PeterRS

I cannot find the fascination some people have for this "sport" - if that it can be called. It ranks for me alongside the American Rodeo horse bareback jumping, as inane a "sport" as I can imagine. But then I suppose Spanish and Americans find croquet and cricket both boring and baffling/

As the Japan tourism industry continues to suffer from the ill-advised remarks by the right-wing Prime Minister on the Taiwan issue, an issue avoided publicly by all previous heads of government, the country's right wing militarists are delighted at the possibility that the Constitution might be changed. Written, it must be remembered, by the Americans and now part of Trump's ever-changing international interference as he wants this Constitution changed, Clause 9 states - “Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes” But many Japanese are totally against such change, especially the nation's young people. Public spaces across Japan are being filled with demonstrations by peope born more than half a century after the end of the war in the Pacific. 22-year old student Gohta Hashimoto is now participating in the anti-change demonstrations which have been getting bigger and bigger. "Until now, I had never thought of the Constitution as something young people needed to fight for," he said. Another student, Yuki Hioki, said at a rally in Tokyo - “The Constitution enables us to stay out of America’s wars, including in this region . . . The thought that might change makes me really angry” With the country's economy suffering from the large drop in Chinese tourism and the ¥ sinking even further, the Prime Minister seemingly knows that she still has Japan's ageing militarists on her side. But if she now loses the confidence of the nation's young people, she will be in for a fight. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/22/japan-youth-pacifist-constitution-trump-iran

For anyone interested, TrueVisions in Thailand is showing a sub-titled version of Close at 8:00 pm on Tuesday 28 April Channel 223.

Those who claim there is no such thing as cultural differences are regrettably wrong. Having lived in Asia for 46 years and had relationships, some longish but some relatively short, with Japanese, Chinese, Thai, Taiwanese and Singaporean guys during that time, I can tell you that even with a Singaporean who was fluent in English there were cultural problems. Partly my fault, I admit. But they certainly do exist. I suspect @floridarob must be referring to guys who work in the commerical sex business. I know of several older farang who have enjoyed long and meaningful monogamous relationships in Japan, Hong Kong and Thailand with much younger men who had never worked in the sex trade in any capacity - and who do not go out of the relationship to have sex. Not many, perhaps, but they certainly exist. On the other hand, I do agree with the sentiment that long distance relationships are not viable - or at least most are not. Certainly I fell into this category too often. Perhaps the most sensible advice in this forum. Not sure about Grindr but if you take a sampling of the apps in general, there are plenty of non-money boys. In my 3-4 annual visits to Taipei I have met many guys from apps and not one has ever asked for money. Same in Tokyo.

You will surely know of the hundreds of books written about JFK and in particular the assassination. @Keithambrose post was somewhat unnecessary. Lee Harvey Oswald it is generally (although not by everyone) assumed to have killed JFK and therefore Jackie Kennedy no longer had to put up with his infidelities. JFK had allegedly told the British Prime Minister Harold McMillan "If I don't have a woman for three days, I get terrible headaches." That must have been a challenge for McMillan who knew his wife was having a long-time affair with Lord Boothby! But Onassis only married Jackie - he for her position in society and she to guard her children whom she feared would also be on an assassin's list. One author Peter Evens did link Onassis to the assassination of Robert Kennedy (not JFK) in his book Nemesis (allegedly the "true" story of Onassis life) - but it is tenuous at best and has never been proved beyond being a doubtful conspiracy theory. And everyone knew that the Jackie/Onassis marriage was a sham with the relationship lasting little more than a couple of months.

The air quality in Chiang Mai has always suffered in the run up to Songkran due to farmers setting fire to the stubble left by their crops to clear the land. It's nothing new and it has always had some affect on the tourism business. Now it seems to be getting worse. When tourists look at the countryside from Doi Suthep, in most parts of the year they have a glorious view of the surrounding countryside. Recently all they have seen is haze and tourist numbers are falling. Photo: Rebecca Ratcliffe/The Guardian The business of burning fields has been illegal for quite a number of years, but no-one does anything to stop it. It is, say experts, an issue of funding - or the lack of it. Lighting a match is quick and easy and does the job fast. It would need expensive equipment to achieve the same result without causing haze. The situation has got worse with high temperatures also leading to the outbreak of wildfires like this recent one. Photo: The Guardian The dust created by the haze affects everyone. An article in today's Guardian also points out that the popssibility of cancer from the haze has recently shaken the Province. Krittai Tanasombatkul, a 29-year-old doctor and clean-air campaigner, died in 2023. He had never smoked and lived a healthy lifestyle, exercising, sleeping and eating well, media reported at the time. His death was attributed to the particles in the haze. Young children have been suffering from frequent nose bleeds, a common symptom for those living with air pollution. Some families send their children away to avoid the haze. Atikun Limsukon, a doctor specialising in chest and lung care, who runs a private clinic, says his patient caseload has more than doubled over recent weeks . . . Limsukon says there is more and more evidence linking pollution not only to cancer, but also strokes, metabolic problems like diabetes and even neurocognitive problems and dementia. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/15/thailand-chiang-mai-tourism-air-pollution-war-price-spikes

