When Churchill uttered his famous phrase about democracy, he is usually misquoted as the first and final parts of that quote are usually left out. What he actually said was -
No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.
There seems little argument that democracy in 2026 is well and truly fucked and definitely not working. We have an elected criminal from a tiny country in the Midde East (elected?) sucking up at every turn to the elected criminal of the world's largest military (elected?) with the result that illegally this known idiot from the second country joins in a war against a third without consulting the rest of the world. And several of the key countries spread around that third which has a culture and history dating back millennia have mostly borders determined solely during the British colonial era by a British woman, Gertrude Bell, and which were acually created little more than a century ago.
Putting militant theocracy to one side, does not Iran/Persia deserve its place in that part of the world? And had it not been for the USA backing the Shah to the hilt and beyond despite being fully aware of his megalomania and his reign of terror, the militant theocratic state which emerged after the Iranians took maters into their own hands and themselves threw out the Shah might have earlier emerged as a form of democracy with which its neighbours - all of them - might otherwise not have been displeased? The democratic system in the USA which often sees one rigid set of views replaced by a very different set of rigid views is, frankly, nuts in this day and age. Naturally it was not always so, but times change and if people and systems do not change with them, chaos frequently results.
The Middle East cannot be compared to Asia many of whose own countries were also founded milennia ago. Importantly, Asia's 20th century wars have largely been dictated by the external circumstances of nucear reality and the Cold War.
But back to the subject. If democracy is nearing disaster, with what do we replace it? We talk ad nauseam about democracy requring democratic institutions, free and fair elections, a free press, a legal system beyond reproach and so on and so on. If these are indeed the requirements, democracy already has one foot in the grave in most of the world.
It is surely the nuclear issue which now makes an answer to that question almost impossible. History has always been shaped by wars and the weapons of war that have been devised over time to give one side an edge until the next lethal instrument is devised. When an instrumewnt now exists that technically could wipe out humanity, what comes next? Nothing! We are fucked!