Daddy Needs An Attorney in Atlanta

[Guest Larstrup]

So Daddy over at the other site has posted the need for an attorney (civil) in Atlanta. One can only speculate, but since he's chosen to make it public, I suspect the mental health issues of an unstable escort who has made past threats over here might be the source of this procurement. 

http://www.message-forum.net/threads/daddy-needs-a-referral.117224/

[Suckrates]

46 minutes ago, Larstrup said:

So Daddy over at the other site has posted the need for an attorney (civil) in Atlanta. One can only speculate, but since he's chosen to make it public, I suspect the mental health issues of an unstable escort who has made past threats over here might be the source of this procurement. 

http://www.message-forum.net/threads/daddy-needs-a-referral.117224/

 

And THAT escort who shall remain nameless (but we all know who she is)  has also made the request for legal representation...

Some people just cant let shit go....   Looks like Alexis Carrington Colby and Crystal Carrington will be facing off in court.  I wonder WHO will win the wig pulling ?   I say "Lock em BOTH up" !   What can be better than hot Thug prison sex ?  

 

[BigK]

Such drama

[Suckrates]

 

Maybe the two of them will face off like THIS :

 

 

 

[TotallyOz]

Who is Guy Falwks? What happened to Deej?

[Guest Scorpio]

4 minutes ago, TotallyOz said:

Who is Guy Falwks? What happened to Deej?

I took a break from both boards for about  7 months.  At some point during that time "Daddy" changed his message board handle to "Guy Fawkes". deej is still around

[AdamSmith]

The change to Guy Fawkes happened shortly after the Rentboy legal takedown.

[TotallyOz]

What change a name from Daddy?  Oh well, I guess I am out of the loop. So, why does he say Daddy needs help if his name is now Guy?  Should it not be Guy needs help?

[AdamSmith]

48 minutes ago, TotallyOz said:

What change a name from Daddy?  Oh well, I guess I am out of the loop. So, why does he say Daddy needs help if his name is now Guy?  Should it not be Guy needs help?

Not quite clear how he intends the two identities to relate, but he has made no secret that he is Daddy and he now posts as Guy Fawkes.

[Guest Larstrup]

6 hours ago, Suckrates said:

 

Maybe the two of them will face off like THIS :

 

 

 

Or,

6 hours ago, Suckrates said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Lucky]

I sure hope that the details of this lawsuit don't spill over into this forum as I simply couldn't care less. If they are going to use the courts to resolve a dispute, we don't need to do it here.

[Suckrates]

9 hours ago, AdamSmith said:

The change to Guy Fawkes happened shortly after the Rentboy legal takedown.

 

I thought Daddy changed his name to Mr Fawkes after his EOY meltdown ?  Just before Steven Kessler held the telethon to get members to pay a monthly "site sustenance" fee....

[Suckrates]

2 hours ago, Lucky said:

I sure hope that the details of this lawsuit don't spill over into this forum as I simply couldn't care less. If they are going to use the courts to resolve a dispute, we don't need to do it here.

I hope they do, as I am once again Banned from Daddy's so am not able to put my 2 cents worth in there.   Inquiring mind here !

[MsGuy]

Jesus Frog, Sucky, what the hell did you do this time?

Inquiring minds want to know.

[Guest JDDanielsxxx]

2 minutes ago, MsGuy said:

Jesus Frog, Sucky, what the hell did you do this time?

Inquiring minds want to know.

Exactly!!!

Not that it matters, but I'm curious as well as to why and how long? Just came from back from being banned, and now banned again. What happened this time?

[Guest Larstrup]

[Suckrates]

7 minutes ago, MsGuy said:

Jesus Frog, Sucky, what the hell did you do this time?

Inquiring minds want to know.

I posted shirtless pics of the hot son of a Real Housewife of New Jersey, and mentioned that he was 17 years old.  His name is Frankie Catania, and he's somewhat of a celebrity.  The gestapo said I was in TOS violation of posting pics of minors, eventhough the kid was clothed below the waist.  It was a bullshit charge they used to get rid of me as those mods are still holding their grudge against me from years ago.   I most likely WONT go back when the ban is lifted...  The site is pretty much dead now as everyone there is a puppet, and afraid to post anything the least bit interesting or controversial.

[AdamSmith]

1 hour ago, Suckrates said:

I thought Daddy changed his name to Mr Fawkes after his EOY meltdown ?  Just before Steven Kessler held the telethon to get members to pay a monthly "site sustenance" fee....

Was that what it was? The soap-opera intrigue is hard to keep up with.

[Guest Larstrup]

31 minutes ago, Suckrates said:

afraid to post anything the least bit interesting or controversial.

Suckrates, while interesting & controversial will always be personally subjective; in an open and welcoming forum society they should never be silenced. At least not without fore-warning. As an example of your point I offer this thread:

http://www.message-forum.net/threads/daddy-needs-a-referral.117224/

The above thread currently has 294 views. Yet only one guy (a funguy!)  has had the courage and confidence to respond to it even after 294 views. That's community fear in my mind. That thread was placed on that forum by the owner to intimidate the person for whom it was meant. I quickly picked up on the drama and posted "this" thread here because I believed some might want, but would fear, responding. I also love others people's drama as long as it remains unfiltered. 

