PeterRS

With the perfectly ghastly, snake-like Roy Cohn as his mentor, Trump was certainly never good. Down in hell, Cohn will be exhilarated at how well his pupil is doing!

As I wrote in another thread, in the USA it all comes down to money. Cash is king. As long as they have their own money or it is being fed to them by the mass of special interests, bigots, liars, cheats, scammers and the whole host of rotten humanity is provided with a platform to spew out their dirt. It's called "free speech" in the USA. And as I wrote yesterday, unless free speech is guarded by a host of caveats, people like Kirk and Bannon and Trump and many, many others - including those calling themselves Christians whose churches happen not to have to pay taxes - have an open playing field. We had a thread recently about the televangelists prompted by the death of the loathsome Jimmy Swaggart. These men used the airwaves to con millions to enrich themselves. They did not as a result murder anyone as far as I know. But the crazies in the USA are now basically using exactly the same tools. The result has been murder, and it will continue if @floridarob's peaceful future has any hope of happening.

Interesting point made in several of today's media. The presence of American troops in Qatar and its largest air base in the Gulf States with all the intelligence capability surrounding them failed to stop Israel breaching Qatari defences - and by extension US defences. Other Gulf states have noted this very strongly.

I find this post total rubbish. How anyone can claim that the 2nd amendment is applicable in 2025 and that guns manufactured for the battlefield can be used on American streets in a country where there are more firearms than people is, in my view, ridiculous! Equally the freedom of speech amendment is total nonsense UNLESS it is accompanied by a whole host of caveats. Charlie Kirk believed in anarchy. Full stop!

As I have written elsewhere, I started my career as a general trainee with the BBC. In those far off days, standards were high and the BBC news department in particular was particularly regarded worldwide for its quality and accuracy. I cannot speak of BBC television today for the little I see is on an annual two week visit to the UK. The World Service on BBC radio used to be broadcast around the clock each day. The foreign language news programmes used to broadcast in 45 different languages several times a day. I understand the English Service is still in existence but the number of languages for foreign language news has been reduced to 27. That apart, and accepting that there have been a few scandals as with programmes on the pedophile Jimmy Savile after his death and most recently its fired primary television news reader for exchanging indecent images of underage boys, I am told by former colleagues that the quality of most of its news-type programmes is still pretty high. The quality of some of its senior management and its own internal reporting standards need revamping, but there is seemingly no desire to dumb down as with any networks eslsewhere. But the recent programme on Thailand is clearly a major exception. Complaining to the BBC through its complaints page is a useless exercise in frustration. I happen to enjoy badminton, but while its sports pages have a dedicated badminton page, it never reviews the world's main badminton events. It is also massively out of date. The last "news" item about badminton is on 8 March 2020! Complain and it advises your letter will be passed to heads of departments. Then you get a mail saying these people do not agree. I do not believe any of the complaint letters actually are read by anyone. Heads need to be bashed together - but it will never happen.

I remember chatting with some Japanese and Taiwanese guys around ten years ago. They were in their own groups of 2 or 3 and the conversation developed around nightlife. I asked what they liked most about Bangkok. The universal opinion was that all planned in their separate groups to go for massages, then to a gogo bar and finally to a disco like DJ Station. I rather innocently asked what type of boys they liked to take off from the bars. None, was the answer. They only went to see the shows. None of them had ever offed a guy! Going to a disco to end the evenings was the priority. Given that this was the relatively new market starting to invade the gay scene in Thailand, it made me just a litte concerned about the future. Bars with boys for offs would obviously survive with the western tourists who still visited in some numbers and other individual Asians. But if a majority of Asians were not in the market for offs, I wondered how the bars would survive in the longer term. I still wonder!

Dropping a relatively ingenue reporter into Thailand and expecting them to make a series of programmes that will convey the reality of life in the country is a typical BBC habit, it seems. There are plenty of reporters, some like Jonathan Head who has been based in Bangkok for more than 20 years, who work for the BBC and who could do what I am certain would be a much better job. But he knows the pitfalls and the corruption and the police and the laws. He would probably turn such an assignment down. On the other hand, there are some excellent BBC reporters. I think particularly of two the BBC managed to infiltrate into Myanmar - the latest being Quentin Sommerville last year - who really gave viewers a far better idea of what real life was like with the militias fighting the junta forces.

I have been to only one Michelin-starred restaurant in my life, although several times. That prints its basic menu for checking in advance. It also has a relatively short list of daily specials inside. There are certain foods that I utterly dislike and that is one reason for my wanting to know what is being served. I have been to two or three very fine restaurants in different countries with no menus whatever. You just take the set menu of the day. But I am one of probably just a few that loathe oysters, for example, and if the starter happened to be oyster based, my meal would be all but ruined.

