Guest FourAces Posted December 7, 2011 Posted December 7, 2011 .... or dressed up to look like one? I have more pics of him at my blog. Photo removed. I appreciate your enthusiasm for sharing but I'm not confortable with the age certainty of this person. I prefer to err on the conservative side with posts on this site. TY Quote
Members Lucky Posted December 8, 2011 Members Posted December 8, 2011 Having seen the picture,it was the first thing I thought of when I saw this story today on a gay teen who killed himself. They look quite a bit alike, or perhaps it's just the hairstyle. Teen Suicide Quote
Members lookin Posted December 8, 2011 Members Posted December 8, 2011 These stories are so heartbreaking. It's becoming quite clear that far too many schools and parents/caretakers don't have the knowledge, desire, and/or ability to take care of these kids. I think both the bullied kid and the bully need professional counselling. If the school has a psychologist on staff, fine. If not, both kids would be sent to an outside psychologist who could provide the necessary treatment to stop the cycle and avoid these tragic consequences. Why not make such counselling mandatory in every single case when it's reported to school authorities? The bill for psychological treatment would be paid by the school and forwarded on to the parents of the bullies. No pay, no extracurricular play, and no graduation day. Quote
Guest FourAces Posted December 8, 2011 Posted December 8, 2011 @TY or OZ Hmmm what happened to the picture? @Lucky yes that is a bit scary they look somewhat alike especially the hair as you mentioned. @Lookin yes these stories are very heart-crushing to see. Another young man will be missed and lost to us all. Quote
Members TampaYankee Posted December 8, 2011 Members Posted December 8, 2011 @TY or OZ Hmmm what happened to the picture? @Lucky yes that is a bit scary they look somewhat alike especially the hair as you mentioned. @Lookin yes these stories are very heart-crushing to see. Another young man will be missed and lost to us all. Sorry Aces, I thought I had edited my original comment to state that the photo was removed. Guess the editor outsmarted me on that one. Done now. Quote
Guest FourAces Posted December 8, 2011 Posted December 8, 2011 Sorry Aces, I thought I had edited my original comment to state that the photo was removed. Guess the editor outsmarted me on that one. Done now. OK but can I ask why? If its age he looks very young but is 18 well vetted works for video secrets been number one model about three months in a row now. Though any reason I can live with it just wanted you to know I would never post a pic of a underage guy intentionally. Quote
Guest Conway Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 .... or dressed up to look like one? I have more pics of him at my blog. Photo removed. I appreciate your enthusiasm for sharing but I'm not confortable with the age certainty of this person. I prefer to err on the conservative side with posts on this site. TY I think he's kind of creepy looking. Certainly not my cup of tea. Quote
Members Lucky Posted December 9, 2011 Members Posted December 9, 2011 OK but can I ask why? If its age he looks very young but is 18 well vetted works for video secrets been number one model about three months in a row now. Though any reason I can live with it just wanted you to know I would never post a pic of a underage guy intentionally. Lucky's Opinion Well, think of it this way. Most of us here, no doubt all of us, stay away from underage guys. And, we don't want people thinking we have that interest, either. So the website needs to keep a long arm when it comes to that sort of thing. Meaning, even if twinker there is over 18, we don't need any association with barely legal. I mean, why would we? It wouldn't do the site any good except to attract the wrong kind, and it might drive some of us away who don't want to be anywhere near the barely legal scene. As the porn forum...and your website, for that matter...show, there is no shortage of hot young guys of clear legal age who are willing to pose in the birthday suit God gave them. There's plenty there for all of us, and we don't need to add that added aura of barely legal to the mix. Now, of course, that's just my opinion. I am being clear on that. But you wanted a reason, and there is a reason there. Does your website get a lot of hits when a guy like him is featured? If so, I say good for you. We wouldn't want to take those hits away! Love, Lucky. This has been an expression of personal opinion. All rights reserved! Quote
