TotallyOz Posted August 11, 2008 Posted August 11, 2008 It was suggested in the thread for the new version of the site that we remove clutter in the forums and have fewer forums. We currently have many forums here. We can: 1. Move some of the old forums into the forums we decide to keep and that will enable users to view and post on them. or 2. We can archive all of the older forums and have them as read only forums. or 3. Open to other options. So, which forums should we keep? Which ones should be move or archive? Any input or suggestions are much appreciated. Quote
Members TampaYankee Posted August 11, 2008 Members Posted August 11, 2008 The present plan, although not hard and fast, is to keep the Pub and Buffet and the Business Travel forums. Anything goes in the Pub, within policy guidelines, The Buffet remains focused on escorts. Please use this as the context for Oz's question OR make your own suggestions. Quote
Members Lucky Posted August 11, 2008 Members Posted August 11, 2008 Why not just make it a travel forum? There aren't that many escorts posting their travels, nor clients, so why not combine the two? We could use one separate forum for Oz to post his boyfriend pictures. Each day he could provide a guy of the day. No doubt it would take a while 'til he ran out of pix? Quote
AdamSmith Posted August 11, 2008 Posted August 11, 2008 Not to multiply entities needlessly, but the Hot Spots forum seems worth keeping on its own. Of course I just started using it for the first time, so not an impartial view here... Quote
Members TampaYankee Posted August 11, 2008 Members Posted August 11, 2008 Good start on the feedback. We need more of that. Thanks. But the nub of an issue Oz and I are facing is this: Do we lock several low or no use forums and archive them in a Read Only archive forum, with any new posts on topic going into the Pub or BUffet OR Do we nest present slow or no use forums inside Pub or Buffet, leave them active so more posts can be contributed. In the former case all action takes place in top level forums Pub and Buffet. In latter case you have forums inside of forums that will be active? Which is more desirable to you? Quote
Guest Scorpio Posted August 11, 2008 Posted August 11, 2008 Good start on the feedback. We need more of that. Thanks.But the nub of an issue Oz and I are facing is this: Do we lock several low or no use forums and archive them in a Read Only archive forum, with any new posts on topic going into the Pub or BUffet OR Do we nest present slow or no use forums inside Pub or Buffet, leave them active so more posts can be contributed. In the former case all action takes place in top level forums Pub and Buffet. In latter case you have forums inside of forums that will be active? Which is more desirable to you? I suggest a combination of these two idea. Move the present slow or no use forums to a new catch all forum, but let them remain active forums. Suggested title: The Leftovers (in keeping with The Pub and The Buffet theme). Then if they are still slow moving or inactive, then archive them. Or do what we all do with unwanted leftovers, throw them out. Quote
Members TampaYankee Posted August 11, 2008 Members Posted August 11, 2008 Then if they are still slow moving or inactive, then archive them. Or do what we all do with unwanted leftovers, throw them out. Nothing ever gets thrown out, just moved to the back of the fridge where it can grow at its own pace in peace. Quote
Members Lucky Posted August 11, 2008 Members Posted August 11, 2008 I vote to archive for read only. Quote
Guest EurythmicThrust Posted August 11, 2008 Posted August 11, 2008 Agree with Scorpio's idea...but can the "Leftovers" be microwaved after being taken out of the freezer (archive)? Quote
Members JKane Posted August 12, 2008 Members Posted August 12, 2008 Just lost a long message for the second fucking time because the page refreshed or something (for the f4f ad?) and focus changed from the input window to the browser in general, making backspace deadly... Quote
BiBottomBoy Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 I just want to say that I just signed up today and I like the way the forum works. I'm still figuring things out but the breakdown makes sense - and seems to filter things well. Quote
Guest StuCotts Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 I just want to say that I just signed up today and I like the way the forum works.I'm still figuring things out but the breakdown makes sense - and seems to filter things well. Welcome to a new voice. Quote
