Cackling Kamala's FOX Debate Disaster

[EmmetK]

Cackling Kamala came late and ended it early. She answered not ONE question with any related response. All of it was an embarrassment for her — her people just waved him off and got her out of there. 
She arrived 17 minutes late to the interview and her handlers cut the interview by 5 minutes. Cagey thing...isn't she? Baier did a great job...he should teach the lamestream media, including Howard Stern and and the hens from the View, how to interview since they were unable to do what Baier did.
The Cackle Queen has no problems when the "moderators" who are pretending to be journalists are spoon feeding her. But when she has to do an interview without any help, she is a dumpster fire.

HILARIOUS !!! If Baier had asked her who her opponent was 800 times, well, she could answer that one! She used Trump’s name repeatedly for questions that had NOTHING to do with him.

She came off very smarmy, totally unprepared and unqualified. All she did was filibuster and blame Trump for everything except Hurricane Helene.

 

Cackling Kamala was put on Dementia Joe's ticket for one reason and one reason only. And it wasn't because she was the most qualified.
She was a DEI hire who was put on the ticket only because she was a tan female. Period.
Not a viable candidate. This was made perfectly clear last night.

It's all the Dem Cartel could come up with on short notice, a vapid, giggling twit  - after canning Dementia Joe.

 

Her Only voters are deranged anti DJT morons.
Emotional freaks really.

[stevenkesslar]

1 hour ago, EmmetK said:

She was a DEI hire

 

And she's going for a Black job.  Ugh!  And she is ahead in the polls.  

Have I ever mentioned how charming you are?  And how intelligent?

So glad you are back, just in time to lose.  🤪

(Disclaimer, Donald J. Trump, a felon, lost the 2020 election.)

[Suckrates]

Oh EmmetK, you poor brainwashed demented fool......Fox's only mission was to humiliate Kamala, and Brett came in hot and hostile from the start, BUT Cackles shut that shit down, called out Baer for sabotaging her and showing clips altered to favor Trump instead of the actual clips that PROVED her points...  Fox apparently hasnt learned from their 787 million dollar lawsuit.   And Cackles showed the viewing audience the truth about Trump, Fox, and the misleading information Fox purposely pushes to get Trump re-elected.   And EmmettK, sadly YOU keep proving how damaged and delusional you are if you believe Fox and Baer prevailed in a take down of Cackles.....But actually, Fox was "outted" once again, and Cackles RULED that debacle. 

 

And by the way, did you attend Trumps musical lovesfest in Pennsylvania the other day ?  I looked for you on the screen but didnt see ya there.   But wasnt Trumps playlist awesome ?   And isnt he a great dancer ?  🤣🤣

[EmmetK]

Cackling Kamala has had almost four years to do something about the border as Border Czar, and has done NOTHING!!! She even refused to apologize to the families of the young women brutally murdered by the illegals that the Biden/Harris policy allowed to walk across the border unchecked, who would have NEVER been allowed into this country under President Trump. When questioned, she just says a few IDIOTIC words to try to change the subject, then constantly repeats, "let me finish" and the interviewer gets impatient waiting for her to finish repeating herself trying to get out her pre-rehearsed talking points. Then she finishes by blaming Trump for her FAILURE!!! She should be forced to watch her own train wreck of an interview, so she can see just how big of a FOOL she really is!!! Doug Emhoff & Tampon Tim must be embarrassed watching her interview. .

Cackles needs to be cut off and talked over every time she goes off the rails. Who ever gave her the idea that when a woman talks she need to be able to finish her conversation without interruption? Her first interview where the moderator(s) didn't fawn all over her, and she failed miserably.
Cackling Kamala is just like my Aunt Tillie. She gets louder and louder, talking over you regardless if she is right or wrong. But during the interview she wasn't right a single time, and we learned only that she is a monster - ugly attitude, nasty and arrogant. Just like Aunt Tillie.

TRUMP 2024
MAGA

[KeepItReal]

Oh look who is back! And just in time for Halloween! Well, sugar, I hope you stash away some treats for when you need to force down the medicine in November. 