Also my view. Domestic US politics will end Trump's idiotic war, not his war machine.

In what sense?

Multi-national talks with Iran had been going on for years until Trump killed them in his first term. Now he reckoned a deal could be done with a country which loathes him in just 24 hours. What planet does he think he now commands? With J D Vance having failed miserably in both the objectives set for his recent trip - the reelection of the vile Orban in Hungary and getting a deal with Iran - I hope he realises that he is unikely to last long in Trump's orbit.

Thai banks - and I believe WU - will require a formal valid ID.

But as with Trump and some others, the real problem for any electorate is it does not know that when you first give them power! I see that following has spat with the Pope, Trump posted an illustration on his media platform of him as Jesus. After a torrent of anger from his Christian supporters it was taken down. But it is all over the media now. Interesting that a warplane features in the image!

Ah but the crows have finally disappeared. The anti-crow devices you get cheaply from several stores are remarkably effective. So he'd have to bring his own alarm clock 🤪 Seeing how hotel prices are going up, I now have to charge for the balcony, although as a member he'd get a very substantial discount on $908 per night LOL

A fascinating article with a new hotel for @Olddaddy - the US$908 per night Siri Sala Private Thai Villa! 🤪 Curious, though, that there is no mention of Bangkok still sinking. Already the city sits an average of only 0.5-1.5 meters above sea level. Largely due to the soil on which the city is built and the idiocy of the post WWII period when many of the khlongs were filled in with concrete to create wide roads, Bangkok is now sinking at the rate of 1cm - 2cm per year. Much less than during the 1970s but added to the effects of sea rise as a result of global warming, some experts suggest parts of the city will be under water within 30 years. As Professor Seree Supratid, the director of climate change and disaster centre at Rangsit Centre, stated in an aticle almost two years ago - "We cannot avoid such catastrophic flooding. This is not fortune telling, this is science." He added it was difficult to find politicians willing to fund construction projects that could take up to 20 years to complete. Normally they are not interested because they say, "I am elected for four years, I will not think for more than four years," so this is a big problem for us. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-11/bangkok-is-sinking-residents-warn-rising-seas-will-swallow-city/102559364 This Buddhust Temple in Khun Samut Chin Village is surrounded by water and only stands firm because the temple's monks arranged to have walls built around it more than 20 years ago.

I doubt the cost of living has much to do with it. The much weaker ¥ accounts for the present difference in prices. Japan used to be considerably more expensive than Hong Kong.

A very good and pertinent point in this discussion. To add to it: the war in Laos was a covert CIA operation that never had congressional approval. It was a secret war. Almost unbelievably, for an average of 9 entire years the USA dropped one planeload of bombs over Laos every 8 minutes. Think about that for a moment and take it in. This tiny landlocked third world country had more bombs dropped on it than the entire number dropped on Germany AND Japan combined during WWII. And the USA still refuses to pay for the destruction of the roughly one third of these cluster bombs that failed to explode, ordinance that has already killed 20,000 Lao people since the end of the undeclared war - mostly children as @zoomomancs points out. At the present rate it will take 100 more years to clear the country of this horrendous debacle. https://www.bbc.com/audio/play/p0fjwcjy https://www.bbc.com/audio/play/p0fjwcjy

Yet at the time he was awarded the top job both legally and constitutionally. I have written above how Iran has had no free and fair elections since the ouster of Mosaddegh in 1953 by the Americans and British. Since you have brought up Hitler, it is perhaps wise to recall that without the punishing reparations that totally crippled Germany at the Versailles Treaty, the groundswell which enabled AH to rise to power in the 1920s might well have shifted against him. Speculation, I agree. But when peoples had to take cash in wheelbarrows to pay for a loaf of bread, any lifeline out of such degradation can seem almost a miracle. And that holds good for Iran. We are told that having got rid of many of the leaders of the old regime, the Israelis and their allies the USA have ended up with an even more hard line lot. True or not, I do not know, but I believe that the more the USA tries to punish Iran, the more the people will hate that country. When will the USA realise that influencing the rest of the world with wars and interfering in other coutries' politics is just not in their best interests? Since 1945 the USA has lost almost every war it entered in a developing country. As former US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates states frankly in his 2014 memoir Duty: "the US is good at overthrowing governments but has no idea what to do when it comes to their replacements". Sending J D Vance into Hungary to support the despised Victor Orban was probably the final nail in his coffin as his oppponent won an astonishing two thirds majority. Trump and his merry band of yes-men cohorts should first sort out the sometimes horrible problems in their own country before interfering with others.

