Tristan Baldwin versus Legendary Dave!

[MsAnn]

But Monte Cristo, without rising, and leaning forward in his chair, merely stretched out his arm and, taking the damp, crushed glove from the clinched hand of the young man, "Sir," said he in a solemn tone, "I consider your glove thrown, and will return it to you wrapped around a bullet. Now leave me or I will summon my servants to throw you out at the door."

[Guest Larstrup]

4 hours ago, RockHardNYC said:

Your membership account at Daddy's appears to be reinstated. I didn't calculate the clock, but it seems your Time-Out did not last very long. Is it fair to say your "nuclear" reaction was an over-reaction?

Daddy has appeared to forgive you. Are you not ready yet to forgive him?

Not sure what you're basing your claim with here; as Adam Smith is not a searchable member profile over there. Which means his account continues to be deactivated. Sure you can search for his past posts by name, and view those results, but as far as his account being reactivated, I think that is incorrect. Member names which are active will always appear in a suggestive name drop down box while imputing their member names. Adam Smith's does not.

[RockHardNYC]

25 minutes ago, Larstrup said:

Which means his account continues to be deactivated.

Oops, never mind. My bad and my apologies.

In days past, the heading under the username used to indicate a Time-Out or Retired status when someone was put on hold. The under-the-weather owner has updated the software so many times, I may have lost track.

Larstrup, thanks for the heads-up.

[RockHardNYC]

40 minutes ago, Larstrup said:

Member names which are active will always appear in a suggestive name drop down box while imputing their member names.

Haven't tried to log-in in years or search for a username. Do not know the current features of the software. Even in years past, I never spent much time trying to learn the UI. Never cared enough. Never spent that much time there.

[Guest Larstrup]

36 minutes ago, RockHardNYC said:

Oops, never mind. My bad and my apologies.

 

And so yet one again, another verbose, self-aggrandizing post goes for not. 

 

Perhaps your own fixation with Adam Smith’s now resolved relationship ( intellectually at least) with Daddy,  is actually in reflection, one which you have yet to achieve or recover from yourself. 

 

 

 

 

[Guest Larstrup]

32 minutes ago, RockHardNYC said:

 Even in years past, I never spent much time trying to learn the UI. Never cared enough. Never spent that much time there.

 Your past multiple posts here, where you arrogantly regaled us all with your multiple personal conversations with Daddy, in your efforts  to create a better daddy’s review site and forum, Suggest this is at best, not necessarily true, and at worst, patently false. 

[Latbear4blk]

I think I have missed a to o episodes of this soap opera. Based on what I have seen in my short tenure in this place, I cannot understand this animosity.

[AdamSmith]

@RockHard an hour ago sent me a very sweet conciliatory PM. All is good.

Friends are going to argue with each other and call each other out on this or that. Sometimes it will have a strong basis in reality; other times it will arise from a simple misunderstanding of some underlying fact.

Dinna fret! We are all friends here.

And, I think, durable friends.

Unlike (just can't resist  ) at some other foraminifera.

[AdamSmith]

4 hours ago, MsAnn said:

Never surrender, never retreat...A.S.

“Learning does not make one learned: there are those who have knowledge and those who have understanding. The first requires memory and the second philosophy.”
― Alexandre Dumas, The Count of Monte Cristo

One is, of course, always living five or eight real lives.

In Parallel.

As it were.

[That scene is not actually in Parallel Time, but close enough.]

 

[Guest Larstrup]

6 hours ago, RockHardNYC said:

Instead of stupid, brain-dead animated gifs and boring YouTube clips aimed to make an old-man-in-dementia smile, I offer a few rhetorical questions to warm the bitter, winter cold:

In retrospect, was going nuclear necessary? Did it do any good for anyone? Did something important change for the better?

Your membership account at Daddy's appears to be reinstated. I didn't calculate the clock, but it seems your Time-Out did not last very long. Is it fair to say your "nuclear" reaction was an over-reaction?

Daddy has appeared to forgive you. Are you not ready yet to forgive him?

Why don't you return? Clearly, just like others, you enjoyed the camaraderie of like-minded men in an anonymous environment. You seem to have a good-sized number of readers there who value your contributions. Why deny them the pleasure of your company and your special wit? Wouldn't you rather have a larger audience for your brilliance? After all, you're no stupid, blind-bitch, loud-mouthed TROLL. On top of that, you're a handsome, youngish man, with a full head of gorgeous hair.

You're not a bald, fat, obnoxious New York jewish princess, a retired flunky cosmetologist from SuperCuts (owned by that flunky corporation REGIS), with scabby knees and lord knows what else, since the TROLL clearly enjoys scouring the floors at sex parties, looking for any cock, no matter where it's been, to stuff and shove into her big, fat mouth, because she doesn't know the meaning of E.N.O.U.G.H.