[Suckrates]

20 minutes ago, EmmetK said:

Cackling Kamala has had almost four years to do something about the border as Border Czar, and has done NOTHING!!! She even refused to apologize to the families of the young women brutally murdered by the illegals that the Biden/Harris policy allowed to walk across the border unchecked, who would have NEVER been allowed into this country under President Trump. When questioned, she just says a few IDIOTIC words to try to change the subject, then constantly repeats, "let me finish" and the interviewer gets impatient waiting for her to finish repeating herself trying to get out her pre-rehearsed talking points. Then she finishes by blaming Trump for her FAILURE!!! She should be forced to watch her own train wreck of an interview, so she can see just how big of a FOOL she really is!!! Doug Emhoff & Tampon Tim must be embarrassed watching her interview. .

Cackles needs to be cut off and talked over every time she goes off the rails. Who ever gave her the idea that when a woman talks she need to be able to finish her conversation without interruption? Her first interview where the moderator(s) didn't fawn all over her, and she failed miserably.
Cackling Kamala is just like my Aunt Tillie. She gets louder and louder, talking over you regardless if she is right or wrong. But during the interview she wasn't right a single time, and we learned only that she is a monster - ugly attitude, nasty and arrogant. Just like Aunt Tillie.

TRUMP 2024
MAGA

Once again, a ONE sided comment from you.  What should happen to Trump each time HE goes off the rails, which happens at EVERY rally and town hall he does ?

To that point, Trump was President for 4 years from 2016 - 2020.  WHAT did he do about anything ?   Did he fix the border ?  NO    Did he negotiate infrastructure ?   NO   Did he offer a new health care plan, other than a CONCEPT of a plan ?   NO.   Did he address global warming ?  NO   But the one thing he did After his Presidency was complete the destruction of Roe, for which he will pay dearly in less than 30 days.....

Obviously you watch her events with extreme Bias,  thinking about what TRUMP would be saying about her, and then parroting those thoughts.   Nothing you ever post is authentic to YOU.... YOU are a walking talking Trump parody, and your efforts HERE to spoon feed us your bullshit are wasted because YOU are the one that lacks any independent thought or credibility.  You are the WWTS (what would Trump say) posterchild..... and your posts are as feeble as Trump was looking like a fool swaying to music at a Town Hall where HE was supposed to answer questions, but REFUSED.   Kamala has NEVER refused to answer questions, and has been everywhere all at once. 

[EmmetK]

1 hour ago, Suckrates said:

Once again, a ONE sided comment from you.  What should happen to Trump each time HE goes off the rails, which happens at EVERY rally and town hall he does ?

To that point, Trump was President for 4 years from 2016 - 2020.  WHAT did he do about anything ?   Did he fix the border ?  NO    Did he negotiate infrastructure ?   NO   Did he offer a new health care plan, other than a CONCEPT of a plan ?   NO.   Did he address global warming ?  NO   But the one thing he did After his Presidency was complete the destruction of Roe, for which he will pay dearly in less than 30 days.....

Obviously you watch her events with extreme Bias,  thinking about what TRUMP would be saying about her, and then parroting those thoughts.   Nothing you ever post is authentic to YOU.... YOU are a walking talking Trump parody, and your efforts HERE to spoon feed us your bullshit are wasted because YOU are the one that lacks any independent thought or credibility.  You are the WWTS (what would Trump say) posterchild..... and your posts are as feeble as Trump was looking like a fool swaying to music at a Town Hall where HE was supposed to answer questions, but REFUSED.   Kamala has NEVER refused to answer questions, and has been everywhere all at once. 

Really. It is you look at everything thru a one-sided prism. Cackling Kamala, Great. Orange Man, dangerous and evil. You are the last one who should speak about extreme bias. And as for "bullshit", I will certainly defer to you on that as you are expert.

The Fox News interview of Kamala Harris is an excellent example of just how incompetent Cackles is at everything except constant lying. It is also an example of the fact that our legal system has failed when candidates for political office can get away with outright lies and the slander of their opponents, and they routinely get away with it.

