AdamSmith Posted June 26, 2015 Posted June 26, 2015 A 30,000-pound bunker buster. Largest non-nuclear weapon ever: https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/30-000-pound-bomb-could-204800527.html If somebody is going to have one, suppose I'm glad it's us. For now. Quote
Members RA1 Posted June 27, 2015 Members Posted June 27, 2015 Did you skip over the T-12 Cloud Maker? Regardless of this and other weapons, the will to use them is definitive. Best regards, RA1 AdamSmith 1 Quote
AdamSmith Posted June 27, 2015 Author Posted June 27, 2015 Also to know when simply to hold them in readiness. RA1 and lookin 2 Quote
Members RA1 Posted June 27, 2015 Members Posted June 27, 2015 I believe that is a distinction without a difference. Best regards, RA1 Quote
AdamSmith Posted June 27, 2015 Author Posted June 27, 2015 I believe that is a distinction without a difference. Well... One could argue there was quite a difference indeed between the cost-effectiveness of Gulf I under George H.W. and Powell, and that of Gulf II. Quote
Members RA1 Posted June 28, 2015 Members Posted June 28, 2015 Personally I prefer Shell. Best regards, RA1 AdamSmith 1 Quote