And Trump and his acolytes have zero idea of the lessons of history. Had he just looked at the quagmire of Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam, he would have kept well away from Iran. One look at the several major disasters from Bush 2's war with Iraq would have been another lesson. One reading of Robert McNamara's long mea culpa In Retrospect would have brought home precisely how the disasters and deaths happening in Vietnam were a direct result of the misguided and wrong policies which he and his Washington colleagues were actually advocating. He would have realised that the American Consul in East Pakistan was almost daily begging Washington to take action with West Pakistan to stop its monstrous bloodshed which they described as "selective genocide." Washington did nothing. No one knows how many actually died but historians estimate it could have been as high as 3 million.

You think the Iranian people are fighting for free and fair elections? What planet are you on? Hardly any now know what that means! Ever since the Brits and the CIA mounted the coup that got rid of their last freely elected Prime Minister Mosaddegh in 1953, there have never been free and fair elections. Iranians have only known dictatorships, increasingly repressive, megalomaniacal and murderous ones. Iranians do not forget that it was the USA's weapons and cash that enabled the hated Shah to hold on to power and to continue through his Sawak Secret police his murderous regime. Without all that American aid, the Shah could never have survived - and the result of that would almost certainly have been no Khomeini. Nor do Iranians forget that when Saddam Hussein started the 8-year Iraq/Iran War, it was with Saddam that the USA sided. And what happened to Saddam? The Iranians know well that the USA turned 180º against him. Further, as we now know from CIA documents declassifed in 2013, the USA never once pushed Saddam to stop using chemical weapons against the Iranians. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2013/08/26/215733981/new-details-on-how-u-s-helped-saddam-as-he-gassed-iran Which country called Iran part of the "Axis of Evil"? Which country has not only frozen vast sums of cash owed to the Iranians, it has persuaded others to do so as well leading to the Iranians being owed around $100 billion of its own cash? Which has led the movement to place sanction after sanction on the country? You clearly forget these were all actions of or started by the USA and pressed on its allies. And if you think Iranians in general might even consider placing any trust in the USA which with its ally Israel has also bombed the hell out of them in recent weeks - starting, let's recall with a US missile which murdered 170+ girls aged 7-12 in their school - you have with respect very little idea about Iranian thinking. FYI this mural still remains on the wall of the old US Embassy building in Teheran! PS: I doubt if the Iranians hold much faith in free and fair elections. They wiill have noted that such a process elected Trump and Netanyahu!

The US could not occupy Iran. Let's get that very clear. It did indeed occupy Iraq with near disastrous consequences for it had no clue what it was really doing - one result being the rise of ISIS. But Iran is four times larger than Iraq - four times! Further, the deserts in Iran are nothing like the deserts in Iraq. They are not sand. They are basically a wide mix of some of the highest stony sand dunes on the planet, barren salty desert and high rugged mountains. Desert areas cover more than 50% of the country. Only around 10% of the country is what we might call lowland. Then there is the heat! Some of the hottest temperatures ever recorded on our planet were 82.2ºC (180ºF) near Iran's Qeshm Dayrestan Airport in August last year. For a long time the Lut Desert had the highest temperature ever recorded on earth at 70.7ºC. That was exceeded last year when the Lut Desert recorded 80ºC. Humans die at such temperatures if exposed for much more than ten minutes without massive hydration. How long would troops carrying a lot of equipment last? Remember, too, that Iran has a severe shortage of water. While we're at it, let's also recall that if the present negotiations in Pakistan fail and Trump is idiotic enough to try and invade, he will be doing so at the hottest time of the year. I would certainly fear for the lives of US forces in such conditions, the more so as you have to cross deserts to get to many population centres. On my two-week trip to Iran in 2017, I had to spend two days crossing deserts and each time I prayed the car I was in would not break down! Then there is the population. Before the war, Iraq had a population of between 24 and 25 million with 432,000 in its armed forces. Iran's population is generally agreed to be around 92 million and we know that it has much larger armed forces than Iraq in the Revolutionary Guard. We also know that Iranians are a proud and passionate people, jealous of their 2,500 year old Empire. Iraq only became a state in 1921. America's forces are already almost overstretched. A ground war would require massive conscription. After the disaster of Vietnam, the US public will never stand for that again unless the US homeland is being invaded. https://www.worldweatherattribution.org/human-induced-climate-change-compounded-by-socio-economic-water-stressors-increased-severity-of-5-year-drought-in-iran-and-euphrates-and-tigris-basin/

There is no way the US can occupy Iran.