Totally dishonest people like Cackling Kamala should be held accountable in court for telling lies and slander, especially when they do so on nationally televised programs, or on widely used social media. Lies told by politicians can influence the opinion of people with poor reasoning ability, that's why Leftists like Kamala constantly tell lies. The Federal Election Commission should be responsible for holding people who are running for office for their lies and deliberately false statements.

With the Leftist Democrats in charge of the government the FEC is as corrupt as the Department of Justice, so we can forget them doing anything during this election.

Thankfully the Cackle Queen showed herself to be exactly what she is, an incompetent liar who is not fit to hold any elective office.

 

Nasty, word salad talking, cackle hen is not good for America!
I wonder if the Democrats who voted for Dementia Joe Biden were hurt when it was decided for them who would represent them, and they didn't get to vote on a favorite candidate.

Come January, she will have plenty of time to go on a Comedy Tour to fine tune her laughing and giggling.

 

 

[Bingo T Dog]

@EmmetK Trump said Jan. 06th was a day of LOVE.  Do you agree?

[EmmetK]

I don't respond to your posts unless there is a link to an msn.com fake news story,

[Stable Genius]

https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2024/10/17/donald-trump-jan--6-day-of-love-univision-town-hall

[Suckrates]

5 hours ago, EmmetK said:

Really. It is you look at everything thru a one-sided prism. Cackling Kamala, Great. Orange Man, dangerous and evil. You are the last one who should speak about extreme bias. And as for "bullshit", I will certainly defer to you on that as you are expert.

The Fox News interview of Kamala Harris is an excellent example of just how incompetent Cackles is at everything except constant lying. It is also an example of the fact that our legal system has failed when candidates for political office can get away with outright lies and the slander of their opponents, and they routinely get away with it.

Totally dishonest people like Cackling Kamala should be held accountable in court for telling lies and slander, especially when they do so on nationally televised programs, or on widely used social media. Lies told by politicians can influence the opinion of people with poor reasoning ability, that's why Leftists like Kamala constantly tell lies. The Federal Election Commission should be responsible for holding people who are running for office for their lies and deliberately false statements.

With the Leftist Democrats in charge of the government the FEC is as corrupt as the Department of Justice, so we can forget them doing anything during this election.

Thankfully the Cackle Queen showed herself to be exactly what she is, an incompetent liar who is not fit to hold any elective office.

 

And now tell us, pre' tell WHAT Trump has shown himself to be ?..... a sexual abusing, 34 indictment, fraudulent Lying FELON..convicted by juries of his peers in courts of LAW, which he holds NO regard for.    He certainly wins the prize for Transparency here.

And what a fool YOU show yourself to be by trying to afford Normalcy on him.   As far as your clapback to me,  its exactly what Trump does when he is confronted with criticism.... just turn it around on your opponent.   You certainly are a good "student" in a pathetic sort of way..... My biases are based on FACTS,  yours are based on hatred and conspiracy theory.  EVERY lie that Trump has told, that you support and spread has been debunked..Tell us, what are YOU serving for Thanksgiving ?   A dog or a cat ?

[Suckrates]

5 hours ago, EmmetK said:

Really. It is you look at everything thru a one-sided prism. Cackling Kamala, Great. Orange Man, dangerous and evil. You are the last one who should speak about extreme bias. And as for "bullshit", I will certainly defer to you on that as you are expert.

The Fox News interview of Kamala Harris is an excellent example of just how incompetent Cackles is at everything except constant lying. It is also an example of the fact that our legal system has failed when candidates for political office can get away with outright lies and the slander of their opponents, and they routinely get away with it.

Totally dishonest people like Cackling Kamala should be held accountable in court for telling lies and slander, especially when they do so on nationally televised programs, or on widely used social media. Lies told by politicians can influence the opinion of people with poor reasoning ability, that's why Leftists like Kamala constantly tell lies. The Federal Election Commission should be responsible for holding people who are running for office for their lies and deliberately false statements.

 

 

And you are living proof of THAT... Trump's lies certainly worked on YOU........The irony of that comment "screams" coming from YOU.....You cant even see that YOU are the product of it....  I wouldnt call it poor reasoning, but downright UNEDUCATED and STUPID...... You really should practice your comments in a mirror before you post and make yourself look like a foolish idiot detached from reality. .    

