Most Dangerous Cities In US

[Guest FourAces]

10. Cleveland, Ohio
> Violent crimes per 100,000: 1,383.8
> Population: 393,781
> 2012 murders: 84
> Poverty rate: 34.3%
> Pct. of adults with high school degree: 77.0%

More than 825 robberies were reported in Cleveland for every 100,000 residents last year, the second highest robbery rate in the nation behind only Oakland. The total number of robberies in the city rose from 3,156 in 2011 to 3,252 in 2012. Cleveland also had the nation’s second highest burglary rate in 2012, with close to 2,500 burglaries per 100,000 residents. Unlike robbery, burglary does not involve force or coercion and is not considered a violent crime. Recently, the highly publicized discovery of three area women that had been missing for roughly a decade and held captive within the city led to extensive criticism of the Cleveland Police Department. Cleveland is one of the nation’s poorest large cities with a median household income of just $25,731 in 2011 — barely over half the national median.

9. Baltimore, Md.
> Violent crimes per 100,000: 1,405.7
> Population: 625,474
> 2012 murders: 219
> Poverty rate: 25.1%
> Pct. of adults with high school degree: 80.5%

There were 219 murders in Baltimore in 2012, more than all but five other major cities both in absolute terms and per capita. In addition, the city’s robbery rate of 576.4 cases per 100,000 people was the ninth highest in the country. Despite remaining one of the most violent cities, city officials noted that crime rates have been declining. While the total number of murders increased, total gun crime fell by 6% compared to 2011, according to the Baltimore Police Department. In addition, the city’s property crime rate of 4,660.3 cases per 100,000 residents was lower than any of the top cities for violent crime.

8. New Haven, Conn.
> Violent crimes per 100,000: 1,439.2
> Population: 129,934
> 2012 murders: 17
> Poverty rate: 30.1%
> Pct. of adults with high school degree: 78.4%

There were 766 robberies in New Haven in 2011, or 589.1 cases per 100,000 residents, the eighth highest rate among all cities considered that year. In 2012, the number of robberies in the city jumped to 844. At 649.6 robberies per 100,000 residents, this was one of the highest rates recorded in 2012. But while both robberies and aggravated assaults rose last year, the number of murders declined from 34 in 2011 to just 17 in 2012. Gun violence remains a concern for the community. Recently, police began reaching out to known gang members on probation or parole to offer help to members looking to earn a high school diploma or otherwise improve their lives. As of 2011, just 78.4% of New Haven residents over 25 had a high school diploma, much lower than the 85.9% rate nationwide.

7. Birmingham, Ala.
> Violent crimes per 100,000: 1,517.8
> Population: 213,266
> 2012 murders: 67
> Poverty rate: 32.0%
> Pct. of adults with high school degree: 81.3%

Birmingham had among the 10 highest murder and aggravated assault rates at 31.4 cases per 100,000 people and 954.2 cases per 100,000 residents, respectively, in 2012. The city also had 6,934.1 property crimes per 100,000 people in 2012, higher than all but four other cities. This included 2,205.7 burglaries per 100,000, the sixth highest of all cities. City residents are in a far worse economic position than the nation as a whole. The median household income in Birmingham was just $28,646 in 2011, far lower than the $50,502 across the United States. Also, 32% of the population lived below the poverty line that year, compared with just under 16% nationwide.

6. Stockton, Calif.
> Violent crimes per 100,000: 1,548.0
> Population: 299,105
> 2012 murders: 71
> Poverty rate: 25.8%
> Pct. of adults with high school degree: 75.1%

The number of violent crimes reported in Stockton rose from 4,155 in 2011 to 4,630 in 2012. This was partly due to the increase in the number of robberies, from 1,323 in 2011 to 1,556 last year, and the increase in the number of aggravated assaults, from 2,684 in 2011 to 2,913 in 2012. As a result of this uptick in crime, Stockton had some of the highest incidences of murder, robbery and aggravated assault in the nation. Stockton also holds the dubious distinction of being the largest city in U.S. history, by population, to enter bankruptcy. In the city proper, the unemployment rate was 18.3% in 2012, more than 10 percentage points above the national rate last year.

