Off Topic Thread June 3 and before

[Riobard]

13 minutes ago, Half-vaccinated said:

Yes you are missy.  Stone cokehead is the term I'm told.  To each his own vices, enjoy🤣🤣🤣🥶.   But it's the International Online Scamming that you perpetuate against unsuspecting gay tourist I find alarming.  How could you? 😡🤬🤬 And to think we were in a safe sharing space.😥

A propos of this comment, do keep your vaccination records of any regimen, half, complete, what have you, locked up in a safe. We can see all sizes and backgrounds, young, big, pint-level included, are open targets for bullying. 

[SolaceSoul]

1 hour ago, Riobard said:

Anybody in possession of my identification or facsimile thereof is holding stolen or misappropriated property. Anybody that has declared such possession is, similarly, in violation of the law. I believe it is termed identification theft

Um, that’s not how it works, Counselor. That’s not how any of it works.

[SolaceSoul]

54 minutes ago, Half-vaccinated said:

Yes you are missy.  Stone cokehead is the term I'm told.  To each his own vices, enjoy🤣🤣🤣🥶.   But it's the International Online Scamming that you perpetuate against unsuspecting gay tourist I find alarming.  How could you? 😡🤬🤬 And to think we were in a safe sharing space.😥

Oh, do tell more about what you think you know, Nancy Drew. This ought to be good. 

 

[Latbear4blk]

8 hours ago, SolaceSoul said:

Ha! That’s hilarious. I’ve never even smoked a tobacco cigarette in my entire life, much less a hard drug. As for coke, I do like a good and Coke — Cuba Libre. But keep digging! I do admire your tenacity and thirst for knowledge — even if you keep coming up empty. 

This is probably a case of half-brained projection. Stupidely telling.

[Riobard]

29 minutes ago, Latbear4blk said:

This is probably a case of half-brained projection. Stupidely telling.

This comment makes no sense. Yes you are stupid in the telling. You would be saying that somebody that responded to HV was projecting. A person may project introjects but not behavioural uptake of drugs. Likely was a projection of self-admiration; that tracks. I believe you are an avid cannabis consumer and project erotic images of youth. You might project cannabis by shot-gunning? I don’t know all the terms.  But picking on HV tracks. Perhaps the only young fellas of value are those that pepper your blog agenda. Pompous arbitrary sorting much? I suggest you tamp down the amateurish formulations. I believe your drug use could be exacerbating impulsivity. Hazing him may be a projection of a drug haze; there, run with that in your next post. I’ve closed with a stupid idiom, but you might appropriate it. 

[SolaceSoul]

44 minutes ago, Latbear4blk said:

This is probably a case of half-brained projection. Stupidely telling.

Could very be, who knows? There’s an entire group of (mostly) black American travelers that often comes down to Santo Domingo and does “recreational” drugs. Not my thing, and I’ve somehow managed to avoid drug use for a lifetime without even having a hint of curiosity. I don’t judge people for doing it, but I prefer for anyone to do it far away from me. Drug users tend to congregate with one another, anyway. They tend not to like “squares”. 

Now, had he accused me of sipping a few too many Cuba Libres or caipirinhas… hell, guilty as charged! 

[Riobard]

4 hours ago, paborn said:

I'm , often, mystified by what I read here. But, this???? 

This, the doing lines quip I see in the quote, is classic decompensation meets troll hour meets cluelessness. DM if you like. You seem to be one of the brighter lights on the tree. The post he dropped was big on noise, minuscule on signal in the noise/signal ratio. Having fun yet? 

[floridarob]

4 hours ago, paborn said:

I'm , often, mystified by what I read here. But, this???? 

I'm referring to Riobard and Half vaccinated....they seem to have gone wayyyyy off the rails, together and at the same  time 😲

[Riobard]

My expectations, to be clear, as written threats have been made here regarding sharing my government issued identity, or any version of my actual identity, for that matter, are that I forbid it. This is on the record here, but naturally limited in direct targeted messaging by the degree to which I am privy to any information regarding most members other than Board pseudonyms. 

I do not expect that my identity would be appropriated by another, ie, somebody would masquerade as me, but obviously that is similarly prohibited. 

What mystifies me is how a member would extort another member with assertions of possession of said identity and threats of sharing my government identity details without my consent, and do so with impunity on our board. I have not provided this information to any other board member at any time, knowingly or volitionally. I do not consent to any dissemination of such information. 

At this juncture, what I will do is circle back to my USA academic contacts to apprise them of further developments regarding a previous unfortunate exposure to an individual  that may be a person of interest regarding masquerading as a particular class of professional. Such an impersonation, if substantiated, would not go over very well within medical school settings up here where I have faculty status. I am probably as correct in my assumptions as previously but will be open to being disabused of mistaken suppositions. The possible misappropriation of my government identity puts a new slant on it.