[Pete1111]

I appreciate how the Harris team captured the spirit of the Al Smith Dinner event, especially the fact-checking bit.  Of course all or most of that is lost on Trump, and most of MAGA.

 

Harris achieved the goal doing the Fox interview.  She knows what to say.  She knows his type 

 

[Suckrates]

13 minutes ago, Pete1111 said:

I appreciate how the Harris team captured the spirit of the Al Smith Dinner event, especially the fact-checking bit.  Of course all or most of that is lost on Trump, and most of MAGA.

 

Harris achieved the goal doing the Fox interview.  She knows what to say.  She knows his type 

 

 

BUT yet she trails him in many swing states.   How do we reconcile with that ?    It will all come down to voter "turnout".  Best scenario, Republican voters who DESPISE Trump but cant vote Harris will stay home,  and Dems will have Monumental turnout.      

[Pete1111]

1 minute ago, Suckrates said:

 

BUT yet she trails him in many swing states.   How do we reconcile with that ?    It will all come down to voter "turnout".  Best scenario, Republican voters who DESPISE Trump but cant vote Harris will stay home,  and Dems will have Monumental turnout.      

I've continued donating to important House and Senate races everywhere.  Strength up and down the ticket helps Harris 

A lot of people have traveled to support her campaign on the ground around the country. 

People around here are driving to Nevada to take part in door knocking events.

Others are doing phone bank events this weekend.

Like Michelle said, pick up the phone and call to find out how to help.

I submitted my ballot immediately.  The Dems know as soon as you vote.  They'll re-focus resources on other voters.

[stevenkesslar]

6 hours ago, Pete1111 said:

I've continued donating to important House and Senate races everywhere.  Strength up and down the ticket helps Harris 

A lot of people have traveled to support her campaign on the ground around the country. 

People around here are driving to Nevada to take part in door knocking events.

Others are doing phone bank events this weekend.

Like Michelle said, pick up the phone and call to find out how to help.

I submitted my ballot immediately.  The Dems know as soon as you vote.  They'll re-focus resources on other voters.

 

There's two big unknowns, both of which make a good argument for Democratic optimism.

1.  To quote Bill Clinton, "arithmetic."

Trump is viewed unfavorably by 52.6 % of voters, according to the 538 average.  Harris is viewed unfavorably by 47.2 % of voters. The math is simple.  A majority of voters could vote for Harris, in what is now a sharp two way race.  And not one of them would view her unfavorably.   But for Trump to get over 48 %, which he never has, he needs people who don't like him to vote for him.  Possible, but not likely.

I think this shows in the Senate races.  Name a swing state, and [name a Democratic Senate candidate] is outperforming Harris.  There are clearly voters who plan to vote for the Democratic Senate candidate, including in states like Pennsylvania and Arizona and Nevada, but are not yet sold on Kamala.  It's possible they will split their tickets.  But it is probably more likely that these voters will break for Harris.  In this case it may be less about holding their nose and more about tolerating the fact that Harris is still somewhat of an unknown.

Kudos to you for putting your money where your mouth is.  There's no question Harris is rocking on money, as is the whole field.  Since Labor Day I have been donating weekly to Harris, Tester, Brown, and then I threw in Florida as a guess for the most likely Senate upset.  In retrospect, probably if there is a lucky break it will be Texas.  But that would have required a Democratic surge that has not happened.  If anything, there has been a modest Republican surge recently . The most likely scenario for Democrats holding the Senate is both Brown and Tester manage to beat the odds.  Which is probably way less than 50/50.  But still worth a gamble and a donation.

2.   Turnout, turnout, and turnout

There's no objective way I know of to really measure who has built the best turnout machine.  That said, for the reasons you state, I'd rather be a Democrat than a Republican in a close race, if turnout mattered.  Democrats have had both time and money to build a massive turnout machine, helped by the huge Harris surge when Biden dropped out.  Again, this is really 80 % math.  If Democrats can get their voters out they will win.