5. Memphis, Tenn.
> Violent crimes per 100,000: 1,750.0
> Population: 657,436
> 2012 murders: 133
> Poverty rate: 27.2%
> Percentage of adults with high school degree: 83.4%

Memphis had the third highest rate of aggravated assault in 2012, with 1,151.9 cases per 100,000 residents. This was up from the 1,032.3 cases per 100,000 in 2011. The city’s murder rate of 20.2 per 100,000 people and robbery rate of 514.4 per 100,000 people were also up from 2011. The high levels of crime has people in the Memphis area feeling uneasy. According to a recent Gallup survey, roughly 43% of Memphis area residents reported feeling unsafe walking at night, the highest percentage of all the 50 largest metropolitan areas in the country and significantly higher than the 28% across the United States.

4. St. Louis, Mo.
> Violent crimes per 100,000: 1,776.5
> Population: 318,667
> 2012 murders: 113
> Poverty rate: 27.0%
> Percentage of adults with high school degree: 83.9%

There were 1,120.6 aggravated assaults per 100,000 people in St. Louis in 2012, higher than all but three other cities. Moreover, the murder rate of 35.5 cases per 100,000 was the fifth highest of all cities. Although St. Louis’s violent crime was still among the highest in the country, it has improved. There were 80 less violent crimes per 100,000 people in 2012 compared to 2011 — the best improvement of any city on this list, with the drop mostly attributable to 106 less robberies per 100,000 people in 2012 compared to the previous year. Law enforcement officials attributed some of the drop to an increased police presence in high-crime neighborhoods.

3. Oakland, Calif.
> Violent crimes per 100,000: 1,993.1
> Population: 399,487
> 2012 murders: 126
> Poverty rate: 21.0%
> Percentage of adults with high school degree: 79.9%

There were 1,085.9 robberies per 100,000 residents in Oakland in 2012, higher than any other city. This was also significantly higher than the 851.2 robberies per 100,000 just a year earlier. The rates of murder and aggravated assaults also increased in 2012 compared to 2011. Violent crime was not the only issue in Oakland, either — there were 6,594 property crimes per 100,000 residents in 2012, more than all but eight other cities, and up from 5,287.9 in 2011. Crime in the city has increased ever since the city’s police department went through a round of layoffs in 2010 due to $30.5 million deficit.

2. Detroit, Mich.
> Violent crimes per 100,000: 2,122.6
> Population: 707,096
> 2012 murders: 386
> Poverty rate: 40.9%
> Percentage of adults with high school degree: 77.4%

Detroit’s murder rate of 54.2 per 100,000 residents was the second highest in the country last year. The homicide rate in Detroit, which included 386 criminal murders and an additional 25 justifiable homicides, reached the highest level in nearly 40 years. In addition, the city’s aggravated assault rate of 1,320.8 cases per 100,000 people was also the second highest in the United States, although this was an improvement from the 1,333.6 cases per 100,000 residents in 2011. Detroit has struggled economically in recent years. The city’s 2012 unemployment rate was a whopping 18.6%, much higher than the 8.1% across the nation last year. The median household income of $25,193 was less than half the national median for 2011.

1. Flint, Mich.
> Violent crimes per 100,000: 2,729.5
> Population: 101,632
> 2012 murders: 63
> Poverty rate: 40.6%
> Percentage of adults with high school degree: 82.9%

With a staggering 2,729.5 violent crimes per 100,000 residents, no city had a higher violent crime rate than Flint. The city of just 101,632 people had 63 total murders and 1,930 aggravated assaults, both the highest relative to the city’s population. Flint also had nationwide highs in burglary rates and arson per 100,000 people. The sheriff of Genesee County, where Flint is located, proposed a plan to create a violent crime mobile response unit that would cost $3 million. However, Governor Rick Snyder rejected the plan because he believed resources would be better “integrated into the ongoing efforts to make Flint safer.” Like Detroit, Flint has suffered economically in recent years. The median household income was just $23,380 in 2011, the second-lowest of all 555 cities measured by the U.S. Census Bureau.

[RA1]

I never know what lists such as this really might mean, other than be careful when in big cities.

I have been to every one of those cities and live in one. My motto has always been, keep moving.

When one tarries too long in one spot, one increases the likelihood of being "attacked" or whatever. Therefore, if one likes to go to many different bars and many different localities for fun and recreation, likely this increases one's personal liability. NP, if that is your choice, just be aware of what you are doing.

Best regards,

RA1

[wayout]

My motto has always been, keep moving.

When one tarries too long in one spot, one increases the likelihood of being "attacked" or whatever. Therefore, if one likes to go to many different bars and many different localities for fun and recreation, likely this increases one's personal liability. NP, if that is your choice, just be aware of what you are doing.

