Guest zipperzone Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 I love the second picture. Guess I get off on being teased by just a glimpse of the buns. Reminder for everyone posting photos. Please read the Sharing Photos Guidelines post. Submitting photos is contingent upon following guidelines. A photo from one of the forbidden studios was removed. If in doubt then always err on conservative side by not posting. Thanks. TY Quote
Members Lucky Posted September 4, 2010 Members Posted September 4, 2010 He's pretty hot. I don't what to look at first- the butt or the face. Quote
Guest zipperzone Posted September 4, 2010 Posted September 4, 2010 I love the second picture. Guess I get off on being teased by just a glimpse of the buns. Reminder for everyone posting photos. Please read the Sharing Photos Guidelines post. Submitting photos is contingent upon following guidelines. A photo from one of the forbidden studios was removed. If in doubt then always err on conservative side by not posting. Thanks. TY TY: Sorry if I posted a no-no. I thought I was being careful not to post anything that could cause a problem. The pic you took down did not have a copyright noted on it and Corbin Fisher was not on the prohibited list you published. Could you please let me know where/how I did wrong so as to prevent me doing it again. I am ready to receive my public flogging. Will I be able to keep my underwear on? Quote
Members TampaYankee Posted September 4, 2010 Members Posted September 4, 2010 TY: Sorry if I posted a no-no. I thought I was being careful not to post anything that could cause a problem. The pic you took down did not have a copyright noted on it and Corbin Fisher was not on the prohibited list you published. Could you please let me know where/how I did wrong so as to prevent me doing it again. I am ready to receive my public flogging. Will I be able to keep my underwear on? I owe you an apology, zipper. You are correct that I had left Corbin Fisher off the list. (I have remedied.) I am astonished that I did, as they are one of the few studios foremost in my mind. One of their models listed a profile at another escort listing site using the Corbin model name and photos, both of which belong to Corbin Fisher. CF sued both the model/escort and the listing site. I believe they were looking for $50K in damages. On the positive side your post brought this issue to light which was sorely neeeded. As an aside to address potential questoins, that a copyright notice is not affixed does not forsake copyright claim. The model/photographer/studio, depending on agreements between them, implicitly retain copyright without having to mark the property explicitly. They can move to enforce it at will. The fact that a notice was not affixed may prove a mitigating factor in determining damages depending on the individual facts of the case, or if a case is actually brought. However, that is a factor for the trial judge or jury, after lawyers have been assembled, or maybe just with lawyers. The fact that a studio affixes it's name to it is clear indication that it views the photo as its property and a marketable resource. It is likely to want to protect that property to maintain the studio's unique position. However, studios often enter into affiliate agreements that permit sites to use their property under strict conditions as a matter of advertising. It benefits both the sites and the studio. This is why you see well-know studio photos or clips at other sites. Quote
Guest Matrix Posted September 4, 2010 Posted September 4, 2010 One of their models listed a profile at another escort listing site using the Corbin model name and photos, both of which belong to Corbin Fisher. CF sued both the model/escort and the listing site. I believe they were looking for $50K in damages. Actually the damages being sought were much higher. porn star escort sued by Corbin Fisher Quote