This goes to the heart of why polling is useless right now, at least to predict whether Harris will win.  It is a reasonable argument that since polls underestimated Trump in both 2016 and 2020, they will do so again in 2024.  But pollsters have no basis for actually measuring who will turn out. Which is the problem.  Alan Lichtman will add that in addition to being useless in general, since 2020 polls have mostly overcompensated and underestimated Democrats, not Republicans.  Hence the AWOL "red wave" in 2022.

I have a turnout theory that explains why 2024 looks favorable that makes sense to me as a community organizer, but can't be proved.  

In 2016 there was a feel of a grassroots insurgency to Trump.  He was new and fresh, at least to politics.  Hillary carried decades of baggage.  And suffered from a deep and divisive split in the 2016 primary.  Which Lichtman would identify as one of the key nails in her coffin.  All of this would seem to have helped Trump and hurt Clinton with turnout at the margin.  And Clinton lost in 2016 at the margin.

In 2020 Trump faced headwinds, thanks to all the COVID disasters that many people have chosen to forget.  But all through 2019 and 2020 there were stories about how Trump was building this massive turnout machine.  Four years later, I still can't find any decent analysis about what that was about, and what impact - if any- it had.  So it could be just campaign bullshit.  But what we do know is that what was supposed to be a blue wave ended up being a very close race.  And especially in SoCal a lot of Democratic House members that won in 2018 lost.  Those losses helped set up the Democratic loss of the House in 2022.  And at the local level lots of those Democratic incumbents said that the single most important nail in their coffin in 2020 was that Democrats were timid about grassroots turnout, thanks to COVID.  Whereas Republicans were much more aggressive, at least according to lots of articles at the time.  That alone could explain why Trump and Republicans, while losing, exceeded expectations in 2020.

2024 is almost certainly wired well for Democratic turnout.  As we have both stated, there is massive grassroots energy on the Harris side - both in terms of money and volunteers.  Trump has the feeling of a social movement, like in 2016.  But it is no greater than 2016, and probably smaller.  Since it seems to be limited to his minority base.  Yet all these swing voters are definitely NOT feeling that great MAGA vibe that only a precious few can genuinely savor, like dear @EmmetK 🤢  Meanwhile, he has farmed out turnout to outside paid groups who have no real motivation other than to get paid shitty wages, I'd guess.  Republicans who know how campaigns work have been raising red flags about this in articles for months.  

So the idea that Trump always outperforms his poll numbers (well, twice) may not hold up that well in 2024.  I think Democrats are extremely likely to outperform Republicans on turnout - the opposite of 2020.

 

 

[Stable Genius]

[stevenkesslar]

2 hours ago, stevenkesslar said:

2024 is almost certainly wired well for Democratic turnout.

I'll add this as an anecdotal postscript to my point about turnout.   First bad news, then good news.

Dems see warning signs for Harris with Latino men in Pennsylvania

Harris’ performance with Pennsylvania’s 580,000 registered Latino voters could tip the entire election.

Okay.   Bad news:  that headline sounds ominous.

The article notes that Trump is three things Harris can never be: macho, macho, and macho.  The theory has been around for a while that, particularly with Latino men, the testicle vote really matters.  I think we all know that if it comes down to who has bigger balls, Trump beats Harris every time.  Not that it's saying much, of course.  😉

There's also the theory that Trump appeals to the Hispanic male working class because, after all, he's a working class kind of guy.  Who is good to the working class.  Well, not really.  But if there is a possibly fatal "wall of lava" coming at Harris, as one consultant aptly put it, the volcano that caused it was Mount Inflation.  That said, I'm guessing most working class Hispanic Dads would prefer tax credits for their kids to tax cuts for billionaire investors.

Either way, when you read the whole story you get this:

Quote

 

The uneven outreach is reflected in campaign spending targeting Latino voters in the state. The Harris campaign and her Democratic allies have pumped nearly $2 million into Spanish-language TV ads in Pennsylvania, while the Trump campaign and his Republican allies have spent only $175,000 on Spanish-language ads, according to AdImpact, an ad-tracking firm. The Harris campaign has 30 staffers dedicated to Latino outreach in the state, while the Trump campaign has one.

I'm tempted to say that sounds like Trump has one hand tied behind his back when it comes to turnout.  But it's more like he doesn't have hands at all, compared to Harris door knockers.  At least he has those balls.  They count for something, you know.

