Guest Pearl69er Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 As Gaybutton has seen fit to delete many of my posts whilst claiming that is his right-he does not have the moral right to allow attacks upon a poster to stand without that poster being able to respond.( moderators of publicly accessible internet boards need to check recent court decisions if they think otherwise and I will be happy to forward them the information) Therefore those who repsonded to the "The 500 baht virgin " thread should re-read the thread and apologise for their accusations ( I don't expect this to happen so will let it stand as it is !). 1. I responded with my ideas about the subject and within that reply questioned Hedda's ideas. 2. Hedda respnded with a personal attack upon my writing style without commenting on the subject. 3. He also claimed I was writing under other names and continued this accusation which was intimated by others : this is completely false. 4. Other posters leapt to Hedda's defence-their right-but continued along the line that I was attacking Hedda. 5. They accuse me of having a "pesonal vendetta". This is not true -although I know who he is and his methods of attack which is : ATTACK THE MAN AND NOT HIS MESSAGE. 6. Another poster in his rush to defend Hedda reduces my comments to an attack about spelling on a seperate thread. Lets be clear : I have no problem it anyone attacks my writing (or any other) style , spelling or subject matter. I DO however reserve the right to respond without censorship. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TotallyOz Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 Lets be clear : I have no problem it anyone attacks my writing (or any other) style , spelling or subject matter. I DO however reserve the right to respond without censorship. Thank you. And, you have done so now. Let me add that Pearl does not post under this board with any other name. Perhaps, he does post under other boards but that is his prerogative. On this board, the moniker Pearl69er is only Pear69er. I do wonder if the 69 in the name is more revealing than anything else. I do love good foreplay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaybutton Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 As Gaybutton has seen fit to delete many of my posts whilst claiming that is his right-he does not have the moral right to allow attacks upon a poster to stand without that poster being able to respond. That, sir, is a flat out lie. "Many" of your posts? I eliminated a grand total of two of your posts and sent you a PM telling you the reason for the deletions was your use of profanity. That is not acceptable on this message board. I also told you that you can repost your responses as long as you do not use profanity. If any posts other than the ones I communicated with you about were eliminated, I'm not the one who did it. This board has one owner and three moderators, all of whom have the ability to eliminate posts. I have tried my best to be fair with you, but since you wish to be public about this I'll tell you now that you are being treated the same as everyone else who posts on this board and the rules here apply to everyone. Nobody is telling you that you cannot respond if you feel that you are being attacked, but you are being told that if you use profanity, then you can kiss goodbye posts that contain it. That also applies to everyone who posts on this board. If that's not good enough for you, then I suggest finding another message board on which to post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hedda Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 Let me add that Pearl does not post under this board with any other name Nor do I, sir, contrary to what Pearly69 suggested in an earlier post. May I suggest however, that unless you are Pearly herself, which I doubt, there's no way you can tell how many other names out of the 4500 you have registered here, may also belong to Pearly 69er. The fact that you can't match pearly69's IP in her recent flurry of 20 posts to any other poster's established IP, does not mean that Pearly isn't also writing under a variety of other names, by using another computer, IP anonymizer or other masking device. By her own statements, Pearly69 admits to being a posting veteran.In my experience, that kind of obsessive junky with an obvious chip on her shoulder doesn't suddenly appear as a new poster on an established board in the middle of an ongoing thread. Frankly, I was a bit surprised by your statement that Pearly69 does not use other posting names here, because there's simply no way you can know or ever verify that negative fact. More importantly, I don't think any owner or moderator should ever make that kind of representation that can't be verified, because it opens the door to all sorts of mischief. It puts your and your board in a position where you have vouched for something or someone that you cannot possibly know as proven fact. For example, having now vouched that Pearly69 is not using other posting names here, can you say the same thing about the poster(s) who alternatively appear as Earwig or LMTU ? Does the fact that you have made no reference to my earlier statements that I post here solely as Hedda, mean that you doubt the accuracy of my representation ? It's a can of worms that anonymous posting boards cannot open without compromising their anonymity or impartiality. It can also open a slippery slide into serious problems of board credibility, if and when the board look like it's playing sides in a heated debate. I don't believe for one moment that Pearly69 sprang like Venus on the half shell for the first time here, just 16 days ago. The name may be new but the lady obviously has a posting history she doesn't care to share. Do you know any better ? . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pearl69er Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 That, sir, is a flat out lie. "Many" of your posts? I eliminated a grand total of two of your posts and sent you a PM telling you the reason for the deletions was your use of profanity. That is not acceptable on this message board. I also told you that you can repost your responses as long as you do not use profanity. If any posts other than the ones I communicated with you about were eliminated, I'm not the one who did it. This board has one owner and three moderators, all of whom have the ability to eliminate posts. I have tried my best to be fair with you, but since you wish to be public about this I'll tell you now that you are being treated the same as everyone else who posts on this board and the rules here apply to everyone. Nobody is telling you that you cannot respond if you feel that you are being attacked, but you are being told that if you use profanity, then you can kiss goodbye posts that contain it. That also applies to everyone who posts on this board. If that's not good enough for you, then I suggest finding another message board on which to post. An over-reaction on your part Gaybutton but I apologise ( how could I not) as I confused you with GayThailand. And I got the point that what you call profanity is not allowed. However I think that to delete an entire post because of a couple of "profane" words goes too far. But if that is your mode of operating I can hardly change it. And I am pleased that I am being treated just as any other. Thanks for the invite to leave-but I think I'll stay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TotallyOz Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 May I suggest however, that unless you are Pearly hersel I have sang about the Pearly gates on many occassions. I also have a drag name that is not related to pearl but I wear them in my act. But, I don't post at a pearl. I have been told I had pearls of wisdom at times. Does the fact that you have made no reference to my earlier statements that I post here solely as Hedda, mean that you doubt the accuracy of my representation ? Not in the least. I have always thought you only posted as Hedda. You are I are similar in that we both can hold our own and don't need conversations with ourselves. I do talk to myself on occassion but I have yet to answer myself. The fact that you can't match pearly69's IP in her recent flurry of 20 posts to any other poster's established IP, does not mean that Pearly isn't also writing under a variety of other names, by using another computer, IP anonymizer or other masking device. You are right. I say the same about you. I should have said, "My women's intuition tells me Pearl68 only posts as that." Thanks for the invite to leave-but I think I'll stay. How about Tea and Bisquits? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pearl69er Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 By her own statements, Pearly69 admits to being a posting veteran.In my experience, that kind of obsessive junky with an obvious chip on her shoulder doesn't suddenly appear as a new poster on an established board in the middle of an ongoing thread. . Oh Hedda you really should give it a rest. I did not say you posted under other names-you need to re-read what I said. I may be a posting veteran but not on this board and so what if I am new to here-what is this some exclusive club were new members must past muster before they can post ? Perhaps there is an initiation process I need to go through ? " obsessive junky with an obvious chip on her shoulder "- rather strong words don't you think ?. I think the real truth here is that I have rattled your cage and you don't like it. For the record : I AM NOT EARWIG- I AM NOT LMTU. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hedda Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 "My women's intuition tells me Pearl68 only posts as that." It's Pearly69er, dear. So much for your intuition. You seem to have ignored commenting on whether that other dynamic set of posting twins share more than Chang and Eng did. You're learning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pearl69er Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 It's Pearly69er, dear. So much for your intuition. You seem to have ignored commenting on whether that other dynamic set of posting twins share more than Chang and Eng did. You're learning. Wrong again Hedda-how could I possibly know if they are one and the same ? (And for that matter -who gives a stuff ?) but keep 'em coming-this is fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wowpow Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 pro?fane? [pruh-feyn, proh-] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation adjective, verb, -faned, -fan?ing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaybutton Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 Thanks for the dictionary definition, Wowpow. Until now I didn't realize that I'm a profane heathen. You know something? I'm glad I am! As for you, Pearl69er, an overreaction on my part? Ok. In the future if you try really hard not to confuse the names of people at whom you wish to hurl accusations, maybe nobody will overreact. This is the second time I've been the subject, on this board, of posts making accusations against me when they were meant for GayThailand. I'm Gaybutton. He's GayThailand. It can't be all that difficult to distinguish between the two. Before those of you out there who are breathing fire and so extremely angry that you just can't wait to post, at least take a second or two to make sure you are directing your hatred toward the correct person. Don't worry. I've been the subject of accusations many, many times over the years and often still am. The problem the accusers have is that I don't really care what they think, although I know from time to time I am fully deserving of the hate posts. Now, Pearl69er, if anyone is overreacting I'd say it's you. You're going on and on and on with this the same way another poster went on and on and on about Niddy's Nook. As long as you keep responding people are going to continue their posts. You've already said, time after time, that you are not guilty of the accusations being made against you. You've made your point and everyone reading these threads is already well aware of your position. Unless having the absolute last word is an imperative for you, I suggest that it's been quite enough. Continuing these responses is making you appear as something I doubt you wish to be perceived as. It's a two-word phrase. The first word is horse's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Snowkat Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 You've already said, time after time, that you are not guilty of the accusations being made against you. You've made your point and everyone reading these threads is already well aware of your position. Unless having the absolute last word is an imperative for you, I suggest that it's been quite enough. Hopefully I can get my two cents worth in before Pear69er comes back on that !!! . Well said GB - enough is enough. Move on to something more constructive which interests all of the board instead of bitching all the time. It may be fun to Pearl69er but it is absolutely inane and boring to the rest of us ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pearl69er Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 Thanks for the dictionary