Guest StuCotts Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 For what it's worth, my purely subjective take. Hot Spots -- Couldn't it be folded into the Pub? Craigslist, etc. -- I've seen enough about CL on the Pub to make me wonder if this separate forum is necessary. Business Class Travel -- Wouldn't these notifications benefit the escorts more by getting more attention in the Pub, or maybe preferably in the Buffet? Leisure Class Travel -- Seems to have already self-destructed. European Men -- Escorts are escorts. I don't know that the European ones need their own forum. Latin American Men -- Same. A-List Men -- Don't understand the premise, i.e., whether the A-listers are clients or escorts. In either case, on what basis are we to tell the a-listers from hoi polloi? Beyond Vanilla -- Fetishes are fun to indulge. I love my own. But they're so hard to discuss interestingly, even the far-out ones, e.g., chapped lips. On whether to retain the forum in its present form I'd have to rely on how much of a kick the contributors say it provides them. Quote
BiBottomBoy Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 For what it's worth, my purely subjective take.Hot Spots -- Couldn't it be folded into the Pub? Craigslist, etc. -- I've seen enough about CL on the Pub to make me wonder if this separate forum is necessary. Business Class Travel -- Wouldn't these notifications benefit the escorts more by getting more attention in the Pub, or maybe preferably in the Buffet? Leisure Class Travel -- Seems to have already self-destructed. European Men -- Escorts are escorts. I don't know that the European ones need their own forum. Latin American Men -- Same. A-List Men -- Don't understand the premise, i.e., whether the A-listers are clients or escorts. In either case, on what basis are we to tell the a-listers from hoi polloi? Beyond Vanilla -- Fetishes are fun to indulge. I love my own. But they're so hard to discuss interestingly, even the far-out ones, e.g., chapped lips. On whether to retain the forum in its present form I'd have to rely on how much of a kick the contributors say it provides them. I bet we could have some fun with fetishes. Here's my take - while this is an escort site, why the fuck do we have to only talk about escorts. We all like the cock - whether it's pay for gay or just gay for play so why not have as much shit as possible to talk about. EU dudes are different from US dudes and there are lot of men who like to add some spice to their vice. The leisure forum does seem empty - but fuck it, someone may get into it. It's not like there are so many forums that it's confusing. So far, I'm having fun with it. It's all about rocking on with our cock on after all. Quote
Guest StuCotts Posted August 13, 2008 Posted August 13, 2008 EU dudes are different from US dudes and there are lot of men who like to add some spice to their vice. Different? How so? Quote
BiBottomBoy Posted August 13, 2008 Posted August 13, 2008 Different? How so? For one - nearly 100 percent foreskin ratio. For two - way different attitude. Much kinkier in the bedroom, but much more distant and closeted when not in the bars or in your pad. For three - Much, much more into gender role playing. The distinction between top and bottom is much, much more defined and there are considerably less "versatile" boys. For four - They are considerably better about safe sex and your odds of a guy stealthing you are much rarer. On the other hand, they tend to jump into the shower to clean off within seconds after sex which I find a huge turn off. For five - they are either much, much cuter than American dudes or much, much less cute. This is because they tend to be purebreds, while us American dudes are mutts. So we create many more average dudes, and they hit harder ends of the spectrum. For six - They get tested a lot more often than american dudes do - mostly because it's free. For seven - Often, very, very very bad haircuts. Quote
TotallyOz Posted August 14, 2008 Author Posted August 14, 2008 For five - they are either much, much cuter than American dudes or much, much less cute. This is because they tend to be purebreds, while us American dudes are mutts. So we create many more average dudes, and they hit harder ends of the spectrum. Well, this is one theory I have not heard before but it sounds logical to me. Just a trip to Czech Republic for a month and I am sold on the idea. Or, the beautiful Spanish boys in Barcelona. Quote
BiBottomBoy Posted August 14, 2008 Posted August 14, 2008 Well, this is one theory I have not heard before but it sounds logical to me. Just a trip to Czech Republic for a month and I am sold on the idea. Or, the beautiful Spanish boys in Barcelona. The Barcelona boys are the cutest things in the world - and the selection of tops is much bigger percentage wise than anywhere I've ever seen. Sometimes when I'm in New York I feel like there are nothing but bottoms. Quote