If the 2024 election is won on organizing and turnout, Harris and Democrats win.

 

 

[Pete1111]

2 hours ago, stevenkesslar said:

 

There's two big unknowns, both of which make a good argument for Democratic optimism.

1.  To quote Bill Clinton, "arithmetic."

Trump is viewed unfavorably by 52.6 % of voters, according to the 538 average.  Harris is viewed unfavorably by 47.2 % of voters. The math is simple.  A majority of voters could vote for Harris, in what is now a sharp two way race.  And not one of them would view her unfavorably.   But for Trump to get over 48 %, which he never has, he needs people who don't like him to vote for him.  Possible, but not likely.

I think this shows in the Senate races.  Name a swing state, and [name a Democratic Senate candidate] is outperforming Harris.  There are clearly voters who plan to vote for the Democratic Senate candidate, including in states like Pennsylvania and Arizona and Nevada, but are not yet sold on Kamala.  It's possible they will split their tickets.  But it is probably more likely that these voters will break for Harris.  In this case it may be less about holding their nose and more about tolerating the fact that Harris is still somewhat of an unknown.

Kudos to you for putting your money where your mouth is.  There's no question Harris is rocking on money, as is the whole field.  Since Labor Day I have been donating weekly to Harris, Tester, Brown, and then I threw in Florida as a guess for the most likely Senate upset.  In retrospect, probably if there is a lucky break it will be Texas.  But that would have required a Democratic surge that has not happened.  If anything, there has been a modest Republican surge recently . The most likely scenario for Democrats holding the Senate is both Brown and Tester manage to beat the odds.  Which is probably way less than 50/50.  But still worth a gamble and a donation.

2.   Turnout, turnout, and turnout

There's no objective way I know of to really measure who has built the best turnout machine.  That said, for the reasons you state, I'd rather be a Democrat than a Republican in a close race, if turnout mattered.  Democrats have had both time and money to build a massive turnout machine, helped by the huge Harris surge when Biden dropped out.  Again, this is really 80 % math.  If Democrats can get their voters out they will win.

This goes to the heart of why polling is useless right now, at least to predict whether Harris will win.  It is a reasonable argument that since polls underestimated Trump in both 2016 and 2020, they will do so again in 2024.  But pollsters have no basis for actually measuring who will turn out. Which is the problem.  Alan Lichtman will add that in addition to being useless in general, since 2020 polls have mostly overcompensated and underestimated Democrats, not Republicans.  Hence the AWOL "red wave" in 2022.

I have a turnout theory that explains why 2024 looks favorable that makes sense to me as a community organizer, but can't be proved.  

In 2016 there was a feel of a grassroots insurgency to Trump.  He was new and fresh, at least to politics.  Hillary carried decades of baggage.  And suffered from a deep and divisive split in the 2016 primary.  Which Lichtman would identify as one of the key nails in her coffin.  All of this would seem to have helped Trump and hurt Clinton with turnout at the margin.  And Clinton lost in 2016 at the margin.

In 2020 Trump faced headwinds, thanks to all the COVID disasters that many people have chosen to forget.  But all through 2019 and 2020 there were stories about how Trump was building this massive turnout machine.  Four years later, I still can't find any decent analysis about what that was about, and what impact - if any- it had.  So it could be just campaign bullshit.  But what we do know is that what was supposed to be a blue wave ended up being a very close race.  And especially in SoCal a lot of Democratic House members that won in 2018 lost.  Those losses helped set up the Democratic loss of the House in 2022.  And at the local level lots of those Democratic incumbents said that the single most important nail in their coffin in 2020 was that Democrats were timid about grassroots turnout, thanks to COVID.  Whereas Republicans were much more aggressive, at least according to lots of articles at the time.  That alone could explain why Trump and Republicans, while losing, exceeded expectations in 2020.

