Jump to content
Guest lurkerspeaks

AA and USAIR merger approved by both boards

Recommended Posts

Guest lurkerspeaks
Posted

It looks like bad news for us here in Phoenix. We will lose USAir's homebase here, as the new American Airlines will be based out of Ft Worth.

  • Members
Posted

Don't be in a rush to give up enjoying your preference just yet. First the boards have to agree, then the US has to approve, then it will take 2-3 years for much to happen that is noticable.

However, yes, there will be consolidation, etc. and reduction of competition is never good for the consumer.

This likely will be an inconvenience, perhaps an expensive one but an inconvenience just the same. And, it won't happen tomorrow.

Best regards,

RA1

Guest hitoallusa
Posted

I have never liked US Air... American Airline has always been friendly..

Posted

I am keeping my fingers crossed it works out for the consumer but not hopeful. USAir's chairman has shown a disdain for their frequent flyers in the past. I have been with American since 1994 and have flown over 3.8 million miles with them. From 1994 to 2008 I was flying 6 to 8 flights a month. the past two years I have cut down alot but I had no complaints with their frequent flyer program.

  • Members
Posted

Don't be in a rush to give up enjoying your preference just yet. First the boards have to agree, then the US has to approve, then it will take 2-3 years for much to happen that is noticable.

Both Airline's Boards approved the merger on Wednesday and Government approval, according to all the Business media, is a given. They will keep the name "American" but US Airways seems to be the controlling group due to the American bankruptcy.

  • Members
Posted

This just means a lot of service cuts, layoffs at un-needed hubs, and higher prices.

Yup. The airline industry has gone into the toilet in the last five or so years. I'm glad I have no reasons to fly these days cause I'd sure spend a lot of my time pissed off.

  • Members
Posted

SW acquired Air Tran in May of 2011, almost two years ago. So far there is little difference. Both are still operating under their previous names with basically the same rules, for instance, AT charges for bags while SW does not. The complete integration of the name, routes and rules of transport are still many months away, at least. There will be a toe in the water expansion of AT routes late this coming summer.

I expect AA and US to proceed at the same kind of pace. You just can't snap your fingers and have thousands of folks move, routes change, signs change, logos change, etc., etc. I suppose you can do all that but not without spending a LOT of money and having a bigger PR nightmare on your hands than already in place.

I have posted this before but to repeat, when deregulation was adopted in 1978 it was widely predicted that there would only be 3-5 flag carriers after a couple of decades or so. We now are about to have 4.

We got "cheaper" fares, at least until the price of oil went out of sight, but much worse service in every definition of the word. Cabin service, route service, non-stop service, equipment changes and much more has deteriorated steadily. Many suggest there is no such thing as "F" any longer meaning all are cattle class with the only distinction being in which end of the plane is your seat.

Obviously I could go on but I will resist and desist. ^_^

Best regards,

RA1

Guest rimchair
Posted

These guys didn’t merge to make passengers lives better, they merged for their own purposes.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...