4 foreigners caught in Pattaya

[KhorTose]

I, for one, applaud this effort.

 

Me Two

 

[Guest gwm4sian]

I was told recently that the American, Robert Lond, has had all charges against him dismissed and that he is now a free man with no stain on his record from this incident.

 

I can find nothing in the press or CEOP website to prove/disprove this - can anybody else confirm/deny?

[Guest Astrrro]

They love Thais but they did wrong and broke the law, so we must take action,'' Pol Col Suwitpol said.

 

A soft spoken cop.

[Guest MonkeySee]

I was told recently that the American, Robert Lond, has had all charges against him dismissed and that he is now a free man with no stain on his record from this incident.

The last I heard from a neighbor of his, he is still in town. Not sure if all the charges against him have been dismissed. Many rumors about. Hard to know what is true. The last I heard was the major charge against him had been dismissed but a minor charge was still pending.

 

[Guest taylorsquare]

And why do they commit this offence? "sex with underage boys"

 

I know gaybutton explained in another thread that it was all for a "cum".

 

But this "fetish",(can we call it that,or would you call it a sickness)has so much power for the offender/perp to risk everything,that they are willing to take it.

 

In my own opinion,i really think those who harm children should be locked up forever,but what about those who for example,the recent alleged english guy who got caught propostioning the 10yo boy for sexual services,does he desrve to be locked up?

 

Can psychological counselling be more beneficial in this case?

I really do have empathy for someone as him,the power of his addiction forced him to take risks.

Imagine if you saw a farang that you thought you knew well ,that had this type of "fetish/addiction",sickness" whatever you want to call it.

 

Would you discard him,or try to understand and help him .

 

 

 

[Bob]

It occurs to me that some posters here either condone, accept or excuse these pedophiles.

 

 

Well, it definitely occurs to me that you're wrong.

[Guest lvdkeyes]

Well, it definitely occurs to me that you're wrong.

Read all the postings regarding this topic and if you still think I am wrong, that's your opinion.

[Gaybutton]

Would you discard him,or try to understand and help him .

Very simple. I'd discard him and I wouldn't give a damn about it.

[Bob]

Read all the postings regarding this topic and if you still think I am wrong, that's your opinion.

 

 

Well, your false insinuation at least made me go back and read all the posts on this thread. And there's not a shred of suggestion by anybody that they condone the activity.

 

You've accused "some" of the posters here of condoning pedophilia and, in my view, coming out with a statement like that ("some of you are __________") is absolute bullshit and tends to tar people that don't deserve it. I've been around these boards from the beginning and I know of no one here that condones the activity.

 

So.....presuming you want to accuse somebody on this board of condoning pedophilia, I'd suggest you name the names or quote the posts; otherwise, take your smears elsewhere.

[Gaybutton]

So.....presuming you want to accuse somebody on this board of condoning pedophilia, I'd suggest you name the names or quote the posts; otherwise, take your smears elsewhere.

Gentlemen, I'm putting the 'Whoa Nelly' on this right now. I think everyone here knows that there is no way I'm going to sit by and allow attacks to get started.

 

In fairness lvdkeyes gets to respond to Bob's post if he so chooses. After that, please let's keep it civil so that I don't end up getting caught in the middle and wearing the black hat again if I lock the thread and/or start deleting posts.

 

Fair enough?

[Bob]

Fair enough?

 

Certainly fair enough to me....and I eagerly await his response reflecting, hopefully, some backup for his prior posting.

[Guest jomtien]

Certainly fair enough to me....and I eagerly await his response reflecting, hopefully, some backup for his prior posting.

 

 

I suppose anyone spending time in any Sunee bar that has boys of an iffy age could be said to be "condoning, accepting, or excusing" the system that allows the pederasts/pedophiles/ whatever to have a playground. The only solution is to not go in. Since those are the only gay bars I go into, it's something I think about often.

 

If lvdkeyes meant his post in that sense, I'll agree. If he meant it in the sense of certain posters here, I certainly don't.

 

And before someone goes there, no, I do not take underage boys off. But it does weigh on my mind that I am in some way supporting the system.

 

 

 

 

[Gaybutton]

And before someone goes there, no, I do not take underage boys off.

I can vouch for that. I know Jomtien well enough to know that he has absolutely no interest in under-age boys and under no circumstances would knowingly take such a boy off.

[Guest sabaisabai]

Also know Jomtien....agree with GayButton.

[Rogie]

I most certainly do not know Jomtien

 

However, even before the testimonies started to arrive, it was clear to me reading what he had written that he was sincere.

[Gaybutton]

The following appears in the PATTAYA DAILY NEWS:

_____

 

BRIT PAEDOPHILES FINALLY DEPORTED TO UK

 

As an update to the report on PDN on March 12, about the two convicted British paedophiles, Peter Brian Neilson from Sheffield and Thomas Charles Hadley from Petersfield, Hampshire, we are pleased to announce that these two offenders were deported to the UK, on March 25, following their arrest in Pattaya on March 11, 2009.

 

The two men were arrested by Pattaya police and the Immigration Office following the issuance of an arrest warrant by the UK's Child Exploitation and Protection Agency. The agency apparently has an international tracker team that attempts to keep tabs on convicted sex offenders who pose a risk to children, working both at home in the UK and also abroad. It was by their assiduous efforts in collaboration with Interpol and the Thai police that the two paedophiles were brought to justice.

 

The two men have criminal records and have served prison sentences of 7 and 9 years, respectively, for abusing children in Britain. However, because their British offences occurred before the Sexual Offences Act was introduced in 2003, they avoided having to sign the Sex Offenders' Register and thus slipped off the radar. Having done so they were able to continue preying on children in both Thailand and Cambodia until they surfaced recently. Neilson even ran a website called ‘kids r us’ through which he made contact with vulnerable children.

 

Comments on the website of a newspaper in Neilson’s home town, Sheffield, are apparently no happier about having to have him deported back home. One comment says” Why do we have to have them back here, leave them in a Thai prison to rot or leave them alone with parents for a while.” Other comments recommended dire treatment for the two.

 

Meanwhile, two other British paedophiles , described as ‘child sex monsters’ and ‘sex fiends’ by the UK media are being sought in Thailand. The two are Keith Vincent, 65, from Salisbury, Wilts and Keith Richardson, 61 from Blackpool. Their names have been posted on a “most wanted” internet site by British police because all other attempts to track them down have resulted in failure. Vincent has the reputation of being a potential child killer despite having undergone sex offender treatment in prison. His two previous victims were girls aged 11 and 12 respectively. He is currently thought to be in Bangkok. Richardson, too, confessed “I am a danger to children.” Anyone having knowledge of the whereabouts of either of these two men is urged to contact the police.