BiBottomBoy Posted July 27, 2010 Posted July 27, 2010 Accidentally stuck this in the wrong forum the first time around. A military contractor is arguing in court that it was totally fine and legal for him to bill the U.S. Government for escorts. "His lawyers also defended the hiring of prostitutes for employees and board members, arguing in court papers that it represented a legitimate business expense "if Mr. Brooks thought such services could motivate his employees and make them more productive." Oh, really! http://gawker.com/5597566/body-armor-manufacturers-are-legally-entitled-to-hookers Quote
Members KYTOP Posted August 6, 2010 Members Posted August 6, 2010 Accidentally stuck this in the wrong forum the first time around. A military contractor is arguing in court that it was totally fine and legal for him to bill the U.S. Government for escorts. "His lawyers also defended the hiring of prostitutes for employees and board members, arguing in court papers that it represented a legitimate business expense "if Mr. Brooks thought such services could motivate his employees and make them more productive." Oh, really! http://gawker.com/5597566/body-armor-manufacturers-are-legally-entitled-to-hookers The ultimate stimulas program ? Quote
BiBottomBoy Posted August 6, 2010 Author Posted August 6, 2010 Revenge for being fucked by the government. Quote