Jump to content
TampaYankee

Creepy new anti-privacy bill being considered by Hawaii legislature

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Creepy new anti-privacy bill being considered by Hawaii legislature

Bill would create a database detailing who visits what websites

by Fox Van Allen | Last updated 5:32PM EST on January 26, 2012

In what is only the latest attempt at government intrusion on internet users' privacy, the Hawaii State Legislature is currently debating a bill that would create a massive database of what state residents visit which websites. If passed, it would be the most wide-reaching anti-privacy web initiative in the country.

The bill, H.B. 2288, was introduced by State Rep. John Mizuno (D). According to the bill's official description, it "requires internet service providers to keep consumer records for no less than 2 years." The bill spells out exactly what must be recorded: "each subscriber's information and internet destination history information," which includes any of the following: "internet protocol addresses; domain name; or host name." The Hawaii State Senate is considering a similar measure, S.B. 2530.

One major problem with the bill, aside from the obvious privacy concerns, is that it's incredibly vague. Not only could it require cable companies to keep detailed records, but public libraries, resorts with guest computers, and even coffee shops that offer customers free wifi could be on the hook to keep records, as well.

According to State Senator Jill Tokuda (D), the senate sponsor of the bill, H.B. 2288 and S.B. 2530 were filed in response to a dispute involving State Rep. Kym Pine ® and her ex-web designer. The web designer is alleged to have hacked Pine's email.

fva-headshot-50x50.jpgFox Van Allen is a Boston-based freelance writer specializing in the subjects of science, technology, and video gaming.

See original article at:

http://www.tecca.com/news/2012/01/26/hb-2288-sb-2530-hawaii-anti-web-privacy-bill/

Posted

Why on earth would they want to create a law like that? Is there a reason for the need to save all history of internet searches in the bill somewhere? That just seems like a massive invasion of privacy. I think that would not stand up in court after one hearing.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...