As far as I gather there has been no reversal of the hostage aspect of my government ID. 

[Axiom2020]

10 hours ago, Riobard said:

Half right half-vaxx.

Let’s back this up. 

The OP never had an issue with your content.

Lurking trolls will spread shade at any opening they can get and where the shade lands is usually random and often peculiar. Like the flavour of the week. They may be inclined to misappropriate the true provenance of terms such as ‘ugly American’.

Narcissistic scammers within the lurking troll community will declare a vigilante stance over the most droll occurrences, putting forward implausible deniability about MO. In this case we see an open admission from such a narcissist S that his selectively gunning for somebody R was that, via hearsay, a third party, B presumably as B is the most likely candidate (besides T and F the only others possible otherwise, having personally crossed paths with R) didn’t particularly like somebody he eventually crossed paths with, R, with whom a positive exchange over months previously lead to a meet-up for a meal.

Historically, S is a bitch on wheels with R and prone to amateurish diagnostic formulation. This is ironic considering R’s status. S openly described legitimizing his insane belligerence by attempting to distance himself from obvious manifestations of narcissism attributed to him. His source B was somehow cloned and evidently a series of mitosis yielded an enormous grouping of persons throwing shade on R. Delusions abound. S also declared personal contact with R in a mutual setting, a contact that never occurred but was fabricated scam-grade in a desperate manipulative attempt to self-justify his pejorative impressions. High-grade manipulative weaponry is the hallmark of a narcissist. 

S’s ground-bound cape progressively shredded owing to R’s astute grasp of reality, S then misanthropically appropriated the shenanigans of L(J), U, and M, themselves narcissistically inclined, related to their inappropriate cunty assertions that a member on another board and R, here, are the same person. S having done this is reflected to R by a friend as R is not want to view the toxic material of a flagrant narcissist. This sad ungentlemanly behaviour, now reported on two boards and under review, also reeks of implausible deniability and what we see is the representation of a few pathetic jackasses slithering about and a few small-minded minions getting sucked in by them.

R doesn’t have a pressing need for allies and interprets lack of open board empathy as reflective of understandable distance stance from conflict, not as cowardice. R has a backchannel support system here and a radius of personal social support.

Getting back to B; B, an inveterate scammer himself, would have wondered why R’s demeanour changed when on to the scam. B is not well. R has known and worked with others that impersonate various high-profile professions. An abrupt change in R-B dynamics and desperation by B to maintain his scam seems to be the source of the aspersions cast upon R and that form the basis of S’s narcissistic ammo. My friend tells me that a few out of control maniacs here may have identifying info about R they are open to sharing. Nobody here would consent to it and if being held hostage is not grounds for a ban, what is? These assertions (by S? others?) are, well you get the picture. These last few assumptions are less verifiable because R never openly confronted B and R can only assume that S’s reference to a young person is B. R’s friend described that S has declared a cadre in type and age of members that have labelled R as creepy, unhinged, mentally unwell.

B may be sociopathic and an in-person encounter was what flipped the lid off the black box of his fabrications. R has never shared B’s ID or handle. B had staked a claim to a bizarrely vast set of professional credentials and affiliations. R, himself a high profile academic, cannot fathom why B thought R so naïve. B apparently catfishes locals with fraudulent social capital. B is charming on the surface and it is sad that B cannot just be himself. R has no desire to harm B but referencing him is essential in elucidating the well-established history of S’s derogatory and condescending commentary. In some ways, B and S should just get a room. However, two personality disorders fellows would not fly well, inn’t. B and R have a lengthy recorded text history. If B were to have breached boundaries, not surprising for a characterologically unhinged fellow, and as my friend has suggested when reading the thread, the Hiroshima/Nagasaki fallout would be such that the person most likely to brush off the ashes and walk away is R, make no mistake. R has all the goods, has B’s ‘number’.

Openly disclosing info about R is forbidden. A written record of slander/libel now exists. A statement of blackmail lives on the board. Guess who is in control. R’e assumptions about B are presumptive and R reserves definitive judgement but Hakim’s Razor is often a solid guiding principle. R has not revealed B’s identity and would wish to be judicious in this regard. However, R would welcome any concrete record of what was said about R behind R’s back, and if in conjunction with ID, that has taken things to a very different level. 

