Nominations for the First Annual Boytoy Awards

[Guest lurkerspeaks]

Since turnout has been so low, i will keep nominations open until 6pm PST monday sept. 15

[AdamSmith]

Everybody...

[AdamSmith]

[AdamSmith]

[RA1]

I wish I understood this but I do not. Sorry to not participate.

Best regards,

RA1

[Suckrates]

While I think lurkers CONCEPT is cute and clever, I can understand low participation for the following reason:

some of the categories can be interpreted as having a "negative" connotation. As we are a close knit group, perhaps some members dont feel comfortable with some of those categories, and singling out people for negative things, eventhough the nominations are anonymous.

And while I anxiously await to see which members will have their Sally Field moment and squeal "You like ME, you really, really like ME", I also cant wait to see how the winners in the "negative" categories will react (where I Do expect to see MYSELF) !

Like the Hookie Awards, which are given for the BEST in EVERY category, lurkers' awards are more like 1/2 Hookie and 1/2 Razzie, and I think the Razzie part killed the interest. Obviously just MY opinion though. I wish lurker GOOD LUCK with the extended time frame.

Just remember, We are ALL winners...........

[AdamSmith]

[lookin]

While I think lurkers CONCEPT is cute and clever, I can understand low participation for the following reason:

some of the categories can be interpreted as having a "negative" connotation. As we are a close knit group, perhaps some members dont feel comfortable with some of those categories, and singling out people for negative things, eventhough the nominations are anonymous.

And while I anxiously await to see which members will have their Sally Field moment and squeal "You like ME, you really, really like ME", I also cant wait to see how the winners in the "negative" categories will react (where I Do expect to see MYSELF) !

Like the Hookie Awards, which are given for the BEST in EVERY category, lurkers' awards are more like 1/2 Hookie and 1/2 Razzie, and I think the Razzie part killed the interest. Obviously just MY opinion though. I wish lurker GOOD LUCK with the extended time frame.

Just remember, We are ALL winners...........

Very well said!

I didn't vote in the negative categories (6, 8, 9) which Lurker said was OK. And I had a couple of nominations in most of the other categories, which he also said was OK. Even then, I don't think my votes reflect all the different views I hold throughout the years.

I trust Lurker though and I'm sure if he thinks the results would do any harm, he'll manage to lose the ballot box on the way to the convention.

[AdamSmith]

I found a simple solution. I nominated MYSELF for the negative category.

[Suckrates]

I found a simple solution. I nominated MYSELF for the negative category.

Well, That only makes sense.... If I were a votin man, I'd nominate you for those categories TOO !

[Suckrates]

In the spirit of the Beloved Joan Rivers, the following categories should have been included:

- Biggest Asshole

- He's a Douche, but I like him

- Biggest Loudmouth

- He's just TACKY

- Most Dubious thread Hijacker

- He Must be a FAKE !

- Poster of the Most "Who the Fuck Cares" topics"

- Miss CUNTY

And the Coveted "OH, NOT HIM AGAIN" HUMANITARIAN AWARD

Remember Boys, it's an HONOR just to be Nominated !

[Suckrates]

In the spirit of the Beloved Joan Rivers, the following categories should have been included:

- Biggest Asshole

- He's a Douche, but I like him

- Biggest Loudmouth

- He's just TACKY

- Most Dubious thread Hijacker

- He Must be a FAKE !

- Poster of the Most "Who the Fuck Cares" topics"

- Miss CUNTY

And the Coveted "OH, NOT HIM AGAIN" HUMANITARIAN AWARD

Remember Boys, it's an HONOR just to be Nominated !

HE likes it, he really, really Likes it !