Jump to content
eeyore

No more twinkies?

Recommended Posts

  • Members

The union decided to sacrifice that 18000 jobs rather than establish a precedent that might affect several other unionized companies. It's shit like this that gives unions a bad name. :angry:

I thought it was more transparently union-busting, myself. It's hard not to believe the name and the product won't be bought out and continue... without all the current employees...

Then again, as fat as Americans have gotten there're quite a few who at the least avoid the worst of the worse junk-food (i.e. Hostess's whole line...), so maybe their marketshare was tanking?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...