Members TampaYankee Posted December 9, 2011 Members Posted December 9, 2011 Lucky's Opinion Well, think of it this way. Most of us here, no doubt all of us, stay away from underage guys. And, we don't want people thinking we have that interest, either. So the website needs to keep a long arm when it comes to that sort of thing. Meaning, even if twinker there is over 18, we don't need any association with barely legal. I mean, why would we? It wouldn't do the site any good except to attract the wrong kind, and it might drive some of us away who don't want to be anywhere near the barely legal scene. As the porn forum...and your website, for that matter...show, there is no shortage of hot young guys of clear legal age who are willing to pose in the birthday suit God gave them. There's plenty there for all of us, and we don't need to add that added aura of barely legal to the mix. This accurately reflects my feelings. I don't wish for the site to attract undesired participants or untoward scrutiny of law enforcement. Our desire and intent is to observe all laws with regard to child porn. Even if someone is of legal age, if he looks too young he may attract attention from those we do not wish to attract. We reserve the right to decline acceptance without satisfactory proof of age to offered directly to us. I admit that I made a decision before I realized he was on F4F. Would that have made a difference? Probably not. I also have to admit that I was creeped out by the photo. He looked as though he could be illegally young. It just seemed more prudent for us to direct people to your site, even if he was on F4F. Not only do we observe the laws, we wish to maintain the appearance that we do not accept content that appears of questionable age, even if there is reason to believe it is legal. As Lucky point out, there is more than enough legal content available to keep us awash in content. Quote
BiBottomBoy Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 The thing is the law can prosecute a site for posting an imagine of someone who appears to be underage even if they are not underage - if the site does not have the documentation on file themselves that he is of age. While Flirt For Free probably does have the documentation on this dude, Male Escort Review doesn't so they could get into legal trouble if they left the picture up. Quote
Guest FourAces Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 Lucky's Opinion Well, think of it this way. Most of us here, no doubt all of us, stay away from underage guys. And, we don't want people thinking we have that interest, either. So the website needs to keep a long arm when it comes to that sort of thing. Meaning, even if twinker there is over 18, we don't need any association with barely legal. I mean, why would we? It wouldn't do the site any good except to attract the wrong kind, and it might drive some of us away who don't want to be anywhere near the barely legal scene. As the porn forum...and your website, for that matter...show, there is no shortage of hot young guys of clear legal age who are willing to pose in the birthday suit God gave them. There's plenty there for all of us, and we don't need to add that added aura of barely legal to the mix. Now, of course, that's just my opinion. I am being clear on that. But you wanted a reason, and there is a reason there. Does your website get a lot of hits when a guy like him is featured? If so, I say good for you. We wouldn't want to take those hits away! Love, Lucky. This has been an expression of personal opinion. All rights reserved! Fair enough ... I do not disagree with what you wrote at all. I was just trying to have some fun by starting this thread. I have no doubt that the kid is legal but can see how his look is to the extreme of young and that might offend some or cause concern for others. On my blog I cater the a wide array of men ... so I often post things that do not interest me. Actually even though I do like my twinks I do not find William attractive. I think it was Conway who mentioned he looks a little creepy and I agree. I'll leave the pic posting to the pros like tomcal and well tomcal lol Quote
BiBottomBoy Posted December 11, 2011 Posted December 11, 2011 It is weird that in America you can let a 17 year old dude suck your cock, but can't take a picture of him doing so. Quote
Members TampaYankee Posted December 11, 2011 Members Posted December 11, 2011 It is weird that in America you can let a 17 year old dude suck your cock, but can't take a picture of him doing so. That is not my reading of the law. I suggest you investigate further unless you, youself, are near that same age. Quote
BiBottomBoy Posted December 11, 2011 Posted December 11, 2011 Well, I'm not in America so not a big deal. But the age of consent in France for gay sex is 15. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Europe#France This isn't really a big deal for me since I'm a bottom who likes older tops. Quote
