The Daddy Dummies

[TotallyOz]

I will be a Mord Sith and protect you from harming yourself..

I get so turned on when guys talk Sci Fi to me!

[Suckrates]

While it is nice to have these "Daddy" issue discussions from time to time, you have to know that I HATE them with a passion. I can't even tell you how much I hate them. It makes me want to turn into some werewolf and start chomping on the thread.

Do I need therapy?

Therapy NO, but might I suggest taking a page from your Peers handbook and LOCKDOWN THE THREAD ?

[citylaw1]

In the subsequent posts to this thread the one comment that did get my attention and I didn't think was appropriate was a statement about Daddy fabricating reviews in exchange for favors. Perhaps Daddy has acknowledged that but I don't recall that being the case so I personally don't appreciate when such things are stated without substantiation. While I am not a fan of Daddy in any way, I still don't feel comfortable with such things being said.

I know for sure that negative reviews written about favored escorts are filtered (trashed); therefore, by hypothesis, I'm reasonably confident that some are fabricated entirely.

I am the author of several reviews on Daddy's, more on the former Hooboy site, and a few here. I have never submitted a negative review, save one - a very deserving review that I submitted of a very favored escort of the past. This review was not published, and I received a reprimand (poorly written) instead. At this point I left the board and site altogether. Honestly, Marc Anthony is right - I should stop even peeking. I wish more reviews were submitted here. I can't answer why I even peruse that site, in that I'm sure, like the National Enquirer, there is fabrication to say the least.

[citylaw1]

While it is nice to have these "Daddy" issue discussions from time to time, you have to know that I HATE them with a passion. I can't even tell you how much I hate them. It makes me want to turn into some werewolf and start chomping on the thread.

Do I need therapy?

I can understand your feelings entirely. I only share Daddy stuff here sparingly (I try anyway) out of respect for the administrators and their site. The patience and hands off approach to moderation here is most welcoming in comparison.

[citylaw1]

Therapy NO, but might I suggest taking a page from your Peers handbook and LOCKDOWN THE THREAD ?

Mimicking poor moderation isn't the answer.

[Suckrates]

I can understand your feelings entirely. I only share Daddy stuff here sparingly (I try anyway) out of respect for the administrators and their site. The patience and hands off approach to moderation here is most welcoming in comparison.

Oh City, you always make me chuckle.... you are a Mater at Damage Control, or should I say Ass-kissing ? But I have to AGREE

with you on this one. The 2 Managements are like nite and Day. Or more Appropriately HEAVEN and HELL

[citylaw1]

No, but several posters with "Daddy issues" do and should realize that Oz and TY's couch is not the place to resolve them.

While I agree in part, I also feel like this is a place where lies and hidden agendas can be called out. Most posters here dabble in both sites.

I do respect your take on it though. It's not entirely off base.

The "overall and straw hat" thread was certainly warranted though. It gave me a chubby.

[citylaw1]

Oh City, you always make me chuckle.... you are a Mater at Damage Control, or should I say Ass-kissing ? But I have to AGREE

with you on this one. The 2 Managements are like nite and Day. Or more Appropriately HEAVEN and HELL

I'll assume you meant "master at damage control," and respond accordingly. You have painted me as an obsessive villain and "ass kisser" in one day?

I'm many things, but a sycophant is not one. For convenience I have provided you with a link to the definition: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/sycophant

[Suckrates]

I'll assume you meant "master at damage control," and respond accordingly. You have painted me as an obsessive villain and "ass kisser" in one day?

I'm many things, but a sycophant is not one. For convenience I have provided you with a link to the definition: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/sycophant

Truly smart people dont have to try so hard to convince people they are.... Anyone can pick words out of a book. But your character traits are truly cultivated, and I have to respect that. Pointing out the commoness and randomness of TYPOS is so trivial. LOL, now you have another character flaw to add to your list. Rack em Up ! but I say that with Love, since you stated one of my previous posts gave you a "Chubby"... I knew I turned you on Babe !.

[citylaw1]

Truly smart people dont have to try so hard to convince people they are.... Anyone can pick words out of a book. But your character traits are truly cultivated, and I have to respect that. Pointing out the commoness and randomness of TYPOS is so trivial. LOL, now you have another character flaw to add to your list. Rack em Up ! but I say that with Love, since you stated one of my previous posts gave you a "Chubby"... I knew I turned you on Babe !.