If guys could see what I've seen, many would realize you're quite the catch, AdamSmith. You never know who you're going to meet on a populated forum board. Why cut yourself out when you don't have to?

I only ask these rhetorical questions because it's cold and snowy outside. I also have plenty of experience in the Daddy/banning department. I lost count, but B banned me at least three times for a year each. A year to the date and time! Imagine that nuclear precision. Remarkably, he allowed me to return after each year was up. I've never been sure what to say about that, except, maybe, thank you?

Now don't get me wrong, I served the guy a lot of shit. One could say I learned how to push all the right buttons. I was overly hell-bent on making changes to his piss-poor moderation style. And there was that certain failed escort-with-a-vendetta/God complex who fed at the trough of my username eradication. In some righteous fights, there are casualties.

Granted, my reasons for participating may be different than yours and others. I certainly don't need to be an attention whore, even though I know how to play one on stage and screen.

I've always been honest about how I came to Daddy:

1. To save Benjamin Nicholas from self and the bitter, evil wolves.
2. To study the financial opportunities in owning and running an escort review site.

Luckily for me, I had no belonging agenda. I wasn't looking for new friends, dates, or . I admit, the first ban got my goat, and I did react to it in private email. But when Daddy decided to go all nuclear on me, I didn't feel it was necessary to return equal fire, since any personal investment was truly nowhere near my heart.

It is amazing to me that some stupid TROLL keeps insisting that banishment from Daddy's causes heartache, bitterness, and jealousy. Stupid doesn't really get more stupid than this. All you have to do to end your banishment: create a new username/account. So many people have done this through the years. There is absolutely no need to whine about being banned or take it personally. You are not required to change your writing voice or pretend you are someone else. As far as I know, your IP is not blocked. Even if the IP poses a problem, there are ways around that, if you have half a brain.

I know you didn't ask for my advice, and I'm not offering any. However, if I were you Adam, I would consider a comeback. I know a few guys who would welcome you with open arms. And I've heard you give good hugs.

With love...

I had no intention of responding to anything in this thread — before this.

The stench of your arrogance, self-importance, privileged self-righteousness, and utter contempt for those of us who post here, and how we choose to express ourselves here, pushed me over the edge.

 Your conciliatory PM to Adam Smith, may have well been accepted,  as noted above by AS ; but never think for a moment, that your arrogance and your self-righteousness was lost on any one of the other members here who were also impacted and negatively affected by it.

[Guest jimboivyo]

2 minutes ago, Larstrup said:

I had no intention of responding to anything in this thread — before this.

The stench of your arrogance, self-importance, privileged self-righteousness, and utter contempt for those of us who post here, and how we choose to express ourselves here, pushed me over the edge.

 Your conciliatory PM to Adam Smith, may have well been accepted,  as noted above by AS ; but never think for a moment, that your arrogance and your self-righteousness was lost on any one of the members here who were also impacted and affected by it, towards them as well.

 

 

 

 

Dear jesus you're still blathering about this?

 

 

[AdamSmith]

11 minutes ago, Larstrup said:

I had no intention of responding to anything in this thread — before this.

The stench of your arrogance, self-importance, privileged self-righteousness, and utter contempt for those of us who post here, and how we choose to express ourselves here, pushed me over the edge.

 Your conciliatory PM to Adam Smith, may have well been accepted,  as noted above by AS ; but never think for a moment, that your arrogance and your self-righteousness was lost on any one of the members here who were also impacted and affected by it, by them as well.

Your heart is great. But RH and I (and many others!  ) have some of what is politely called history. 

We'll all be all right.

[MsAnn]

37 minutes ago, AdamSmith said:

 

Friends are going to argue with each other and call each other out on this or that. Sometimes it will have a strong basis in reality; other times it will arise from a simple misunderstanding of some underlying fact.

 

 

Perhaps...but that would depend on ones definition of "friend".

[Guest Larstrup]

25 minutes ago, AdamSmith said:

Your heart is great. But RH and I (and many others!  ) have some of what is politely called history. 

We'll all be all right.

Surprisingly, I don't really care about you and Rockhard's personal history. His stench of arrogance, repetitive statements of self-importance and privileged self-righteousness here, has never been anything less than an assault upon how members here choose to communicate and express themselves.

Never. Ever.

Of course! we here, and everyone else, elsewhere, will be alright. But it won't be because of Rockhard's presence here, or because of his lack of presence here either.

"Many other's" may feel differently.

Carrying Rockhard's water for him is a choice of personal conscience.