TotallyOz Posted August 14, 2008 Author Posted August 14, 2008 Sometimes when I'm in New York I feel like there are nothing but bottoms. No wonder I love NY so much. But, also the boys in NYC are often meth heads and they party so much that bottoming is easier for them. Also some are just so sexual that anything is good for them. I find the more sex I have the easier it is for me to bottom. Or, perhaps I am just easy. Quote
Members TampaYankee Posted August 14, 2008 Members Posted August 14, 2008 For one - nearly 100 percent foreskin ratio. For two - way different attitude. Much kinkier in the bedroom, but much more distant and closeted when not in the bars or in your pad. For three - Much, much more into gender role playing. The distinction between top and bottom is much, much more defined and there are considerably less "versatile" boys. For four - They are considerably better about safe sex and your odds of a guy stealthing you are much rarer. On the other hand, they tend to jump into the shower to clean off within seconds after sex which I find a huge turn off. For five - they are either much, much cuter than American dudes or much, much less cute. This is because they tend to be purebreds, while us American dudes are mutts. So we create many more average dudes, and they hit harder ends of the spectrum. For six - They get tested a lot more often than american dudes do - mostly because it's free. For seven - Often, very, very very bad haircuts. Interesting perspecitve. Thanks for sharing. Would you say these hold for the UK dudes as much as for the continental boys? Quote
Members TampaYankee Posted August 14, 2008 Members Posted August 14, 2008 The Barcelona boys are the cutest things in the world - and the selection of tops is much bigger percentage wise than anywhere I've ever seen. It's that Spanish macho thing. They have it bad. Worse than an STD, it was transmitted widely in Latin America during colonization. But when you find a bottom, he's ususally a pig in heat. Or is that my fantasy. Sometimes when I'm in New York I feel like there are nothing but bottoms. Surprised to hear that wilth all the Black and Rican total tops advertising. Maybe they only give it away? Quote
TotallyOz Posted August 14, 2008 Author Posted August 14, 2008 Interesting perspecitve. Thanks for sharing. I enjoyed.Would you say these hold for the UK dudes as much as for the continental boys? I am interested in to see if this holds true for the UK boys. I do know they are all uncut. And, I have yet to meet a Scottish lad I didn't like. Perhaps it is the accent. Plus, I find the young Prince of England hot in the kilt. Quote
TotallyOz Posted August 14, 2008 Author Posted August 14, 2008 It's that Spanish macho thing. They have it bad. Worse than an STD, it was transmitted widely in Latin America during colonization. But when you find a bottom, he's ususally a pig in heat. Or is that my fantasy. Surprised to hear that wilth all the Black and Rican total tops advertising. Maybe they only give it away? Well, most of those that are advertising are big boys. If you get a black or PR twink, they are usually versatile or bottoms. Many will say they are tops but when it comes to push and shove, they want to bend over. At least that was true from my Craig's List experience. Quote
BiBottomBoy Posted August 14, 2008 Posted August 14, 2008 No wonder I love NY so much. But, also the boys in NYC are often meth heads and they party so much that bottoming is easier for them. Also some are just so sexual that anything is good for them. I find the more sex I have the easier it is for me to bottom. Or, perhaps I am just easy. Yeah, the amount of Tina in New York is astounding. My problem with New York is that I find it very hard to find a top. I'm the rare bi boy that has no interest at all in topping a guy (not even sure I could do it) so I find the amount of competition for the few available tops to be fierce. It's the opposite in France. Culturally French dudes don't consider themselves "Gay" if they only top which means that there are a lot more tops because even horny bicurious dudes are willing to do it - which is a very,very good thing for me. The conundrum, however, is that the NYC guys are hotter than the French, who have a tendency to be somewhat underendowed. That's helpful for anal, but not so much for oral. I mean how can I deep throat if it's not even long enough to get past the end of my tongue? Quote
Members TampaYankee Posted August 14, 2008 Members Posted August 14, 2008 Just lost a long message for the second fucking time because the page refreshed or something (for the f4f ad?) and focus changed from the input window to the browser in general, making backspace deadly... Ughhhh..... I have never experienced that one. I'd be pissed too. Which browser? Quote