Members Riobard Posted July 11 Members Share Posted July 11 7 hours ago, Travelingguy said: Framing someone for this type of crime would be very dangerous, because one would have to have possession of the material to plant it or transmit it. The risk of having it backfire in their face is high enough that I think that very few people would be foolish enough to try to pull that off. No framing necessary. The FBI works on a longitudinal pyramid model, inducting where possible each person charged to informant status for a large percentage downward variance on punishment, each truly culpable fool interlocked with the one before and after in sequence and spurring probable cause. It’s a solid example of the HumanCentiPad trend. You see what patterns occur in the actual offence realm replicated in media-generated public opinion. For my part, I try my best not to swallow the smoking overblown drivel emitted from anuses. Others are keen to have their lips surgically stitched to others’ rectums for a sense of belonging and sympatico. unicorn 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Riobard Posted July 11 Members Share Posted July 11 9 hours ago, Latbear4blk said: Read carefully the charges. For many that’s less important than seeking attention with fake news, but you know that. Latbear4blk 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Riobard Posted July 11 Members Share Posted July 11 On 7/10/2024 at 3:18 AM, khaolakguy said: Or as the Liverpool anthem puts it, "you'll never wank alone". What does this have to do with the subject of child sexual abuse other than that perps similarly sing it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Riobard Posted July 11 Members Share Posted July 11 On 7/10/2024 at 3:37 AM, Olddaddy said: He (allegedly) had a very obscene fetish that he spent time on. That is not at all alleged. He is faced with the very serious charge of possession and reciprocal transmission of child pornography. Child sexual abuse is not fetishistic. Children are not inanimate. Obscene fetishism is an oxymoron. The exploitation behind the porn clinically reflects enacted pedophilia if pedophilia underpins true subjective arousal. It is plausible in many cases that illicit content, notwithstanding its heinous nature, exists to pander to a follower base more accurately meeting the diagnostic criteria of pedophilia. Wouid it be too much to ask folks to comprehend what they are understandably reactive about? That said, the syndrome of pedophilia itself is not an offence. The ‘Daddy’ scene is legal and acceptable insofar as it is a play on human developmental differential. Unfortunately it’s the thin edge of a wedge potentially leading to loss of bearings particularly where money is involved and it intersects with large and follower niche subpopulations wherein demographic pedophilic representation inevitably exists. More in keeping with the balanced part of your viewpoint, being a dumb, selfish, greedy lug doesn’t make anyone a person with pedophilia. It may be arguably worse than pedophilia but it’s not pedophilia unless it is. Such a diagnostic formulation wouid only occur in the context of an individual seeking paraphilia assessment and/or treatment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Riobard Posted July 11 Members Share Posted July 11 7 hours ago, gayinpattaya said: Very true, but stalkers and ex-lovers have been known to murder before. Some people will go to any lengths. Either way it's a good reminder to all to be in control of your digital security. Better yet, don’t be in a position where a firewall is the one flimsy thing making the difference between freedom and the hole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keithambrose Posted July 11 Share Posted July 11 3 hours ago, Riobard said: Better yet, don’t be in a position where a firewall is the one flimsy thing making the difference between freedom and the hole. How do you block people on here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Latbear4blk Posted July 11 Members Share Posted July 11 53 minutes ago, Keithambrose said: How do you block people on here? When you place your pointer on top of a member's icon profile, you will have a window popping up. Chose the "ignore" option. reader 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khaolakguy Posted July 11 Share Posted July 11 5 hours ago, Latbear4blk said: When you place your pointer on top of a member's icon profile, you will have a window popping up. Chose the "ignore" option. Thanks, this thread has persuaded me to add two posters to ignore. I never ignored anyone before, here or elsewhere! reader and Latbear4blk 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Latbear4blk Posted July 11 Members Share Posted July 11 2 hours ago, khaolakguy said: Thanks, this thread has persuaded me to add two posters to ignore. I never ignored anyone before, here or elsewhere! I'm curious! I think I know one of them. I actually thought this is a light thread. The only one about AW surviving out of the three forums in which I participate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keithambrose Posted July 12 Share Posted July 12 15 hours ago, Latbear4blk said: When you place your pointer on top of a member's icon profile, you will have a window popping up. Chose the "ignore" option. Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