2024 is almost certainly wired well for Democratic turnout.  As we have both stated, there is massive grassroots energy on the Harris side - both in terms of money and volunteers.  Trump has the feeling of a social movement, like in 2016.  But it is no greater than 2016, and probably smaller.  Since it seems to be limited to his minority base.  Yet all these swing voters are definitely NOT feeling that great MAGA vibe that only a precious few can genuinely savor, like dear @EmmetK 🤢  Meanwhile, he has farmed out turnout to outside paid groups who have no real motivation other than to get paid shitty wages, I'd guess.  Republicans who know how campaigns work have been raising red flags about this in articles for months.  

So the idea that Trump always outperforms his poll numbers (well, twice) may not hold up that well in 2024.  I think Democrats are extremely likely to outperform Republicans on turnout - the opposite of 2020.

 

 

Has Lichtman offered any recent comment? 

The Democrats use their own data for guidance and pay less attention to much of the independent polling.  Russia hacked their data in 2016 and handed it to the Trump crime family.  That had to be a factor in the final outcome in 2016 vs. 2020.

The Democrats have a much better look this cycle, much better than the MAGA clowns.  Nobody wants to bet wrong, but there is a sense among some of my Vlogs that Harris will either win a close one or possibly a landslide.

As far as the Senate, it would be awesome for an upset in Florida or Texas.  I am counting on Osborne winning in Nebraska.  Would be interesting with Osborne and Sanders in the Senate and Walz presiding.

[Pete1111]

35 minutes ago, stevenkesslar said:

I'll add this as an anecdotal postscript to my point about turnout.   First bad news, then good news.

Dems see warning signs for Harris with Latino men in Pennsylvania

Harris’ performance with Pennsylvania’s 580,000 registered Latino voters could tip the entire election.

Okay.   Bad news:  that headline sounds ominous.

The article notes that Trump is three things Harris can never be: macho, macho, and macho.  The theory has been around for a while that, particularly with Latino men, the testicle vote really matters.  I think we all know that if it comes down to who has bigger balls, Trump beats Harris every time.  Not that it's saying much, of course.  😉

There's also the theory that Trump appeals to the Hispanic male working class because, after all, he's a working class kind of guy.  Who is good to the working class.  Well, not really.  But if there is a possibly fatal "wall of lava" coming at Harris, as one consultant aptly put it, the volcano that caused it was Mount Inflation.  That said, I'm guessing most working class Hispanic Dads would prefer tax credits for their kids to tax cuts for billionaire investors.

Either way, when you read the whole story you get this:

I'm tempted to say that sounds like Trump has one hand tied behind his back when it comes to turnout.  But it's more like he doesn't have hands at all, compared to Harris door knockers.  At least he has those balls.  They count for something, you know.

If the 2024 election is won on organizing and turnout, Harris and Democrats win.

 

 

Have the Dems focused energy on the black vote while leaving none for the Hispanic vote?  That was my impression 4 years ago.  They seemed clueless.  Just like their using PASSWORD for their password in 2016?  Not knowing or giving proper thought how to protect all the assets.

Mexico just elected President Claudia Sheinbaum.  If the Dems were on their game they could get creative within Mexican American audiences, vlogs, radio, etc to focus on our future with these two women.

I suppose there are laws against Sheinbaum being directly involved but not against using her image.

[stevenkesslar]

2 hours ago, Pete1111 said:

I am counting on Osborne winning in Nebraska.

 

It's possible his testicles are bigger than Trump's.  If some guy can pull off the right look, this is it.

 

 

2 hours ago, Pete1111 said:

Has Lichtman offered any recent comment? 

And below is a Lichtman/Luntz love fest.  As always, he says the polls have little reliable value in making predictions.  Helpfully, he reminded us that right around now in October 2012 Romney was supposedly surging.  His prediction that Obama would win proved accurate.

 

 

 

 

[Suckrates]

MY prediction is that either Harris or Trump will win !   😏

[EmmetK]

Cackling Kamala was pathetic in the FOX interview. 
As I watched Cackles continually talking over Brett, and ignoring all of his questions, I couldn't help but think she was mad and hungover! And somehow no matter the question..it was all Trump's fault!!? 

