Members EscortJamahl Posted January 19, 2017 Members Share Posted January 19, 2017 So Birmingham Alabama has 2 rentmen escorts. New York has a whopping 642. Far exceeding the amount rentboy ever held (though I think that may include traveling escorts, or guys like myself who just place standing travel ads in the area). Likewise, there's 12 escorts in Milwaukee, 142 in Chicago. 6 escorts in Raliegh, NC. 194 in San Francisco. Why do such relatively large cities lag behind other relatively large cities? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tanman4u Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 Well I thought a little simple math could explain it but the didn't work out too well. Based on 2013 #'s SFO Population = 837,442 divided by 194 escorts = 4,316 per escort NYC Population = 8.404M divided by 642 escorts = 13,093 per escort CHI Population = 2.719M divided by 142 escorts = 19,147 per escort MKE Population = 594,833 divided by 12 escorts = 49,569 per escort RDU Population = 431,746 divided by 6 escorts = 71,957 per escort BHM Population = 212,113 divided by 2 escorts = 106,056 per escort So what can we learn from this? It would seem like Birmingham would be a pretty good place to be an escort and San Francisco not so much. It would seem like San Francisco would be a better place to be a client. It seems like I have waaaay too much time on my hands and need to schedule a trip to SFO sometime soon......or perhaps Orlando ;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Scorpio Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 2 hours ago, tanman4u said: Well I thought a little simple math could explain it but the didn't work out too well. Based on 2013 #'s SFO Population = 837,442 divided by 194 escorts = 4,316 per escort NYC Population = 8.404M divided by 642 escorts = 13,093 per escort CHI Population = 2.719M divided by 142 escorts = 19,147 per escort MKE Population = 594,833 divided by 12 escorts = 49,569 per escort RDU Population = 431,746 divided by 6 escorts = 71,957 per escort BHM Population = 212,113 divided by 2 escorts = 106,056 per escort So what can we learn from this? It would seem like Birmingham would be a pretty good place to be an escort and San Francisco not so much. It would seem like San Francisco would be a better place to be a client. It seems like I have waaaay too much time on my hands and need to schedule a trip to SFO sometime soon......or perhaps Orlando ;-) Actually, math is part of the answer to making it comparable. But what you need to do is Common Size the data, whereby you divide the number of escorts in a city by its population to give you a percentage. When rounded to the nearest hundreth, the results is that 0.001% to 0.007% of the population in a given city are available as male escorts for men. The exception is SFO at 0.023%, which may indicate the other influence - DEMAND. Different localities are going to have different demands for escorts, which will have an effect on SUPPLY. Econ 101 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest xLeviStonex Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 Not only do we lack escorts in HOU,TX but the quality of escort is atrocious. $60/hr or even trade services for drugs.WTF. Dude I'm trying to make money and take care of my son. It's jacking up the game.Not many want a quality escort they just want to get them and be done,I understand,but why risk the chance on getting a f-ed up person or being made known and exposed to whom ever,or even going to jail because they want to be cheap. smh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cornelius Posted January 29, 2017 Share Posted January 29, 2017 On 1/26/2017 at 2:11 PM, xLeviStonex said: Not only do we lack escorts in HOU,TX but the quality of escort is atrocious. $60/hr or even trade services for drugs.WTF. Dude I'm trying to make money and take care of my son. It's jacking up the game.Not many want a quality escort they just want to get them and be done,I understand,but why risk the chance on getting a f-ed up person or being made known and exposed to whom ever,or even going to jail because they want to be cheap. smh. I've always wondered this myself. I offered 100$ for an hour once. Which in my book is EXTREMELY cheap. I had a lot of interest but as soon as people seen the price they scurried away saying that my price was "too steep". It just scares me that people honestly think that is a lot of money for something so personal. These are the same guys that visit glory holes I imagine, or they have never looked into hiring an escort. Not surprising being in such a "country" state like Idaho Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