I tend to agree with RA1 about keep moving and add to that to always be aware of your surroundings and what is going on around you, especially if in a city you aren't that familiar with. I suppose there is a fine line to becoming paranoid or afraid to venture out and live life if one is too cautious but in today's world one has to at least be always alert on some level.

I live in one of those 10 most dangerous cities and totally not surprised that it made the top 10. I haven't had any problems in the years I've lived here. Maybe it has been through being cautious, being aware of my surroundings, knowing where and where not to venture, or just pure luck.

[RA1]

As wayout says, being aware is always a good thing. As he also says, being paranoid is counter productive. I have been "lucky" in that most of the time I have had locals to meet me when I arrived and show me around. Nothing like being shown Piccadilly Circus, Trafalgar Square, Hyde Park and many other London sites by a local, even if it was all over in 30 minutes. Ditto, the Matterhorn from 14,000 feet in a pressurized aircraft.

Being alert and aware is NOT the same as being paranoid, or so I think.

Best regards,

RA1

[Guest FourAces]

I agree that being aware of surroundings is the best way to go ... however, just because one knows a city or area well do not become complacent. That is usually a recipe for disaster

Over the years I have been to several of the cities on the list. What I find a bit glaring are the cities not on there. For example Las Vegas comes to mind immediately. And though DC its not a city it usually is thrown in with them.

It would help to know the criteria used to select the cities listed.

[boiworship]

North Las Vegas is a no-go zone, but the rest of the city is well-policed. DC is rapidly gentrifying, so its crime rate has fallen a bit. I was amazed at the changes on S Capitol St when I was there last fall.

[Guest CharliePS]

It's interesting to see that Flint is #1. My brother-in-law and his family lived in the suburbs for years, and never was worried about the place. We were afraid that when he retired and wanted to move, the reputation of the city would make it difficult for him to sell; instead, he sold the house for full asking price in one week.

The fact that most of these cities are dangerous for some residents doesn't mean that they are dangerous for visitors or even most residents. I lived the majority of my adult life in New York and Philadelphia, and outsiders often asked if I was worried about the dangers--well, no. Most of the violent crime--even the property crime--is concentrated in poor neighborhoods in which I spent little time. When a tourist or upper middle class resident is murdered, it makes the news partly because it is actually an unusual occurrence. One of the reasons New York (specifically Manhattan) doesn't make this list is because there are hardly any poor neighborhoods left there, and crime rates in DC are falling because of the same kind of gentrification.

[RA1]

I never felt threatened in FNT (Flint, MI) even though it was a fairly near suburb of DTW (Detroit). But then I never felt threatened in DTW either, largely for the same reasons Charlie PSP mentions. Also, as mentioned before, keep moving.

Where have I felt threatened? Well, one time I delivered a small aircraft to a VW dealer in a suburb of PHL. He was very nice, did not present any problems, took me to the "inner sanctum" of the dealership (upstairs) where every thing going on could be observed, gave me a VW "racing jacket" and paid in cash. So far, so good. Then he bade me good-bye, "gave" me a clean up guy in an old pick-up truck and told him to take me to PHL. It was dark and I had 30,000 in cash and an "unknown" ride. Made me a little nervous but it was all up and up. However, when I arrived at PHL, there was a LOT of construction going on and walking from one terminal to another with nothing but dimly lit temporary lights and canvas between me and the elements once more aroused my WTF gene.

Actually no problems other than my mind being cautious. BTW, a VW racing jacket then was a light blue overall jacket with vertical red and white stripes. I liked it but it was not my size.

Best regards,

RA1

[AdamSmith]

As noted above, hard to know what to make of such lists, bereft as they are of context. (Back to today's earlier theme: thank you SO much, reporters, for helping us understand what the news means. )

For example, would be useful to know the crime rates for the safest cities, so we could see if there is that much difference and, if so, maybe why.

[RA1]

What reporters? They are so few and far between, when you find one, please latch onto him or her and praise them at every opportunity. (I know you do.)

The safest cities and the most dangerous ones are just a matter of statistics. But statistics are a matter of exposure, are they not? A wide place in the road with 100 population is less likely to do you in than a city of 1 million, no? However, one bullet, one knife, one hatchet, one hammer or the like used on you personally could have the same negative effect regardless of the relative population.

So, be careful when in a crowd, defined as you + one or more other folks.

Best regards,

RA1