Problems with Different Websites

[Lucky]

There is a website called biddingfortravel.com at which I participated for a long time and contributed quite a bit of information. The website is owned by a woman named Sheryl, and she rules the place with an iron hand and a short temperament. She has driven so many posters away that the site is of much less value since so few contributions come in.

The purpose of the site is good. You post the bid that won you a hotel on Priceline, and this helps others make more intelligent bids on Priceline. You no longer bid so blindly. If you have no trouble following Sheryl's rules, the site might make your bidding much better.

Sheryl does not like the fact that I find her rules cumbersome and say so. She beat deej to the punch long ago and banned me! It always amazes me that sites that depend on contributions of members can be so difficult to deal with. She is still in business, and I have no problem with you using that site to your benefit.

I not only made money for her by using her link to Priceline, I travel a lot and provided many helpful bid information and other contributions to the site. Thankfully I am now a pretty savvy Priceline bidder and don't need the site as much.

Are there any sites that you have problems with? Let us know so we can avoid them!

[citylaw1]

There is a website called biddingfortravel.com at which I participated for a long time and contributed quite a bit of information. The website is owned by a woman named Sheryl, and she rules the place with an iron hand and a short temperament. She has driven so many posters away that the site is of much less value since so few contributions come in.

The purpose of the site is good. You post the bid that won you a hotel on Priceline, and this helps others make more intelligent bids on Priceline. You no longer bid so blindly. If you have no trouble following Sheryl's rules, the site might make your bidding much better.

Sheryl does not like the fact that I find her rules cumbersome and say so. She beat deej to the punch long ago and banned me! It always amazes me that sites that depend on contributions of members can be so difficult to deal with. She is still in business, and I have no problem with you using that site to your benefit.

I not only made money for her by using her link to Priceline, I travel a lot and provided many helpful bid information and other contributions to the site. Thankfully I am now a pretty savvy Priceline bidder and don't need the site as much.

Are there any sites that you have problems with? Let us know so we can avoid them!

She does look like one tough cookie.

[Guest BudFoxx]

There are now four active threads on this forum slamming and talking about the other site. How much is enough?

[citylaw1]

There are now four active threads on this forum slamming and talking about the other site. How much is enough?

5

[AdamSmith]

5

LOL

[Guest BudFoxx]

5

LOL then. But For God sakes get it out of your system girl Before you start to have Premature facial wrinkling from the stress! ????

[citylaw1]

LOL then. But For God sakes get it out of your system girl Before you start to have Premature facial wrinkling from the stress!

I have just contacted Russian dima for drinks and a lay tonight. That ass is tighter than my forearm. Maybe I'll take a pic for Deej to paste to his wheelchair.

[Guest BudFoxx]

I have just contacted Russian dima for drinks and a lay tonight. That ass is tighter than my forearm. Maybe I'll take a pic for Deej to paste to his wheelchair.

Ballsy!

[citylaw1]

I have just contacted Russian dima for drinks and a lay tonight. That ass is tighter than my forearm. Maybe I'll take a pic for Deej to paste to his wheelchair.

So .. drinks and a roll in the hay (3 hours) is $600. Perhaps my company isn't as enjoyable as I thought?

[AdamSmith]

Good God. One could have offed one of The Web's dancers for nigh on a week for that sum.

But then ... you can't take it with you!

[citylaw1]

Good God. One could have offed one of The Web's dancers for nigh on a week for that sum.

But then ... you can't take it with you!

I actually turned it down. I don't need company while I drink. I left open the one hour ($280) fuck as a late evening option. Scouring CL like the old days. $600 just seems crazy to me right now.

[AdamSmith]

Good. It's Monday night, bound to be dead business night for more than one working guy. You might well find good pickin's.

[Guest BudFoxx]

$600 just seems crazy to me right now.

Especially when you've been fucked once already Earlier in the day! No need to be piggish. ????

[lookin]

Personally, I don't mind folks airing their grievances or anything else they choose to air. Sometimes it does a body good to purge the evil vapors.

But I'm never sure where the line is between venting and kvetching. A day or two, and a thread or two, seems about right to me. Less than that, and the noxious gases may continue to build and cause distress. And more than that may give this site a reputation as The Village of the Banned and make it less desirable for new members.