Which adjective would I use? Inevitable. I had never heard of this guy, not being an American, but I know well there are enough nuts, especially extreme right-wing ones, that at some point someone was going to attempt murder. A huge problem with extremist leaders like Trump is that they only encourage counter extemes. And in a country like the USA where there are more guns than people, the urge for one - or indeed some - to express their beliefs in the most extreme way by resorting to a firearm is in my view inevitable. I am sad for this man's family and loved ones, but I am even more sad for all those innocent people who over the years have been murdered by guns. What I now fear most is that we are going to witness more extreme cases of the counter extreme. So far, it seems to me, the war in the USA has ben a a war of words. Now it is a war of death and, again in my view, no amount of increasing protection is going to stop the further violence that will result. And to extend the premise a little further, Trump's extremism will not stop at the USA's borders. We have already witnessed the utter madness of the crook Netanyahu bombing Israel's ally Qatar. This tiny nation state has problably - but this is clearly a guess as none of us know the real facts - done more to get Israeli hostages released than any other, a typical Arab state which Israel has traditionally condemned in past decades. It is also a large base for American troops. Now the Prime Minister of Qatar has furiously stated that Israel has "killed all hope" that Hamas will ever release the remaining israeli hostages. For how much longer will Israel's moderate population put up with a leader intent on wiping out many tens of thousands of Palestinians, on the utter destruction of the Palestinian State, and continually kowtow to the very small group of ultra-right wing aggressive Orthodox Jews in his country? We all know that the root cause of all the fighting is to keep Netanyahu out of jail. Yet how many have been slaughtered in that process? That the world in general has stood by and allowed this to happen is an atrocity in itself. Have we all gone stark raving mad? Have we lost all sense of proportion, of shame, and of sheer human decency?

I have never used poppers but many years ago I did bring some into Thailand as I have a Thai friend who loves using them. Before my fight, I tore off all the wrappings placed a couple inside shoes covered by dirty socks and others in my toiletries bag with a lot of other materials. Surprisingly my bag was opened at BKK but the check was cursory at best. However, checks now may be more rigorous since popers are highly flammable.

Never use such apps. But I honestly cannot believe you are so incredibly busy that you have no time to read the forum. You have made many, many dozens of posts so clearly you had time to make them and read many of the responses! Do you have a new job? Or do you now spend so much more of your time looking up gay travel sites to answer some of your questions?

Absolutely not!

I wonder if they now feel the extra large bribes (oops fees) he must have paid them to lie were worth it.

I suspect a lot of people will be watching this time to ensure that he is actually in a prison and not in a VIP hospital suite. Perhaps his recent trip outside the country was to collect a good amount of cash to try and buy his way out of prison. But I doubt if this time he will be successful.

The Supreme Court of Thailand has sentenced Thaksin to jail for one year. It ruled that his previous prison term was a sham. At that time, on his first day he complained of feeling ill and was taken to the VIP Wing of a hospital where he spent the entire period of his jail term in a great degree of comfort before being pardoned after 6 months. The Supreme Court ruled this was unlawful and Thaksin was not in fact ill. That case is known in Thailand as the "14th Floor" case as it was on that floor in the hospital where Thaksin lived in a degree of luxury. Last week Thaksin flew on a private jet to his second home in Dubai allegedly to receive medical treatment. He must have assumed that by returning he could escape a prison term. He must now be wishing he had not come back! The Thaksin political dynasty has finally suffered what must surely be a fatal blow. Sic transit . . . .!

Poppers are illegal in Thailand - and in several other Asian countries. If you buy on the streets, I suspect there is a very good chance they are fake.

It also appears he was not only alone at the time he made the jump, he had been alone in his room all day. It also states "luxury" hotel. That would indicate he could have had a certain degree of wealth, either that or he blew his savings before ending everything. As far as the sound from above is concerned I would not count on the Pattaya Mail's reporting being accurate. Presumably it was an eye witness statement when the poor man's landing might have sounded as though it had come from above. The attached article from another news outlet says nothing about sound from above - merely "a loud noise from meters away". It also ooints out a Chinese fell to his death just last Sunday. Why the British man fell can only be a matter of speciulation. Boy friend problems? Girl friend problems? Health issues? Acute depression for another reason? Probaby we'll never know. It makes me wonder, though. What facilities exist in Pattaya for foreigners to consult suicide hotlines (if any) or psychiatrists about issues with which they are struggling mentally? https://www.thaiexaminer.com/thai-news-foreigners/2025/09/08/uk-man-the-latest-foreign-tourist-to-die-in-high-rise-balcony-fall-in-nong-prue-pattaya-last-saturday/

