floridarob

If you only knew 👼

was invitation only and I got a multi year deal since I've been around since the site started....

Same can be said for the other way around....how many times a Thai (or other foreigner, including Aussies/Brits) say something in English and we don't have a clue to what they are saying 😝

Please refer to your photo....

Since I signed up for the premium plan, it's been fine for me 🤷‍♂️

Must've been some first meeting with @Olddaddy 🧐

or taken?

Is that what you call that position 👼

These type of things happen more frequently than you'd think at hotels all around the world...Like I told Peter, no one's perfect, the people in glass houses thing? You guys all been bragging about this hotel for so long, now you're surprised that the rates are higher...you know those popular go-go's asking 5000 THB, same theory 🤷‍♂️

But room size..... overcompensating?

Try adding the nit noi after a pause..... the look of their faces makes me laugh so much, but you have to say it seriously so they're unsure if your joking or not 😝

Don’t feel bad or old. If it were @PeterRS2, “reaching out” would probably be a little too modern. He’d more likely “send word by carrier pigeon, followed by a detailed six-page explanation of why everyone else is wrong.” 😝

You should've taken your pants off, so all of you were in your briefs....assuming you wear any at all...... then start that as a new trend in the bars, it'd be Lovely 😉

Thanks for actually naming the forum members who were there instead of using the clandestino “Forum Member 1” and “Forum Member 2” method. 🙏 Although one important detail is still missing… which Olddaddy showed up? With all those personalities, “Olddaddy” doesn’t really narrow it down much. And don’t you feel better now that you’ve met him in person? His posts might finally start making a little more sense. Probably not, but there’s always hope. 😂

That's my understanding.... “Law” (handsome) has a low tone and is pronounced more like “loor” than “law”. I usually say to someone I like ....Khun Loor.... a pause and then Nit Noi.....always gets a surprised reaction, They reply "Only Nit Noi ?" 😝

Thank you for the new link. Ironically, it confirms the correction rather than your original wording..... AirInsight says Lufthansa is preparing to reject “some of the early-built 777-9 aircraft allocated to it” and that Emirates “already refused the first 10 777-9s built for its fleet.” It does not say Emirates rejected “10 of its first 11 orders.” Aircraft allocated to an airline and orders placed by an airline are not the same thing 🤷‍♂️ So I wasn’t merely “adding additional points not in the newspaper articles.” I was pointing out that what you wrote did not accurately reflect what the articles said 🧐 If you’re going to emphasize how carefully you proofread your posts, surely checking that your summary actually matches the source is part of the proofreading 😉 I guess the lesson is that mistakes are easy to make and nobody is perfect. Probably worth remembering the next time you get worked up wondering how someone could possibly post something without proofreading it first or tagging the wrong person. 😝

Glad you realized Sept would be too much rain.

You've also vowed that you always carefully proofread every post you make.... You may want to give this one another careful proofread 🧐 The FAA says the directive affects 471 U.S.-registered aircraft, not 451. It applies to certain Boeing 737-8, 737-9 and 737-8200 aircraft. The 737-8200 is part of the MAX family, essentially the higher-capacity MAX 8 variant. It is not the older 737-800. So the claim that this directive also covers the older 737-800 comes from misreading the aircraft designation ✈️ The 777X section also needs correcting. Emirates has not rejected “10 of its first 11 orders.” It is refusing particular early-build airframes produced for the airline. The Aviation Week article you linked says the first 10, while another Aviation Week report describes the initial group as 10 or 11. Either way, they are aircraft, not “orders,” and they were not all built in 2019. Three were built in 2019, four in 2020 and three in 2021 📅 Sir Tim Clark is also the President of Emirates Airline, not its chairman. Emirates’ Chairman and Chief Executive is Sheikh Ahmed bin Saeed Al Maktoum. Boeing has plenty of genuine problems worth criticizing without confusing the 737-8200 with the 737-800, getting the number of affected aircraft wrong, calling early-build airframes “orders,” claiming they were all built in 2019 and giving Tim Clark the wrong job title 🤷‍♂️ And while we are carefully proofreading, it is spelled “worryingly,” not “Worryingy.” 😝

Last century news ....

So you're on that side of the world...I must've mixed up your calendar.

I tell guys that I'm not gay....while they're fucking me, So I understand the dilema 😉

VS paying an unknown amount of rent for a lifetime? I think they have a maximum number or days a trip could be for coverage, during that time..30-60 days...something like that, it doesn't cover an entire year abroad. Don't give @Olddaddy any ideas, he'll go to running across the busy street instead of taking a Grab now 😲

Is like trying to play connect the dots and remember who is/was with who in BKK or where ever at the same time.....🤷‍♂️

When you're older, grayer and more experienced....you'll look back at these times and wonder, wtf was I thinking?

Same morning or next morning?