‘Recently updated’ & recent ‘Posts’

[Riobard]

I would benefit from these sections a lot more if the ubiquitous photo posters would collapse their huge volume of topic headings into broader headings. I don’t need to see a theme for every photo subset. Besides which the message board was not intended to disproportionately cater to photos that can be found in a multitude of other locations.

Much of the space in the two sections is utilized by a very small number of frequent posters of pics, displacing/pushing out the clues that other topics are updated. 

[Suckrates]

STOP complaining and try contributing more.   If you havent noticed, this site isnt very well traveled, so any contributions that invite viewership should be welcomed....

If you are having a problem with the mechanics of the board, speak with the Admins about it.  I dont believe this site was designed specifically for YOU and your comfort level?

I guess there always has to be one "complainer" in the bunch ?  

[Riobard]

13 minutes ago, Suckrates said:

STOP complaining and try contributing more.   If you havent noticed, this site isnt very well traveled, so any contributions that invite viewership should be welcomed....

If you are having a problem with the mechanics of the board, speak with the Admins about it.  I dont believe this site was designed specifically for YOU and your comfort level?

I guess there always has to be one "complainer" in the bunch ?  

You could have your cake and eat it too, while sharing it. But no. 

You could present your content some viewers like and leave some wiggle room for what I suggested. You are the best candidate to accommodate my suggestion. Passing the buck to admin is not good advice. 

You likely have an unalterable impression of me now, as I now do of you. You are complaining about a perfectly legitimate request that promotes the idea of arranging the two relevant sections in a way that viewership sees a broader cross-section of topics updated, with newer posts.

That’s correct, you are a complainer ... grousing about a recommendation that could improve the site’s optics (while not compromising your rate of posts) makes you a complainer, honeybunch. LOL

[Suckrates]

1 hour ago, Riobard said:

You could have your cake and eat it too, while sharing it. But no. 

You could present your content some viewers like and leave some wiggle room for what I suggested. You are the best candidate to accommodate my suggestion. Passing the buck to admin is not good advice. 

You likely have an unalterable impression of me now, as I now do of you. You are complaining about a perfectly legitimate request that promotes the idea of arranging the two relevant sections in a way that viewership sees a broader cross-section of topics updated, with newer posts.

That’s correct, you are a complainer ... grousing about a recommendation that could improve the site’s optics (while not compromising your rate of posts) makes you a complainer, honeybunch. LOL

Its your opinion and your opinion only.  I dont think this site needs to pander to singular requests.  If you dont like my pic posts or think there is too many of them, just dont VIEW them.  And if you want a site tailor made for yourself, START ONE.....   As for me being a complainer, I said NOTHING until you chimed in with your nit-picking crap.  All I did was provide eye-candy for the members here.   Apparently you dont like to look at naked boys, you just like to complain ?     And if the site has become difficult for you to navigate because of the quantity of my posts, look around...if I dont post there really isnt much activity, so not sure WHY you have a problem ?   Maybe you should look into that?

[Riobard]

I don’t like to look at naked boys or photos of naked boys. That position reflects the majority of queer adult men. 

If that is the content you are posting ... I wouldn’t know because this message board is not a Tumblr offshoot and Tumblr doesn’t interest me anyway ... then your prerogative for posting such content is at the pleasure of the total composite of viewership, of which I am one, though no pleasure yield for me particularly. 

That you continue with impunity is at the discretion of the readership. That you think that what you do is a much needed service to fill the otherwise slow traffic on the board (I disagree with that assessment BTW) then I would have to question your judgement.

I have no personal intention to shut it down, as formal censorship is not my role or on my agenda, and it is the admin’s role to try to filter content, and besides I like erotica, but I don’t like the association between text posts thematically centred on MSM and trade, etc, linked to visual representations of minors. We have generally agreed to let the title of the board stand, the trade-off being a bit of extra vigilance on content that supports impropriety or any notion of illegality. 

I would have preferred to stay ‘on page’ with respect to my simple and reasonable request regarding the basic architecture of the message board, an inarguable  impression that it would vary the visible content in the field boxes of the recent updates and recent posts. But you took it personally and, in pushing back, resorted to the immature tactic of maligning my character. 

I would think that you would be keen to balance your privilege with a bit of respect for a member’s hope that you would graciously reconfigure your contributions and cluster them in larger groupings in order to allow shared space on the two aforementioned site headings.

Reply if you will for the edification of a few others here. I am blocking you. I am not a fan of ‘cancel culture’ but I may discover that the block function eliminates some of the repeat groundhog-day-grade clutter of the two site components and shifts up the variety of update alerts in a way that upticks the value of them. 

Edited September 20, 2020 by Riobard

[Suckrates]

Some people just need to get their priorities straight.  To think you would spend so much time blabbering here about NOTHING when there are so many other important issues to discuss such as covid, the 2020 election, racial inequality, and extreme enviormental issues, shows the true nature of your personality, choosing to COMPLAIN on a gay site devoted to escorts and pretty boys ABOUT the quantity of pics of naked, pretty boys. Its mindblowing and laughable.  You are annoyed by pics because YOU dont look at them, but news flash, this site is NOT about you.... there are others here that like naked boys and enjoy looking at the pics, and indicate as much. .  However now that i am blocked, there is no issue.

Your request was selfish and out of line.  but now that all of this is put to rest, we can return to business as usual. 

So here's one for the road.......

Stay SAFE guys.  

[Lucky]

Where's Rockhard when you need him?

[Suckrates]

8 minutes ago, Lucky said:

Where's Rockhard when you need him?

Maybe YOU need him, but I dont !  

[Lucky]

1 minute ago, Suckrates said:

Maybe YOU need him, but I dont !  

I was being facetious, Suckrates. I like your pictures.

[AdamSmith]

On 9/20/2020 at 11:01 AM, Riobard said:

I would benefit from these sections a lot more if the ubiquitous photo posters would collapse their huge volume of topic headings into broader headings. I don’t need to see a theme for every photo subset. Besides which the message board was not intended to disproportionately cater to photos that can be found in a multitude of other locations.

Much of the space in the two sections is utilized by a very small number of frequent posters of pics, displacing/pushing out the clues that other topics are updated. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Antoinette

[Suckrates]

10 hours ago, AdamSmith said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Antoinette

 

"Let them eat COCK".....  

[kjun12]

Oh my.  Nothing like a good panty-pull by our members.

[AdamSmith]

On 9/24/2020 at 7:37 AM, kjun12 said:

Oh my.  Nothing like a good panty-pull by our members.

I wouldn’t object.