I think the reason Japan now seems more affordable is simply because it is!! The ¥ has fallen by more than half its value against the US$ and the spa owners don't seem to have been quick of the mark at adjusting prices. On the other hand, why should they adjust prices given that the vast majority of their clients are Japanese guys? With the usual large number of Chinese tourists virtually banned from visiting Japan by their government, now is almost as cheap as the Japan has been for tourists for decades.

Thanks for taking us behind the paywall. As far as the above comment is concerned, today it does indeed seem farcical. But looking 2 or 3 years into the future, is it any more farcical that Germany would become an ally of the UK and the USA, or that Vietnam become an ally of the USA? Israel is never going to get rid of Iran and Iran is never going together rid of israel. I can certainly see a situation where the Middle East is torn apart and then carved up between them. Surely that would be preferential to a bunch of individual states which were carved out of the desert and created from scratch by Brtain and other colonial powers?

Do we know for sure that Netanyahu persuaded Trump? To me that is spin and I have no idea if it is true or false. I believe Netanyahu is very much at the bottom of the quagmire the US is now in, but I doubt if Trump would have started a war unless he knew Netanyahu was going to back him up with a vast arsenal of weaponry. I know little about AI. But if his vdos are AI speak, they sure make a great deal of sense.

I have paid little attention to the pundits on TV and elsewhere about the Middle East War, partly because I do not trust a word of what politicians and so-called decision makers in any country are saying. However, as I sometimes do, I pick up nuggets from youtube. Some admittedly is crap - and I have recently been guilty of repeating one crap entry, for which I again apologise. This morning, though, I listened to a video explanation by Canadian educator Jiang Xueqin (who is not actually a professor) of how he believes the war has to end. Hong Kong's South China Morning Post has dubbed him China's Nostradamus. I have never listened to any of his vdos before - and i admit I am slightly baffled by the comment on the top left "Altered or synthetic comment" as I do not know what it means! But I find much of what he says to be logical and worth hearing. Part of the reason for going to war was new to me - especially the petrodollar issue. And part of what he predicts could be one of the outcomes with shifting alliances in a Middle East without an American presence is at the least very interesting. I believe he is correct in sugeting that Iran will never trust America, if only because every time they have been in the midst of previous negotiations, the USA has torn them up. He believes that the USA has to withdraw from the Middle East partly because it will be overextended militarily, and that the resultant vacuum will be filled by Israel and Iran. The remaining Middle East states willl then align with one or the other - for their own interests. He believes that eventually Israel and Iran will eventually agree to co-exist - and that I do find more than somewhat difficult to believe. But then I really have no idea what to believe. I just find this analysis interesting. His entry on wikipedia states this - Jiang's Geo-Strategy episode, "The Iran Trap" (2024), has attracted international attention, predicting the re-election of Donald Trump in 2024 and escalating U.S. involvement in a conflict with Iran (cf. the 2025 and 2026 conflicts) and eventual U.S. loss in a prolonged conflict, the first two of which have come true as of 2026. According to India Today, other analysts had made similar predictions but "Jiang packaged them early and memorably."

I live in a totally different continent - in Asia - and there seems to be a few differences in attitude when it comes to protection from HIV with more using PREP and or condoms for casual sex. In my view, the type of sex you want is only partly your decision. Sex takes two people and if both wish it raw and both are aware of the dangers, so be it. But if one is not, then raw sex without either PREP or a condom becomes a different matter altogether. Sadly here in Bangkok there is a rise in HIV cases among young men in the 18-25 or so age group who attend saunas scattered mostly on the outskirts of the city. Around 7 in 10 of new cases are among young guys who seem to believe that unprotected sex is now safe. But 96.4% of new infections are linked to unprotected sex. I tend to agree with @KeepItReal. Actions have consequences and unfortunately for you your own have resulted in your being HIV positive. But what about all the seemingly many men you have sex with? Did you give thought to them, I wonder? And I am curious how will you modify your sexual behaviour taking account of your present HIV status?