So where will the guys go now?

[Suckrates]

1 hour ago, Riobard said:

Kkkkk ... Sucky, I am no friend of the GUY you call Daddy but some folks call Nutter ... I have no clue why any negative term, in the fondest of ways of course. I am banned there. Kneejerk babyish overreactivity the reason. His or mine? You be the judge.

I have subzero interest in any stream of income benefitting anyone over there. He already has the stars of the stars and stripes aligned against him with the new bill. I do not have to retaliate for banishment. 

Dry in the desert ... don't forget lubricating moisturizer on the date plantation excursions. And new reading glasses when you return home. 

 

I honesty had NO idea of your situation over at Daddy's, and you will never figure out the reasoning for any of his actions, cause his reasoning is selective and changes each time.   I was Banned about a dozen times, and then allowed back only to be Banned AGAIN !.   However, this last time, I DIDNT GO BACK ......   But I do understand the lure of the site, and why the "sheep" put up with shit there.  To each their own, I wish everyone well.   But the truth of the matter is that the demise of the Daddy site would NOT be the end of the world (as some fear) !

[AdamSmith]

16 minutes ago, Suckrates said:

the demise of the Daddy site would NOT be the end of the world (as some fear) !

 

[Suckrates]

The fever has stuck and all the Steppford members are out in force praising Daddy for his activism and fight for "the freedom of speech", while the battle crys for donations to help his Norma Ray moment abound.

YET, arent they missing the point ?   Apparently, HE wants free speech everywhere (or is feigning the cause to get money ?)  BUT on his own site,  where he will BAN you for doing just that !     I guess HE is just not that versed in the word HYPOCRISY ?    It's the same blind uneducated loyalty that led Trump to power...  People are just plain STUPID. 

[TotallyOz]

33 minutes ago, Suckrates said:

The fever has stuck and all the Steppford members are out in force praising Daddy for his activism and fight for "the freedom of speech", while the battle crys for donations to help his Norma Ray moment abound.

Listen dude! You are not allowed on this site to comment in a way that causes me to piss myself.  This is your last warning!

 

[Riobard]

Stakeholders need to know this is NOT about freedom of speech.

In the area of commercial sex in the USA, freedom of speech simply means communicating with impunity that you and others should have the option to purchase intimacy and that the laws are not constructed well. That alone is not game-changing, novel, or prosecutable. 

Freedom of advertisement content aspects of commercial sex trade cannot proceed prior to abolishment of commercial vice law. It is like arguing for dessert when you have not satisfactorily accessed the main course. Neither is available, and focusing on the conditions you demand should the first one become available is out of whack. 

Anyone who is naïve enough to donate resources to freedom of speech rather than the agenda of dismantling academic arguments against commercial sex is tragically ill-informed and irretrievably off-page, constructing a fringed surrey when the horse shows no sign of a pulse.

Commercial vice law is short-sighted, to be sure, but any whack job arguing for freedom of marketing expression regarding sex trade is no less ludicrous than lobbying for the prerogative to advertise or shop for whack services. 

[Riobard]

And Suckrates is right about the soapbox Guy's limited capacity for logic. 

[Suckrates]

6 hours ago, TotallyOz said:

Listen dude! You are not allowed on this site to comment in a way that causes me to piss myself.  This is your last warning!

 

 

If ya gonna Ban me, please contact Daddy for the "accommodations" he uses when he exiles people.   Actually "Banishment Island" is quite nice, and very relaxing, and Daddy subjects you to daily "edging".... and there is always a Viagra on your pillow.  

His punishment is actually BETTER than "participating" ON the site.....and its always the smartest and most interesting people that end up there.  The mindless minions he keeps around. !

[Suckrates]

5 hours ago, Riobard said:

And Suckrates is right about the soapbox Guy's limited capacity for logic. 

I just wish "Norma" would get down off her soapbox.  That view up her dirty skirt is NOT pretty.  (and she dont wear panties, OR manscape) 

[JKane]

On 4/11/2018 at 10:33 PM, boiworship said:

Unfortunately, there was underage pimping going on with CL and BP and that was the genesis of this new law. I know folks prominent in NGOs dealing with recovering sex workers, so I can state with certainty, whether it will be believed by some or not.

 

On 4/11/2018 at 11:25 PM, AdamSmith said:

In the U.S.?

I swam in those waters, and never encountered an underage provider. (And I know fairly well the warning lights.)

 

 

Despite everybody assuming us gay guys are horribly depraved, it was mostly on the W4M side.  Basically pimps moved off the street and onto CL and especially BP with all the same abuses.  When it was easier to con some 16 year old into working for them and giving all she made they had no qualms about doing so, whether they had her working the corner or the hyperlink.  Then there were also the massage parlors, which would also sometimes 'employ' a 15-16 year old trafficking victim and happen to also advertise on CL/BP...  

That said, despite all the mania, I don't think they particularly advertised underage as a feature, knowing the attention it could get; nor were they pimping little girls who obviously looked younger than 18 in the pictures, from what I saw every time it made the news.  Of course there were occasional scumbag exceptions but those were usually relations to the young girls and also easy targets for law enforcement.  This just pushes that shit deep into the darkweb where enforcement is much harder.  

On our M4M sections we just had guys making money for themselves, and if we thought they looked young or the alluded to being underage I personally ran the other way (clicking report on their post as I went), so it was very rare.  And yet here we all are, tarred with the same brush.  

I wonder if there's M4M escorting sites spinning up in the darkweb as we speak?  Problem is the technical barrier to entry, if I haven't even bothered to learn how it's not like a guy who needs money for his rent, next meal. or fix will, especially when he can't do it from his phone.  I guess that does re-create the position for an escort service/pimp...  

[Riobard]

JKane, you make extremely insightful points.

[boiworship]

I would stay far, far away from the Dark Web. Chilling.

[JKane]

Happened to cruise SMB a couple of times during the day this weekend, as well as Lankershim.  Didn't see guys out working (yet), did see a couple transvestites.  

Hired a dancer with an amazing body off of Grindr though...