For virtually the first time in decades, the Myanmar junta's army is losing both territory and manpower. Consequently it is also losing much-needed cash. The various militias have gained a lot of ground fighting largely with hope and without proper military gear. The junta uses its air force to try and keep its territory, and primarily as a result of a large number of desertions conscription is now fully in force, even to the extent of men being hauled off the streets in major cities to become soldiers. Most recent supplies to the junta's air force have come from Russia in the form of six advanced Su-30MSE fighter jets. The purchase was financed by a Russian loan and was made necessary due to problem issues with older Chinese military aircraft. The junta maintains that these jets will be used to maintain the country's territorial integrity, but it is well known from various sources that they have been used against anti-junta militia forces The junta has a wide assortment of fighter jets and military helicopters in its arsenal. In the 1990s it bought 20 Mil Mi-2 and PZL W-3 Sokol helicopters from Poland and 13 Mil Mi-17 from Russia. In 2001 it bought 12 MIG-29 fighter aircraft from Belarus. This was followed by an additional order of 20 MiG-29s as part of a $570 million defence package in December 2009. 10 MiG-29Bs were upgraded to SM standard in 2017. The air force also ordered 10 Mil Mi-35 gunship helicopters as part of a $71 million defence package signed in December 2009. Private airlines have also been forced to hand over to the government a number of French-made ATR turbo prop aircraft which have been adapted for military use. All this has to be paid for! And given the strike power of the airforce, it is remarkable how successful the militias have been.

Many thanks for this. I knew Ronan Farrow had been investigating Epstein for a long time but thought it was only for articles in the magazine he writes for. Just downloaded this book on kindle.

Appalling and disgraceful! And only because the Repulicans already thin majority in the House would have been reduced even further. Lord Acton stated in the 19th century, "Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely." Before she became a fallen angel, Aung Sang Suu Kyi stated in 1989 that Lord Acton was wrong. What he should have said is that "Fear of losing power corrupts those who wield it."

There is a long and fascinating article about the Myanmar scam centres on today's Guardian website, although it considerably underestimates the number of trafficked workers there compared to other official estimates. The earlier discussions in this thread outline most of the points. But this map created with drone footage with the known scam centres, increased in the recent past from 11 to 27, marked as red dots illustrates the scale of the problem. And this of the totally new scam city at named KK Park south of Myawaddy. Photo Jittrapon Kaicome/The Guardian on-line One who was rescued from KK Park remains traumatised by his experience. If feels "like all the evil in this world" exists inside these compounds, he told the Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2025/sep/08/myanmar-military-junta-scam-centres-trafficking-crime-syndicates-kk-park

It is a trait which many westerners and non-Asians fall into, especially if they are only visiting on vacation. Those who live in Asia soon get used to the sometimes subtle differences in conversation and social interaction found in different Asian countries.

One point I failed to mention earlier. A lot of people think that sitting in the shade under a sun umbrella will stop them getting either a tan or sunburn. Most will stop some of the harming sun's rays from getting to the skin but they do not shield you from rays reflected from surrounding surfaces. Always use sunscreen even under a sun umbrella.

I regret your recollection is not so good and your earlier post absolutely does not compare anything like with like! You refer to the case of one Gayle Bishop. The two cases are completely different! Ms. Bishop lied to a Grand Jury. She had attempted to cover up her felony under oath. She perjured herself. I understand in the USA that is a crime punishible by up to five years in prison. Ms. Bishop was also found guilty of using her staff to run her law practice as well as her campaign for re-election. The judge was also concerned that Ms. Bishop showed no remorse and refused to take responsibility for her actions. The Rayner case is totaly different and invoves a second house which had in fact been sold to a trust to benefit Ms. Raynor's special needs child. Ms. Raynor had taken legal advice. She never lied and always admitted her underpayment. And you are wrong. You stated Ms. Bishop went to prison for "between 2 - 3 years"! She spent all of 19 days in jail. There is absolutely zero reason for Angela Rayner to spend any time in jail. She owned up to an error and has paid a hefy price for it. Senior US politicians rarely do that unless actually caught comitting one of several crimes. Even then, many remain in office. The Nixon Presidency was a den of thieves going right up to the Vice President Spiro Agnew. In President Reagan's administration the Attorney General Elliot Abrams, Michael Deaver, Melvyn Paisley, Victor Cohen, James Gaines and others were all convicted and found guilty of crimes for which several spent well over one year in jail. Under George Bush 1, among the guilty were the Treasurer of the USA who pleaded guilty to obstruction of justice and tax evasion. Under every President since there have been allegations against Congressmen and Senators who remained in their posts before prosecutions and jail time for various crimes. Need one mention George Santos?

That's a 9 year old article. It in absoutely no way compares with an ad issued in mid-2025! Go back in many countries' histories and you will find endless stupid and senseless ads.