 

[Latbear4blk]

Should I feel bad? I think @RockHardNYC is actually interesting and entertaining. I am too lazy to research his history here.

[AdamSmith]

18 minutes ago, Larstrup said:

Surprisingly, I don't really care about you and Rockhard's personal history. His stench of arrogance, repetitive statements of self-importance and privileged self-righteousness here, has never been anything less than an assault upon how members here choose to communicate and express themselves.

Never. Ever.

Of course! we here, and everyone else, elsewhere, will be alright. But it won't be because of Rockhard's presence here, or because of his lack of presence here either.

"Many other's" may feel differently.

Carrying Rockhard's water for him is a choice of personal conscience.

 

All I can say is, I like him a lot.

[AdamSmith]

35 minutes ago, MsAnn said:

Perhaps...but that would depend on ones definition of "friend".

Yes.

[RockHardNYC]

3 hours ago, Larstrup said:

Your past multiple posts here, where you arrogantly regaled us all with your multiple personal conversations with Daddy, in your efforts  to create a better daddy’s review site and forum, Suggest this is at best, not necessarily true, and at worst, patently false.

Yo bitch, sounds like you're calling me a liar.

"Multiple personal conversations with Daddy" does not add up to 719 posts here or 2000+ elsewhere. I haven't been on Daddy's board since 2013, and it took Daddy a long time to change and tweak his software program. I'm not current with his new software, and Steven Draker and I are still listed as "Time Out." One would think the old, under-the-weather man would be consistent.

Not a word of what I wrote was false, bitch.

1 hour ago, Larstrup said:

but never think for a moment, that your arrogance and your self-righteousness was lost on any one of the other members here who were also impacted and negatively affected by it.

Do you mean the four others who post here, the two trolls, and JD? How about a suck on this pacifier, you big baby.

If something I wrote impacted you negatively, how about not reading my posts in the future. Now go cry to mommy.

[RockHardNYC]

40 minutes ago, Larstrup said:

Carrying Rockhard's water for him is a choice of personal conscience.

LOL! Please, keep 'em coming.

[RockHardNYC]

36 minutes ago, Latbear4blk said:

I am too lazy to research his history here.

Don't bother. There isn't much.

[Latbear4blk]

Again, I do not know the history here, so I am going to guess. Please, no one get offended because I am not sharing this with certainty. Just brainstorming.

Some of the things that are being asserted in this thread about @RockHardNYC, have also been aimed to @AdamSmith. Are they arrogant? Well, I do not know THEM, but their characters here. The answer is Hell yes, they are. So far I have not yet been targeted by RHNYC, but I have suffered in the past being talked down by AS. We already talked about this Adam, no need to apologize again.

Does that bother me? Some times, but rarely. I know they are arrogant, no one is perfect. I also know they are bright, and I enjoy their posts most times.

As I said, I do not know RHNYC history here, but I do know AS history in Daddy's. Over there, most times when he was accused of being arrogant, the accuser lacked of self esteem and confidence, and always lacked of sense of humor.

Being arrogant is one of their many defects. I have my own flaws. 

[RockHardNYC]

43 minutes ago, Larstrup said:

"Many other's" may feel differently.

Only one or two. I never did care what an asshole thinks of me.

[Guest Larstrup]

6 minutes ago, RockHardNYC said:

Yo bitch, sounds like you're calling me a liar.

"Multiple personal conversations with Daddy" does not add up to 719 posts here or 2000+ elsewhere. I haven't been on Daddy's board since 2013, and it took Daddy a long time to change and tweak his software program. I'm not current with his new software, and Steven Draker and I are still listed as "Time Out." One would think the old, under-the-weather man would be consistent.

Not a word of what I wrote was false, bitch.

Do you mean the four others who post here, the two trolls, and JD? How about a suck on this pacifier, you big baby.

If something I wrote impacted you negatively, how about not reading my posts in the future. Now go cry to mommy.

The defense, rests. 

[RockHardNYC]

9 minutes ago, Latbear4blk said:

The answer is Hell yes, they are.

Sounds like you're judging two people you don't know. Well that's on your personal conscience. I got a pail of water if you need it.

AdamSmith is correct. We have history, and lots of it. I'm absolutely confident he understood my intent. Beyond that, no other opinion matters to me. Feel free to talk amongst yourselves, or talk to yourselves, which is usually the case here.

[RockHardNYC]

3 hours ago, Larstrup said:

Perhaps your own fixation with Adam Smith’s now resolved relationship ( intellectually at least) with Daddy,  is actually in reflection, one which you have yet to achieve or recover from yourself.

LOL! I missed this one. Gurl, what you be smokin'?