?
I think we wait and see a little bit. The preferences of old vs young black voters skew very differently. From my firsthand convos in various Uber/Lyft rides, among a number of other places where these things are vigourusly debated.
‘The takeaway from the two debates is simple: It is Bernie Sanders’ party. It was Kamala Harris’ star turn. It was Joe Biden’s nightmare. And it’s Elizabeth Warren's nomination to lose.’
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/06/28/dem-debate-winners-losers-roundup-227245
Side note. Strikes me that I am plagiarizing here from the philosopher Wittgenstein, who put it far better:
’A thing is what it is, and not something else.’
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_Wittgenstein
Hollywood Madam: Want to stop human trafficking? Legalize consensual sex for money.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/voices/2019/02/27/robert-kraft-affidavit-details-threesome-sandwich-indictment-police-report-column/2982383002/