Members TownsendPLocke Posted April 16, 2007 Members Posted April 16, 2007 According to Jason Curious David Forrest is back in the pokey again-this time for possesion. Smells like a set up job to me-but it really could not happen to a more deserving guy. http://www.jasoncurious.com/desk/2007/04/d...sted-again.html Hope those of you who were looking to use his "introduction"service don't have to much to lose by your personal information being dumped into court records-happened when he was prosocuted for running"Brad's Buddies" a few years ago. Quote
Guest Texndoc Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 I'd rather give some stranger on the street my credit card number that ever trust this con with it. I've always been of the opinion he might have had some power back in the 80s but the internet absolutely rendered him useless. LOL, most of his "ForestMen" can easily be "Googled" and it's a good bet you'll find them on "myspace". LOL again - wonder if in his spare time (and he seems to have a lot of it) he whines and cries that they take their personal pages down? I visited his "Forestmen" page the other night (steered there by another thread here) and he's got 10-15 year old pictures of straight porn stars "Hakan" and "Julian" posted. Neither of whom has even done any hetero porn work in years, and both, from what I've read on internet gossip boards, are on marriages 2 or 3. And being an early "Hakan" fan, I remember reading he was a Turk, living in Germany, and never an American citizen. Everything David Forest screams "HUCKSTER" a mile away. Quote
Guest ODD Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 >According to Jason Curious David Forrest is back in the pokey >again-this time for possesion. >Smells like a set up job to me-but it really could not happen >to a more deserving guy. Can you give us specifics on why you state this "could not happen to a more deserving guy?" I take it you actually know more about David than what you read by your statement. I've known David and don't ever recall your name coming up in general conversation or seen you at any functions he has held. Maybe we just keep missing each other. But regardless your statement about David is pretty strong suggesting you have some insight ... or is i t you just enjoy playing judge and jury about everything? Face the reality ... lets hear why you know this fate couldn't be assigned to someone more deserving. Quote
Guest Texndoc Posted April 17, 2007 Posted April 17, 2007 >>I've known David and don't ever recall your name coming up in general conversation >>or seen you at any functions he has held. Maybe we just keep missing each other. On another site, David was hyping his "Meet The Stars" program on the anniversary of 9-11 with a "special offer" - some of the money sent to him was going to some family of some victim of 9-11 (and he had mom and pop's name) IF you acted in a hurry and sent him the money NOW.....turns out there was no such family (oh, as I recall, it was some mourning bereaved Jewish couple) and the proof was he had to apologize over and over and over for his lie......Has that ever come up "in general conversation" or been talked about at "any functions"? (I have to admit my favorite "after" apology-post was him going to a synagogue to "reflect" on his life after his bad deed - one thing great about this shyster - he's never boring) Quote
Members TownsendPLocke Posted April 17, 2007 Author Members Posted April 17, 2007 >>According to Jason Curious David Forrest is back in the >pokey >>again-this time for possesion. >>Smells like a set up job to me-but it really could not >happen >>to a more deserving guy. > >Can you give us specifics on why you state this "could >not happen to a more deserving guy?" I take it you >actually know more about David than what you read by your >statement. Unlike some of the fellas here,I do not have to get to close to a piece of shit to know to keep away from it. > >I've known David and don't ever recall your name coming up in >general conversation or seen you at any functions he has held. >Maybe we just keep missing each other. My handle is a psuedonym son-as are most folks handles here.So you have no way of knowing whether I have met/done buisness with Forrest in the past,but just for clarification-I have not done buisness with him-I have met him-see the shit reference above. > >But regardless your statement about David is pretty strong >suggesting you have some insight ... or is i t you just enjoy >playing judge and jury about everything? Not evrything,just on folks like this > >Face the reality ... lets hear why you know this fate couldn't >be assigned to someone more deserving. Please see my other post-and Texdoc's statements as well Quote
Guest eastburbguy Posted April 18, 2007 Posted April 18, 2007 Isn't it ODD that ODD doesn't have a "Member since date" below his handle? Quote
Guest twinklover Posted April 18, 2007 Posted April 18, 2007 Good observation. I know rhe strong feelings that emanate whenever his name his mentioned. Witness the threads on Atkol and I have always stood by him there. I like David. I don't give a fuck what others may think or their axes to grind against him. He's such a convenient whipping boy but he's also the most infamous and important gay porn/escort agent EVER. EVER. No one compares to him. PERIOD I've never used his services yet professionally. I have merely been an internet friend. But I must add this, a person I do know and trust could deal with David, the old desert agent, Peter Scott. And if Peter is not on here shitting on David Forest, then I won't either. And Peter Scott is right up there with David. In another life, I might be working for the both of them in the world's best gay porn studio and escort agency. We could tear it all up. The comments of others are noted. Quote
Guest Texndoc Posted April 18, 2007 Posted April 18, 2007 >>but he's also the most infamous and important gay porn/escort agent EVER. EVER. To put things in perspective, I know from a friend-of-a-friend "Peter Scott" ended up driving a cab in Vegas, with no health insurance and a new diagnosis of diabetes. And I just read last night on "the other" forum David Forest was allegedly trolling for sex on the internet in exchange for drugs. Not money, drugs. Money costs money, I suppose. I'll take my life, EVER, much more dull* as it is. But let's not romanticize theirs. * Damn, I've never been to prison ONCE, and here's Forest on his third (that we know of) go-round Quote
Members Lucky Posted April 19, 2007 Members Posted April 19, 2007 Well, if it is a "set-up job" then no one should be taking delight in it despite any feelings towards the person arrested. A malfeasance of justice is bad for all of us no matter whom it affects the most directly. Even if not a set-up job, I am disturbed by how quickly we lose the presumption of innocence in these times. Having said all of that, I do understand that these matters notwithstanding many people have negative feelings towards Mr. Forest. And management here has not yet explained that very ODD posting in his defense. Are there separate rules for friends of David? Quote
TotallyOz Posted April 19, 2007 Posted April 19, 2007 Not much to explain other than it is an anomaly. We are not sure how it happened but are looking into it. DCForum is not as stable as other forum boards. We are looking to move to a new format in the coming months. I hope that helps explain the ODD posting. Quote
Guest FourAces Posted April 23, 2007 Posted April 23, 2007 I knew David in his music years and ran into him a few times after that. He definitely is not a person with the highest morals however either are those who judge people they only read about and do not know personally ... like you Towny. I hope one day David can find the happiness he has so desperately been looking for all these years. Quote
Members TownsendPLocke Posted April 24, 2007 Author Members Posted April 24, 2007 Again-from my post above,, "Unlike some of the fellas here,I do not have to get to close to a piece of shit to know to keep away from it" But of course there are some peices of shit that have been hidden from my sight that I have gotten kinda close to,to the point of considering them to be friends-but eventually the smell came through and I could see that they truley were pieces of shit-and as such it was best to avoid them in the future. Quote
Guest FourAces Posted April 29, 2007 Posted April 29, 2007 >Again-from my post above,, >"Unlike some of the fellas here,I do not have to get to >close to a piece of shit to know to keep away from it" >But of course there are some peices of shit that have been >hidden from my sight that I have gotten kinda close to,to the >point of considering them to be friends-but eventually the >smell came through and I could see that they truley were >pieces of shit-and as such it was best to avoid them in the >future. Seems to me that you might have some really deep seeded personal issues Towny. You claim to be able to make judgment on people that you really only read about. You apparently have issues selecting friends based on what you write above. You obviously have a scat fetish that isn't really healthy to have. I'm just glad you don't decide things other than for yourself. To have you on a jury would be mis-justice at its worse. Quote