"Commoness" (sic) is the incorrect word http://www.thefreedictionary.com/commonness

[Suckrates]

"Commoness" (sic) is the incorrect word http://www.thefreedictionary.com/commonness

Give it a rest Professor... Proofread your own shit first !

[TampaYankee]

Let's discuss the issues and not each other. No one else really cares what you think of each other. That is a private conversation best taken off-line. Thanks.

Also, best to make clear distinction between that suspected and that which is proven fact, lest credibility suffer in the confusion. Just the better debate form.

[citylaw1]

Let's discuss the issues and not each other. No one else really cares what you think of each other. That is a private conversation best taken off-line. Thanks.

Also, best to make clear distinction between that suspected and that which is proven fact, lest credibility suffer in the confusion. Just the better debate form.

I Couldn't agree more; quite often I find myself defending (not much effort) my embattled moniker against JJ's assumptions.

I feel as though I've contributed fact, supposition, opinion, and personal experience to this, and most threads that I comment on.

I wonder if others have any personal experiences to add? If not, I've exhausted my arsenal.

[Guest jimboivyo]

and as if by magic, a review of one of the escorts talked about appears in today's (daddys) line up. after not being reviewed for several months, now it surfaces. a little queer if you ask me

[TotallyOz]

and as if by magic, a review of one of the escorts talked about appears in today's (daddys) line up. after not being reviewed for several months, now it surfaces. a little queer if you ask me

Please, don't be upset about that. If you read that review, you will find such depth and understanding. It was so wonderful to read that I felt I was there with the reviewer experiencing it first hand. He gave such great detail about the experience.

[Guest NCBored]

Please, don't be upset about that. If you read that review, you will find such depth and understanding. It was so wonderful to read that I felt I was there with the reviewer experiencing it first hand. He gave such great detail about the experience.

Do you plan to exercise your critical faculties on the reviews on this site? You won't have to go past the first page to find similar.

[TotallyOz]

Do you plan to exercise your critical faculties on the reviews on this site? You won't have to go past the first page to find similar.

Really? Can you point out one on the first page that is like the one for the guy being discussed in this thread? I just read the ones on the first page on this site and didn't think any were AS similar. But, I guess my critical faculties are quite up to yours. BTW: one similar thing I did see was a review on this site from me (Alex Wolf) for an encounter I paid for with him. Oh, wait. Sorry, that is not similar to the one being discussed is it? I listed my name and it came from me. I was up front in that I hired him and promoted him. I wanted him to get work. However, I did it with my own name: TotallyOz Humm. What similarities were you thinking about?

[Guest NCBored]

I dislike criticizing reviews, but please explain how this one differs significantly from the one you mock: http://www.boytoy.com/index.php?mdf=reviews&escort_id=208010007&review_id=2029

[TotallyOz]

I dislike criticizing reviews, but please explain how this one differs significantly from the one you mock: http://www.boytoy.com/index.php?mdf=reviews&escort_id=208010007&review_id=2029

If you can't see the difference between that one and the one posted of Peter, you may need to just go over to the donate button and sign up for monthly contributions to the daddy fund. I hear a tithe is appropriate.

[Guest NCBored]

If you can't see the difference between that one and the one posted of Peter, you may need to just go over to the donate button and sign up for monthly contributions to the daddy fund. I hear a tithe is appropriate.

While it is nice to have these "Daddy" issue discussions from time to time, you have to know that I HATE them with a passion. I can't even tell you how much I hate them. It makes me want to turn into some werewolf and start chomping on the thread.

Do I need therapy?

Guess you don't hate them so much after all.

But I'll leave the last word to you.

But it saddens me to see the increasingly negative tone here.

[TotallyOz]

Guess you don't hate them so much after all.

Quite wrong again. I do despise them. And, I hate when they drag on and one and on. But, from time to time, I'll make a post and try to lighten things up. Someone always takes it the wrong way. Humm. I wonder when that happened in this thread? Oh, shit, I forget. But, I do appreciate having the last word. My family always said I loved that as a kid.