 

The cackles cover up her real attitude. When push comes to shove, the mask comes off and her anger comes out. She has an attitude of "covert hostility " like a grinning mugger with a knife hidden behind the back. Her attitude at the worst, is complete apathy - "I am not responsible for any of America's problems, it's someone else's (Trump) fault!" "Millions of illegals crossed the border in the last four years, many of them criminal gang members, sex traffickers, many carrying fentanyl. Even though I am the border czar, it's not my fault!"

This is worse than Dementia Joe Biden - at least he sometimes confronts problems, though with antagonism, which is not a good way to discuss things with other leaders - calling them names like "xenophobe" or "dictator."

There is good news on the way. Trump is surging in the polls. 
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4942104-trump-gains-race-white-house/

I'm all ready for my Election night celebration.

Trump Steaks on the grill and chilled Trump Wine

TRUMP 2024
MAGA

[Suckrates]

19 minutes ago, EmmetK said:

Cackling Kamala was pathetic in the FOX interview. 
As I watched Cackles continually talking over Brett, and ignoring all of his questions, I couldn't help but think she was mad and hungover! And somehow no matter the question..it was all Trump's fault!!? 

 

The cackles cover up her real attitude. When push comes to shove, the mask comes off and her anger comes out. She has an attitude of "covert hostility " like a grinning mugger with a knife hidden behind the back. Her attitude at the worst, is complete apathy - "I am not responsible for any of America's problems, it's someone else's (Trump) fault!" "Millions of illegals crossed the border in the last four years, many of them criminal gang members, sex traffickers, many carrying fentanyl. Even though I am the border czar, it's not my fault!"

This is worse than Dementia Joe Biden - at least he sometimes confronts problems, though with antagonism, which is not a good way to discuss things with other leaders - calling them names like "xenophobe" or "dictator."

There is good news on the way. Trump is surging in the polls. 
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4942104-trump-gains-race-white-house/

I'm all ready for my Election night celebration.

Trump Steaks on the grill and chilled Trump Wine

TRUMP 2024
MAGA

 

I'm not sure what interview YOU are talking about or what polls you speak of, but the TRUTH is that almost every media outlet reported that Baier talked over Harris, and there is no SURGE in any poll.   some show Harris ahead and others show Trump leading.   So my conclusion is that you have a wonderful imagination, and make things up in your head to match the way you WANT things to be,  which is often not how the reality is.   So both you and Trump have cognitive disability, and extreme Delusion.

Once the election is over, and you come back down to earth, I hope you will seek help.  Perhaps you can share therapy sessions with Trump ?  

[EmmetK]

1 hour ago, Suckrates said:

 

I'm not sure what interview YOU are talking about or what polls you speak of, but the TRUTH is that almost every media outlet reported that Baier talked over Harris, and there is no SURGE in any poll.   some show Harris ahead and others show Trump leading.   So my conclusion is that you have a wonderful imagination, and make things up in your head to match the way you WANT things to be,  which is often not how the reality is.   So both you and Trump have cognitive disability, and extreme Delusion.

Once the election is over, and you come back down to earth, I hope you will seek help.  Perhaps you can share therapy sessions with Trump ?  

You may not see a surge (and your biased opinion is meaningless), but the Hill, a non-partisan site does:
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4942104-trump-gains-race-white-house/

Cackles can’t answer a single question because the Harris/Biden policies have all really hurt the American people, America and the entire world. So, what ever the question the answer is Orange Man bad his fault or I was born in the middle class. She basically said herself that she is the DEI hire role model. Probably the only true thing she said throughout this campaign. The Cackling Queen suffers from ASD. This type of autism makes it hard to communicate, hard to speak a coherent sentence, and keep repeating yourself. Classic signs. So of course every answer was Donald Trump Donald Trump Donald Trump.

Kamala Harris is without a doubt the stupidest person ever to run for office in this country. Her "law degree" from a HBCU is as worthless as the paper it was printed on. I am convinced her bar exam was a piece of paper with this printed on it, "Write your name on this paper with the crayon provided, you may print, it does not have to be cursive, spelling is not important". "You may ask your personal proctor for assistance if necessary or if you do not understand the question". "You have three hours, unless you need more. Ask your proctor to explain". Between she and the Cowardly Liar, are empty vessels, motivated by the promise of wealth and power, that they will never see.

Trump 2024
MAGA