Jump to content
Guest Larstrup

The Organ

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, Larstrup said:

 One of these days Adam I’m going to take a trip down memory lane and go through each page of this thread  from the beginning, as I know I’ve probably posted duplicate videos here, ( of both yours and mine)  but when I came across these two this afternoon I absolutely knew that I hadn’t,  and could not remember you doing so either. They are indeed glorious and sublime sounds bestowed for us by the talent of the organist and further glorified by the construction of the organ itself.

:smile:

They are beautiful.

Thank you, sincerely.

I had not known either of them before.

Posted

Kind of corny over-production, but nonetheless great sampling of why I think Elizabeth Regina is about the coolest human on the planet. B)

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Larstrup said:

C031A0C7-CCB0-49DE-B801-F7FB30322A3B.gif.dcb67d61a63f64fdbeb1b6cbf98907ee.gif

:P

She really hates all the royal protocol, and would much rather sit there in her house sweater, horsing around with her funny grandkid.

Posted

George III, surprisingly to us Amurrcans, was the same way. He liked simple ways, tending by personal hand the farms and orchards and etc on the royal estates. And simple menus at non-State meals. Etc:

he actually sort of disliked being Monarch.

Posted

Adams, educated in one of the first generations to go to Harvard, and deeply versed in the civics of the early Greek city-states and so on; just wanted to run his farm in Braintree, MA.

but then history intervened.

Guest Larstrup
Posted
9 minutes ago, AdamSmith said:

She really hates all the royal protocol, and would much rather sit there in her house sweater, horsing around with her funny grandkid.

 And honestly why wouldn’t she? She’s had her rein of royal queen and protocol and scandal  For decades now, and if Diana’s death didn’t prove to her how empty that soon becomes, her death taught her nothing.  The monarchy survives only at great expense to the family of which it consumes. 

Posted
11 hours ago, Larstrup said:

 And honestly why wouldn’t she? She’s had her rein of royal queen and protocol and scandal  For decades now, and if Diana’s death didn’t prove to her how empty that soon becomes, her death taught her nothing.  The monarchy survives only at great expense to the family of which it consumes. 

And she herself has done much to way cut down the 'Royal List'.

And Charles, funny nut job but well intentioned and, I think, much in tune with our times, has made his own Highgrove estate far more than 'self-sustaining'.

When (if) he ascends, I think he will make a very good and apt monarch for the times he finds himself in.

Posted
On 10/24/2017 at 5:50 AM, AdamSmith said:

 

Note even the subtextual anal-penetrative erotic character [/b] of 'The Rhine gives its gold to the sea.

Das Rheingold!

1200px-RichardWagner.jpg

170px-Adolf_Hitler-1933.jpg

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...