That being said, please don't be upset or angry that I disagree with you. I posted in this thread as another poster and not an admin admonishing anyone. I know it is not always easy to tell the difference but I also have an opinion from time to time. I rarely, publicly have a disagreement with anyone on this site. But, for some reason, you post rubbed me the wrong way and once that happens, the kitty claws come out. I guess to be honest, it blows my mind that you could not see the difference. I am sure it blows your mind that I saw something different than you saw. That is life. No offense taken or meant on my part. Honest!

ps thanks for the therapy. I needed that today.

[AdamSmith]

http://www.amazon.com/Treating-Attachment-Pathology-Jon-Mills/dp/0765701324

[BigK]

Quite wrong again. I do despise them. And, I hate when they drag on and one and on. But, from time to time, I'll make a post and try to lighten things up. Someone always takes it the wrong way. Humm. I wonder when that happened in this thread? Oh, shit, I forget. But, I do appreciate having the last word. My family always said I loved that as a kid.

That being said, please don't be upset or angry that I disagree with you. I posted in this thread as another poster and not an admin admonishing anyone. I know it is not always easy to tell the difference but I also have an opinion from time to time. I rarely, publicly have a disagreement with anyone on this site. But, for some reason, you post rubbed me the wrong way and once that happens, the kitty claws come out. I guess to be honest, it blows my mind that you could not see the difference. I am sure it blows your mind that I saw something different than you saw. That is life. No offense taken or meant on my part. Honest!

ps thanks for the therapy. I needed that today.

I enjoy it when you post Oz. I have no problem recognizing the difference between when you are posting as a contributor rather than a administrator.

Please don't hold back.

[Lucky]

...

That being said, please don't be upset or angry that I disagree with you. I posted in this thread as another poster and not an admin admonishing anyone. I know it is not always easy to tell the difference but I also have an opinion from time to time. I rarely, publicly have a disagreement with anyone on this site. But, for some reason, you post rubbed me the wrong way and once that happens, the kitty claws come out. I guess to be honest, it blows my mind that you could not see the difference. I am sure it blows your mind that I saw something different than you saw. That is life. No offense taken or meant on my part. Honest!

ps thanks for the therapy. I needed that today.

Since I first saw this post, I have been stretching my mind, using both cylinders, trying to think of a time when Oz might have had a public disagreement with someone. I can't come up with one! Isn't that amazing that a guy with so many posts is so calm and collected all the time? And kitty claws? I so doubt that! But I do see where it can be hard to be both a poster and an admin. I'd have a separate name for one of them.

[TampaYankee]

But it saddens me to see the increasingly negative tone here.

NCBored, I'm disappointed by this comment and I believe it is uncalled for. There is no increaslingly negative tone here. For those mathematically literate that implies a montonically increasing function. For laymen it means going uphill constantly. I reject that.

From time to time we have people who have differences. This appears to be such a case. It's a blip on the radar screen nothing more. It is not admin policy and Oz isn't going thru manopause. (Are you?)

You two had a difference and, uncharacteristically, it got under his skin. I've certainly been known to get out of sorts on occasion -- maybe this is one. That does NOT mean the tone is becoming increaslingly negative here.

Maybe he got under your skin too causing you to make what I consider a rash remark. I don't know. But what I do know is that almost everyone who comments on site atmosphere and admin and moderation style prefer this site's style over others. I'm sure that is not universal but that is what people who attend both sites express here.

I appreciate your contributions, well all but this one. . I appreciate Oz's contributions, almost all anyway . On second thought, maybe I'm the cause of the increasingly negative tone? I probably wouldn't be sensitive to that. If so, that would take the wind out of my own sail wouldn't it?

On a wider note on this thread, I would have accepted the Peter Hung review if it passed vetting. While content was minimal it was sufficient to indicate escort preformance specifics at a general level and client satisfaction. That is something one can hang his hat on in contrast to "He's wonderful, I had a great time and you will too."

I do suspect the timing of this review was not coincidence. That site has been known in the past for a review queue backlog of weeks between submission and posting. I do not know if that is still the case but a one or two day turnaround for the average review does seem out of line at that site.

I do not know who wrote this review. It would not be a stretch to conclude what some have in this thread. However, a clue to another potential author may be found in the client self description if it can be believed. If not why put it in?