Guest callipygian Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 You're a fornicating distal orifice of the alimentary canal! http://www.message-forum.net/showthread.php?102921-MELLOW-or-GRUMPY-What-Kind-of-Old-Man-Are-YOU-Going-to-Be&p=946960#post946960 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamSmith Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 I will disclose a state secret: lookin is actually P.G. Wodehouse. lookin 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MsGuy Posted February 12, 2015 Members Share Posted February 12, 2015 FBI storms AdamSmith's residence. US attorney vows swift justice. Notorious porn master Oz currently believed to be resisting records subpoena barricaded behind a wall of ferociously loyal call boys. AdamSmith 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Griffin Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 the only thing remotely funny about this post is the desperate and unoriginal light it casts upon you for stealing it from another websites forum. no wonder so few post here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MsAnn Posted February 12, 2015 Members Share Posted February 12, 2015 the only thing remotely funny about this post is the desperate and unoriginal light it casts upon you for stealing it from another websites forum. no wonder so few post here. Hmmmm, two posts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamSmith Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 these adolesant type posts from grown men is an indication that you should not be engaging other men for sex. if you cant afford something move on and find something else to do with your time. the only thing remotely funny about this post is the desperate and unoriginal light it casts upon you for stealing it from another websites forum. no wonder so few post here. Nothing like a string of upbeat, constructive posts to prove one's commitment to bettering a forum. As callipygian explicitly posted a hyperlink back to the source location where lookin originally made his post, your calling it 'stealing' is hard to interpret as other than deliberate hatefulness on your part. MsAnn and mvan1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamSmith Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 no wonder so few post here. P.S. Whose payroll are you on? MsAnn 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Griffin Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 such a conspiracy theorist. not all of us rely upon other peoples wealth to live. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MsAnn Posted February 12, 2015 Members Share Posted February 12, 2015 P.S. Whose payroll are you on? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamSmith Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 Let me put it another way. Where does your animosity toward this site come from? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MsAnn Posted February 12, 2015 Members Share Posted February 12, 2015 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest callipygian Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 the only thing remotely funny about this post is the desperate and unoriginal light it casts upon you for stealing it from another websites forum. no wonder so few post here. Now I wish I hadn't used this one before. Twice! hehehe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members jgoo Posted February 12, 2015 Members Share Posted February 12, 2015 If there is an issue someone has with this site I hope they would be able to explicitly spell it out, for the purpose of either trying to explain why they don't participate or speculate as to why others may not, with some constructive intention of making it a more suitable and welcoming place. This is certainly not the intent of this specific thread to open that discussion, but nevertheless it is one worthy of exploring and perhaps something could be learned along the way. AdamSmith 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Suckrates Posted February 12, 2015 Members Share Posted February 12, 2015 Is DrakerAss back ?????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MsAnn Posted February 13, 2015 Members Share Posted February 13, 2015 Is DrakerAss back ?????? No, not the Draker, but Jimboi BN tried coming in the back door. Some prefer diplomacy, I like the direct approach. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Suckrates Posted February 13, 2015 Members Share Posted February 13, 2015 No, not the Draker, but Jimboi BN tried coming in the back door. Some prefer diplomacy, I like the direct approach. Why cant these Queens just evaporate into the air..... They are like Hemorrhoids, you just cant get rid of them . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamSmith Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members jgoo Posted February 13, 2015 Members Share Posted February 13, 2015 Why cant these Queens just evaporate into the air..... They are like Hemorrhoids, you just cant get rid of them . Don't they have the right (if we are in fact given rights on this site) to participate? Why the need to get rid of anyone? I am not trying to be argumentative, and I certainly don't want to hijack this thread, but it seems to me that there is some predisposition by some against some members and their participation. I truly would like to understand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest callipygian Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 Lucky? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MsAnn Posted February 13, 2015 Members Share Posted February 13, 2015 Lucky? No my dear, it's classic Jimboi BN stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Suckrates Posted February 13, 2015 Members Share Posted February 13, 2015 Don't they have the right (if we are in fact given rights on this site) to participate? Why the need to get rid of anyone? I am not trying to be argumentative, and I certainly don't want to hijack this thread, but it seems to me that there is some predisposition by some against some members and their participation. I truly would like to understand. Participation should be positive, or at least 50/50. When a members only contributions are criticisms, without bringing anything else to the table, they are not here to be a part of this community... They are here to cause trouble, insult and spread a personal agenda. It doesnt take a genius to know it aint rocket science. Its a troublemaker ! Do they have a right ? FUCK NO !!! MsAnn 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MsAnn Posted February 13, 2015 Members Share Posted February 13, 2015 Maybe he'll get mad and call the State Attorney General Consumer Protection Division. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members jgoo Posted February 13, 2015 Members Share Posted February 13, 2015 Seems to be almost a default position by several people to say someone is using a pseudonym rather than making some effort to discuss the point being raised. I've noticed that in several instances and while I have no idea if in fact that may be the case with others, I do think it becomes rather tiresome when it is raised without any basis or grounding in fact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members jgoo Posted February 13, 2015 Members Share Posted February 13, 2015 Participation should be positive, or at least 50/50. When a members only contributions are criticisms, without bringing anything else to the table, they are not here to be a part of this community... They are here to cause trouble, insult and spread a personal agenda. It doesnt take a genius to know it aint rocket science. Its a troublemaker ! Do they have a right ? FUCK NO !!! There is no standard, from what I can tell, about what participation should be or not should be. Perhaps Oz could clarify that issue for us. And I am not sure who can really judge what is positive or negative. If I agree with someone then perhaps that is perceived as positive but if I disagree then negative. Does that necessarily mean the views are not valid? As the pope says....who am I to judge? And while I may sense some posters and members are very negative, I don't feel it negates their "right" to participate in any way they see fit. I have seen plenty of insults back and forth so I can't say that many members can take the high road on that basis. Sure, some have said that they only do it when they have been insulted first, but the fact remains that it is something that they have done. One perosn's troublemaker is another person's though provoker....comes from one's own bias and perspective. Do they have a right? Yes they do, until the owner of this site whose playground it is says they don't. I certainly can't make that decision and I don't feel any other member has that right to make the decision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest callipygian Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 Another happy thread hits the crapper. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
