Jump to content
TotallyOz

An Olive Branch to the Gay community from Obama?

Recommended Posts

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Obama will sign a memorandum Wednesday granting health care and other benefits to the same-sex partners of federal employees, two senior administration officials said.

The signing will take place in the Oval Office and follows sharp criticism of the president over a Justice Department motion filed last week in support of the Defense of Marriage Act -- which opposes same-sex marriage -- that used the government's interest in opposing incestuous marriages to support its position against same-sex marriage.

Gay and lesbian advocates have also faulted the Obama administration for not moving to repeal the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy that bars officials from asking about a service member's sexual orientation but also bars the service member from revealing it.

The president rankled gay advocates before his inauguration when he named megachurch pastor the Rev. Rick Warren to deliver the invocation at his swearing-in. Warren, in an interview with Belief.net, likened homosexuality to bestiality and incest. He also supported California's Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage in that state.

During the Warren controversy, Obama -- who frequently spoke in favor of gay and lesbian rights during the campaign but has said he opposes same-sex marriage -- declared himself "a fierce advocate for gay and lesbian Americans."

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/06/16...fits/index.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OZ, DADT doesn't bar military officials from grilling sevicemen about their sexual orientation. It only removes the line from the preinduction questionaire that asked if the inductee had homosexual inclinations. After that CID guys are free to hot box young and often not very well educated servicemen and women to obtain incriminating statements. I recently googled up the text of the act and, believe me, it's as rank a bit of homophobia as you're likely to find in a modern piece of legislation. It's fairly short; read it yourself.

At first I pursuaded myself that the incest brief was just internet gossip, but apparently it's true. That's embarrassing, both the brief and my belief Obama wouldn't allow that kind of argument to be used. Oh, well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...