Subsequently, the target of that post quickly posted over here in retaliation to that post so that he didn't feel weak and out of control of which he still is. These people are trying to publicly intimate each other in lieu of settling their differences privately and this puts everyone on edge.

My point is, suckrates, you're a good guy with a rough edge. If those people over there cant handle it then it's perhaps better for you that you're not there. But it's great that you are here.

 

[citylaw1]

1 hour ago, Suckrates said:

I .   I most likely WONT go back when the ban is lifted...  The site is pretty much dead now as everyone there is a puppet, and afraid to post anything the least bit interesting or controversial.

1

Why did you ever go back?  I never did.  I look at the reviews, but it's the same 10 guys reviewed every day, and I question the validity. 

[citylaw1]

22 hours ago, Suckrates said:

 

And THAT escort who shall remain nameless (but we all know who she is)  has also made the request for legal representation...

 

 

 

Who is the escort?  I'm very much out of the loop.  My endless search for the perfect twink has taken nearly all of my time - and money. 

[Guest JDDanielsxxx]

3 hours ago, Suckrates said:

Just before Steven Kessler held the telethon to get members to pay a monthly "site sustenance" fee....

Yeah, let's talk about that for a minute.

Here it was I was literally beheaded on that site for asking my clients or people I have seen in the past in one form or another that I knew to vote for me for EOY, but this man is praised asking for money for Daddy's website that's supposedly the top review site in the world. If it's the TOP review site in the world why would Daddy need someone to pledge for him to keep the site up and running after members have been long standing for free on there since the Hoo-boy days?

It's amazing and hypocritical to me how I didn't ask for money, but for votes to win an award, and got shitted on, but this man ask for money and he's a saint literally. Wow. Unbelievable.

[Suckrates]

1 hour ago, Larstrup said:

Suckrates, while interesting & controversial will always be personally subjective; in an open and welcoming forum society they should never be silenced. At least not without fore-warning. As an example of your point I offer this thread:

http://www.message-forum.net/threads/daddy-needs-a-referral.117224/

The above thread currently has 294 views. Yet only one guy (a funguy!)  has had the courage and confidence to respond to it even after 294 views. That's community fear in my mind. That thread was placed on that forum by the owner to intimidate the person for whom it was meant. I quickly picked up on the drama and posted "this" thread here because I believed some might want, but would fear, responding. I also love others people's drama as long as it remains unfiltered. 

Subsequently, the target of that post quickly posted over here in retaliation to that post so that he didn't feel weak and out of control of which he still is. These people are trying to publicly intimate each other in lieu of settling their differences privately and this puts everyone on edge.

My point is, suckrates, you're a good guy with a rough edge. If those people over there cant handle it then it's perhaps better for you that you're not there. But it's great that you are here.

 

I wholeheartedly agree.  Between the censorship AND the intimidation, it hardly seems like a place anyone would want to hang out.  Why would they NOT allow you to openly show pics of ERECT cocks when they are so readily available all over the web?. I chose to go back ONLY because the site got alot of traffic, and I knew my posts would be seen and heard by many, eventhough my points of view and opinions were not popular with the masses.  Or perhaps they WERE, and the members were afraid to say so out of fear that it would put them on Daddy's radar since Daddy and his sidekicks were always watching ME... And there are a few members over there that seem to be working for the mgt, as they routinely put me in my place when I gave my views on a few touchy subjects.  I thought there were a few guys there that COULD be trusted, but I quickly found out otherwise... This is a good, easy, relaxed place to be...I only wish that the traffic it DOES HAVE would be a bit more "verbal".... 

[Guest Larstrup]

16 hours ago, Suckrates said:

 

Maybe the two of them will face off like THIS :

 

 

 

I'm actually jacking off right now looking at this gif. Had they been spitting on each other....no jacking would have  been required. 

[Guest JDDanielsxxx]

5 hours ago, Suckrates said:

I wholeheartedly agree.  Between the censorship AND the intimidation, it hardly seems like a place anyone would want to hang out.  Why would they NOT allow you to openly show pics of ERECT cocks when they are so readily available all over the web?. I chose to go back ONLY because the site got alot of traffic, and I knew my posts would be seen and heard by many, eventhough my points of view and opinions were not popular with the masses.  Or perhaps they WERE, and the members were afraid to say so out of fear that it would put them on Daddy's radar since Daddy and his sidekicks were always watching ME... And there are a few members over there that seem to be working for the mgt, as they routinely put me in my place when I gave my views on a few touchy subjects.  I thought there were a few guys there that COULD be trusted, but I quickly found out otherwise... This is a good, easy, relaxed place to be...I only wish that the traffic it DOES HAVE would be a bit more "verbal".... 

Welcome to the Club, man.

Seems like you got a good dose of what some of the rest of us on that site have experienced. Never fails it seems when it comes to people bullying others. :(.