Members flguy Posted March 5, 2008 Members Posted March 5, 2008 The biggest problem with Daddy's seems to lie in taking up to 3 months to post a review, or submitted reviews never getting posted, or trying to submit reviews numerous times only to lose everything in the process. This site is TIMELY, as HooBoy used to be. Quote
Members TownsendPLocke Posted March 5, 2008 Members Posted March 5, 2008 Chillmaster01 if you would have taken as much time posting a few more details in your review(as you have done in your past reviews)as you have in two of your posts so far in this thread it probably would not have been kicked back to you for revision. I thank TY for NOT publishing the sort of lame non helpful reviews that have been polluting "the other site:for a while now. Take a clue from your handle and chill Quote
Guest chillmaster01 Posted March 5, 2008 Posted March 5, 2008 Chillmaster01 if you would have taken as much time posting a few more details in your review(as you have done in your past reviews)as you have in two of your posts so far in this thread it probably would not have been kicked back to you for revision.I thank TY for NOT publishing the sort of lame non helpful reviews that have been polluting "the other site:for a while now. Take a clue from your handle and chill If I felt I had more pertinent details I would have written them in first place. I feel all data I felt about this current hire was protrayed in the review I wrote. Reviews I have previously written I had more details due to extended stay and activities we got into or in case of bad reviews things I disliked. It is like what TY said "what can you write about a massage or muscle worship" this wasn't a very entailed session. We didn't do a whole lot as time constraints and I didn't experience that much with him. I wouldn't want this to be protrayed negatively on him as he was more than willing to take the time and also he was more than willing and cool with doing almost anything I wanted. However it didn't happen because of time and me. I wanted to see him to see if he was someone I was compatible with as I wanted someone to travel with in this area and was more interested in his personality than anything sexual. Yes there was a little oral and yes he did get off and was very intimate but it was a very short session and not a whole lot of details to write about. Yes I wrote he is well endowed, mostly a bottom, light kisser, and really gets into ass play. Other than items related to his personality there is nothing further to say. I also commented about his personality that it was great and I will again see him but in a much lengthier stay. The review was not a one liner it was honest and was as much as I experienced and should have been published. The decision to not publish is only a hurt to him and not me as I have received prior to seeing him inquiries as to if I ever seen him and also it was a 411 on this message forum. So I felt not waiting till next session was in best interest of the parties on here due to interest expressed and I did like him very much and am going to see him this weekend . I respect that the owners of site determine the rules and while I may continue using the Forum I will not bother writing reviews or reading reviews that I think are manipulated or editied to make them appear as National Enquire Articles. I want to hear truth whether good or bad and I don't need to know how deep someone was able to penetrate to determine if they fit my needs. I guess I feel it would be different if I was a first time reviewer and/or was a constant person that they didn't like content of reviews. I have written many reviews and am actually someone that may even write too many details as I write even too much on this message forum. Quote
TotallyOz Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 I respect that the owners of site determine the rules and while I may continue using the Forum I will not bother writing reviews or reading reviews that I think are manipulated or editied to make them appear as National Inquire Articles. I want to hear truth whether good or bad and I don't need to know how deep someone was able to penetrate to determine if they fit my needs. We don't want reviews to appear as National Enquirer articles. Honestly, that is not the case. Some of mine perhaps appear that way but that is because I much prefer the Enquirer to the Wall Street Journal. I tend to read what I can understand and have never really been able to comprehend the WSJ. I do hope that you continue to use the forums and actively participate here. I also hope that you give writing reviews more of a chance. It was nothing personal I assure you. TY does not operate that way. You contributions are valuable and I hope that one day you will realize that we did not mean to insult you or alienate you. On the contrary, we just wanted more detail in the review. That detail did not have to be sensationalized for the readers sake. It was that more detail was needed to make a better judgement for all that read the review. Quote
Guest chillmaster01 Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 We don't want reviews to appear as National Enquirer articles. Honestly, that is not the case. Some of mine perhaps appear that way but that is because I much prefer the Enquirer to the Wall Street Journal. I tend to read what I can understand and have never really been able to comprehend the WSJ. I do hope that you continue to use the forums and actively participate here. I also hope that you give writing reviews more of a chance. It was nothing personal I assure you. TY does not operate that way. You contributions are valuable and I hope that one day you will realize that we did not mean to insult you or alienate you. On the contrary, we just wanted more detail in the review. That detail did not have to be sensationalized for the readers sake. It was that more detail was needed to make a better judgement for all that read the review. I am sure to use Forum or at least express my opinion but I stand by my review as being complete and accurate based upon my session at that time. I do not believe it could have been more detailed but that again is my opinion. I published same review on Daddys and even based upon this forum I have received many private request for information on Noah and he called me last night and thanked me for the inquiries and compliments I have given him. Quote
AdamSmith Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 We don't want reviews to appear as National Enquirer articles. Speak for yourself! Seriously, just to agree with those who find details of the physical action essential. My own reviews can get clotted with the gauzy lyrical atmospherics, which I hope communicate something useful about the encounter. But one also tries to give some idea of how and when knob A was inserted in hole B. Without that, how could anyone guess whether their experience with the guy might feel anything like mine? Quote
Guest chillmaster01 Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 Speak for yourself! Seriously, just to agree with those who find details of the physical action essential. My own reviews can get clotted with the gauzy lyrical atmospherics, which I hope communicate something useful about the encounter. But one also tries to give some idea of how and when knob A was inserted in hole B. Without that, how could anyone guess whether their experience with the guy might feel anything like mine? Good one!!!!!!!!!! Quote