I recall a site called EscortSpeak which was an offshoot of another site and seemed to owe its very existence to disgruntled posters from the other site. Soon enough, anyone who wanted to let bygones be bygones and move on to more positive topics was marginalized. It became a very negative place and eventually ceased to exist.

I have no doubt that OZ and TY are able to see any such trends developing here and take whatever precautions are necessary to protect their 'brand'. But one of the things I enjoy so much about this site is that the members are usually able to moderate themselves, and free up TY and OZ for more worthwhile pursuits.

Like Lucky, I hope that it will soon be time to move on to more creative threads and leave the past in the rear view mirror.

[RA1]

If only my rear view mirror would have such "rears" in it.

Best regards,

RA1

[Lucky]

All I asked was for the bitching and kvetching to be done in a thread that did not have my name in the title.

[Guest BudFoxx]

All I asked was for the bitching and kvetching to be done in a thread that did not have my name in the title.

But now dear, because of you, it now does have your name in it. Don't press your luck, this is no longer about you! Be happy about that. :-)

[Lucky]

Thanks, Bud. Where would we be if you had not decided to join us?

[marcanthony]

This entire thread to this point is an excellent example of why it's worth it to stop here everyday. Can't ask for better entertainment!

1) Lucky: happy the discussion no longer has your name on the title

2) Adam: thanks for bringing back memories of "offing" boys for $600/week, whether from the now defunct Web or elsewhere

3) Citylaw: sincerely hope you got drunk and laid for less than $600, and even if it was MUCH less, hope you reported the event (in detail) to deej

4) Lookin': thanks for the eyecandy and the perspective about the reason we are here

5) BuddFoxx: for the line of the week!!! "Especially when you've been fucked once already Earlier in the day! No need to be piggish"

going to bed with a smile on my face!

[TampaYankee]

Sheryl does not like the fact that I find her rules cumbersome and say so. She beat deej to the punch long ago and banned me! It always amazes me that sites that depend on contributions of members can be so difficult to deal with. She is still in business, and I have no problem with you using that site to your benefit.

I used the site heavily about ten years ago. Have dropped out since. Too bad the participation has dropped off and with it it's usefulness.

Do you mind sharing what sort of burdensome rules she imposed? Just curious and prefer not to wade through history to find out what happened. Thanks.

[BiBottomBoy]

Gawker and Jezebel often ban people who don't toe the line and conform to the editors' egos.

[Guest josephga]

I use to post on ATKOL allot. One of the first sites I joined in 1997. Then last year It wouldn't take my pass code. They don't have pass word retriever so you could have it emailed to you. Plus in all these years the site pretty much looks the same and outdated.

[BiBottomBoy]

I've been trying to reset my Photobucket password for two months now and they keep saying they are emailing me a new password but never do.

[Lucky]

Last week I was in New York. I was told, and subsequently saw for myself, that several nice things were said about me on the other site. I want all of those people to know that I appreciate their kind remarks, because I really do.

Some mention that they miss my theater reviews, but if you know any of those folks, please let them know that my theater reviews are now here. Send them the link! http://www.boytoy.com/forums/index.php?/forum/253-theater-art-and-literature/

Some think that all I have to do is make a generic sort of apology to the owner of the site, and all will be well again.

Cooper posted that I was done with the site and was moving on. He was right.

So, here is the word straight from the horse's mouth: I do not want to be a member of the message board at Daddy's Reviews. I don't like Daddy, and I disdain deej. I don't care to apologize to a man who posted using my user name. It seems to me that he is the one who owes an apology. I was given no warning or right to know the reason why I was banned. It just happened when I complained about the name Lucky being on a post that I didn't write. The idea that I was banned because I didn't apologize for some unspecified crime came along well after I was banned.

Rest assured, I have banned myself from posting at Daddy's reviews. My complaint about the misuse of my user name said that I could post there no longer without an apology, and I think that's where the idea came about that I should apologize rather than this person. It's a red herring meant to distract you from what really happened.

The End.

[lookin]

It's a red herring meant to distract you from what really happened.

The End.

Or is it?