definition, Wowpow. Until now I didn't realize that I'm a profane heathen. You know something? I'm glad I am! As for you, Pearl69er, an overreaction on my part? Ok. In the future if you try really hard not to confuse the names of people at whom you wish to hurl accusations, maybe nobody will overreact. This is the second time I've been the subject, on this board, of posts making accusations against me when they were meant for GayThailand. I'm Gaybutton. He's GayThailand. It can't be all that difficult to distinguish between the two. Before those of you out there who are breathing fire and so extremely angry that you just can't wait to post, at least take a second or two to make sure you are directing your hatred toward the correct person. Don't worry. I've been the subject of accusations many, many times over the years and often still am. The problem the accusers have is that I don't really care what they think, although I know from time to time I am fully deserving of the hate posts. Now, Pearl69er, if anyone is overreacting I'd say it's you. You're going on and on and on with this the same way another poster went on and on and on about Niddy's Nook. As long as you keep responding people are going to continue their posts. You've already said, time after time, that you are not guilty of the accusations being made against you. You've made your point and everyone reading these threads is already well aware of your position. Unless having the absolute last word is an imperative for you, I suggest that it's been quite enough. Continuing these responses is making you appear as something I doubt you wish to be perceived as. It's a two-word phrase. The first word is horse's. I don't know why you are so hot and bothered Gaybutton but you obviously are to post such a lengthy reply and I say again-you are over-reacting to a simple mistake made by me-confusing 2 names. Hardly a hangable offence. Nor did I "hurl" an accusation at you , I said that you had deleted my posts ( but admittedly got the number wrong-is that such a big deal ?) I will point out once again for you, others and Snowkat : before you make such exagerated claims about me-please go back and read the chain of posts and you will see that I have merely answered each poster as they have had a go at me !!! If you are suggesting that I should not respond say to Snowkat's "it is absolutely inane and boring to the rest of us !" ( but not too boring that he couldn't avoid having a snipe)-then the answer is NO, I shall always respnd when someone impies something about me . No-one is forcing anyone to read anything I post they can simply ignore me if they wish. But getting in little snips and snipes like the example I just displayed and implying things like "horses arse" and then acting all high and mighty as though the person is above it all-is really quite laughable if not childish. Tell me the rules then : are only special people allowed the last word and if I continue to defend myself is that an invitation for more insults (like yours) ?. Again let's be clear : I don't give a damn what anyone thinks about me or says about me on here -I shall always respnd. Call me a horse's arse or anything else if it makes you feel good. Doesn't bother me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Snowkat Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 I don't give a damn what anyone thinks about me or says about me on here..... Doesn't bother me. It must bother you greatly if you feel you have to defend yourself anytime someone writes something about you which you don't like . It's all "I" - and "me", "me", "me". You are obviously overwhelmed with your own huge ego and your inflated view of how important you are. Give it a rest and stop polluting this board with your inane ramblings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pearl69er Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 It must bother you greatly if you feel you have to defend yourself anytime someone writes something about you which you don't like . It's all "I" - and "me", "me", "me". You are obviously overwhelmed with your own huge ego and your inflated view of how important you are. Give it a rest and stop polluting this board with your inane ramblings. Is that the last word from you ?. A bit touchy aren't you ?. why stop now-plenty of people are reading the thread. Sorry to disapoint you but -yes, I am quite important to myself and I'd be surprised if you weren't to you. Nor am I "overwhelmed by my own huge ego" but I do have one. Seems like you do as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest queenann Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 Is that the last word from you ?. A bit touchy aren't you ?. why stop now-plenty of people are reading the thread. Sorry to disapoint you but -yes, I am quite important to myself and I'd be surprised if you weren't to you. Nor am I "overwhelmed by my own huge ego" but I do have one. Seems like you do as well. Perhaps professional help may be needed for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pearl69er Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 Perhaps professional help may be needed for you. What sort of professional help would you consider I need ?. I think I'm quite capable of answering the slings and arrows myself . But as you have joined those sledging-by alll means , make a suggestion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Khunatm Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 I only became aware of this thread recently and I will only make one comment. A famous and very successful Australian Rules football coach named Ron Barassi once said, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Snowkat Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 For what is it is worth, I feel it is now time we all moved on. That's what we have been trying to tell Pearl69er for the last week but her stubborn ego is getting in the way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pearl69er Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 That's what we have been trying to tell Pearl69er for the last week but her stubborn ego is getting in the way. Very noble of you Snowkat but your ability to tell one to "move on" whilst plunging a verbal knife in at the same time isn't the most diplomatic aproach. However I think I make an important point and it isn't about myself as others may think as I can look after my own affairs. The title of the thread says it all- and the replies demonstrated that many can dish out but take great umbrage when the spotlight is turned upon them. I've found it fairly illuminating. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...