T and R are friends. F may be somebody that can grow on R, an acquired taste taken in small doses, but runs in many directions. One can take or leave F and he can be inflammatory according to some of his content. R can handle F as F is well, basic, basic and at heart a good guy, maybe? B is out of the picture for years but it appears lives in perpetuity vis-a-vis S’ batch of flimsy slings and arrows.
R has no interest in a connection with L(J), U, or M. S is somebody R wouldn’t give the time of day to but S certainly applies for such time and attention relentlessly. S is the most interesting from an academic viewpoint, a scratching post rehearsal for the exigency of how-to manuals related to co-existing among social media trolls. S is not definitively a narcissist and R has described impressions but a formal diagnosis is deferred and is not R’s role or prerogative. It’s just social media Board, and perceptions are, as such, subject to limits.

So, scammer is an apt term as put forward by HV. Coke merely a metaphor for insatiable attention-seeking cravings. Coke is corrosive. Don’t drink the coke. R would not drink coke between clinically related expert witness testimony breaks.

WTF?   You must have volumes of time on your hand in order to have written the aforementioned.  DAMN!

[12is12]

Axiom, riobard doesnt merely "have volumes of time"; posting here is his whole life. 

He isnt writing for others to read; he has already been repeatedly told his posts arent read. He is a person in love with his own verbosity. 

I wish others would just stop feeding the beast.

[Half-vaccinated]

15 hours ago, Latbear4blk said:

This is probably a case of half-brained projection. Stupidely telling.

 

[Half-vaccinated]

15 hours ago, SolaceSoul said:

Could very be, who knows? There’s an entire group of (mostly) black American travelers that often comes down to Santo Domingo and does “recreational” drugs. Not my thing, and I’ve somehow managed to avoid drug use for a lifetime without even having a hint of curiosity. I don’t judge people for doing it, but I prefer for anyone to do it far away from me. Drug users tend to congregate with one another, anyway. They tend not to like “squares”. 

Now, had he accused me of sipping a few too many Cuba Libres or caipirinhas… hell, guilty as charged! 

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks."  Neither did he address his SCAMMING of gays that visit that island.  

[Latbear4blk]

8 minutes ago, Half-vaccinated said:

 

As I said, stupidly telling. 

But I see you are a follower! I apologize, even stalkers are good to give us clicks. I love even the most idiotic followers! ❤️

[Half-vaccinated]

20 minutes ago, Latbear4blk said:

As I said, stupidly telling. 

But I see you are a follower! I apologize, even stalkers are good to give us clicks. I love even the most idiotic followers! ❤️

Dont flatter yourself Girl Monsta. There is NOTHING about you interesting.  Actually, I find you repugnant.

[Half-vaccinated]

On 5/29/2023 at 6:59 PM, SolaceSoul said:

No, you don’t have it right, Brainiac. No one here referred to BlkSuperman as “deplorable”. That was referring to the comments made here by another poster — to which both LatBear and I responded.

 

They do find you deplorable in the Beer Garden.  And I find you equally deplorable for scamming gay tourist Online. 

fyi.

if you talked to a fake account that requested money, favors, ubers on twitter/grinder/a4a/skkokar/jack'd etc etc. It was Dis Bitch. ⬆️

You been warned.

[Latbear4blk]

2 hours ago, Half-vaccinated said:

Dont flatter yourself Girl Monsta. There is NOTHING about you interesting.  Actually, I find you repugnant.

Mi amor. You keep talking, and we keep learning.🥰

[SolaceSoul]

3 hours ago, Half-vaccinated said:

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks."  Neither did he address his SCAMMING of gays that visit that island.  

I’m waiting to hear this story. Do tell!

[SolaceSoul]

2 hours ago, Half-vaccinated said:

They do find you deplorable in the Beer Garden.  And I find you equally deplorable for scamming gay tourist Online. 

fyi.

if you talked to a fake account that requested money, favors, ubers on twitter/grinder/a4a/skkokar/jack'd etc etc. It was Dis Bitch. ⬆️

You been warned.

Unlike your newfound equally batshit friend Rioblather, I welcome you to reveal who you think I am — because unlike him, I am 100% confident that this is not me.

So go ahead, tell all you think you know, names, photos, everything.

WTF is a Beer Garden? 

[paborn]

18 hours ago, floridarob said:

I'm referring to Riobard and Half vaccinated....they seem to have gone wayyyyy off the rails, together and at the same  time 😲

I know. I was supporting you - sorry to be opaque

[Latbear4blk]

@TotallyOz, do you not want to lock this thread?

[Lucky]

So does this give us an idea on who was banned? Or half-banned?

[Latbear4blk]

On 6/3/2023 at 10:45 AM, Lucky said:

So does this give us an idea on who was banned? Or half-banned?

I think Half-brained is now SOB in CoM.