Guest twinklover Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 I followed this saga from the start. Bryan's murder makes this even more bizarre. We're probably in for a few more salacious surprises as the murder is solved. Someone should make a movie about this. I doubt Brett Corrigan was involved but we'll see. Jason Curious reported that Bryan and Brett Corrigan were seen at Krave in early January and were rumored to have reached a settlement. That doesn't surprise me. People in the gay porn and escort business have had the most vicious feuds over the years and then kissed and made up. I wish I had $20 for everytime someone has feuded with David Forest and then kissed and hugged him. Who knows. Maybe one day riptide will give SA a peck on the cheeks.
Members seaboy4hire Posted January 26, 2007 Members Posted January 26, 2007 >I followed this saga from the start. Bryan's murder makes >this even more bizarre. We're probably in for a few more >salacious surprises as the murder is solved. Someone should >make a movie about this. > I'd pass on the movie and go for a full time soap oprah. Hugs, Greg
Guest Riptide Posted January 30, 2007 Posted January 30, 2007 This latest info gets as ugly as as one might have suspected this to get. There are some, online, suggesting that Brent Corrigan's arrest is only hours away as having a role in this but perhaps not the bloody hand. I'd rather just think that as with all murders, time and good detective work will find those involved, and, provide the justice their acts deserve. This is so creeepy I almost want to puke. http://www.timesleader.com:80/mld/timesleader/16573399.htm
Guest ScottAdler Posted January 30, 2007 Posted January 30, 2007 >I doubt Brett Corrigan was involved but we'll see. Jason >Curious reported that Bryan and Brett Corrigan were seen at >Krave in early January and were rumored to have reached a >settlement. That doesn't surprise me. People in the gay porn >and escort business have had the most vicious feuds over the >years and then kissed and made up. Having had coffee with Brent here in WeHo in the last couple days and spending the evening in said cabanna with him, Chi Chi and Bryan at Hustlaball I'm definitely in the camp that says it wasn't him. The gay can be vindictive and mean but physical just isn't typically our style. Combine that with the small stature of Brett and I don't see him stabbing and setting fire to anyone or anything.
Members seaboy4hire Posted January 30, 2007 Members Posted January 30, 2007 >>I doubt Brett Corrigan was involved but we'll see. Jason >>Curious reported that Bryan and Brett Corrigan were seen >at >>Krave in early January and were rumored to have reached a >>settlement. That doesn't surprise me. People in the gay >porn >>and escort business have had the most vicious feuds over >the >>years and then kissed and made up. > >Having had coffee with Brett here in WeHo in the last couple >days and spending the evening in said cabanna with him, Chi >Chi and Bryan at Hustlaball I'm definitely in the camp that >says it wasn't him. > >The gay can be vindictive and mean but physical just isn't >typically our style. Combine that with the small stature of >Brett and I don't see him stabbing and setting fire to anyone >or anything. Just because you had coffee or hung out with someone at some party doesn't mean you know exactly is going through a persons mind. I'm not saying he is guilty but best to keep all options open. Hugs, Greg
Guest Riptide Posted January 30, 2007 Posted January 30, 2007 >The gay can be vindictive and mean Please pookie, tell me you didn't mean that as it sounded...... Nevertheless, I'm giving you some wiggle room here, but "The gay?" I'm sure it was just a bad choice of words, like disgusting..... Anyway, the reports to date state, from evidence and the violence of the scene, that the killer would be between 30-40 years old based upon required size and strength of the killer and his actions. It's good, and bad I suspect, to know that you Scott, have had first hand communication and knowledge of where Brent was and what he was doing from your personal communications with him during the time of the murder, from Brent. I just hope that you Scott, have not now implicated yourself in some manner publicly, that of which Brent has yet to say ANYTHING publicly about on his website blog or elsewhere based upon legal advise from his attorney to his possible involvement. Has your legal education failed you Scott before it even has gotten started? Scotty, Hello? How could you even put yourself in this public disclosure of communication with a prime suspect in a brutal murder? Prudence to me, in this horrible situation, would be for Scott to just shut up and let the facts play out as they will thru the authorities without his public disclosure of communication with a prime person of interest in this case. Choosing to associate yourself Scott, with an obvious suspect publicly, is just foolhardy and idiotic. What would your folks think when it goes prime time? Pookie, if Brent has elected to keep his mouth shut to this point publicly, which he has, should you too not follow suit? Your remarks could very well take you to a place you never would want to be, just by association..... Pookie, shut the fuck up and focus on negotiating rates. I'd rather see you do that then defend yourself in a court which you have no experience in and carries potential jail time......
Members seaboy4hire Posted January 30, 2007 Members Posted January 30, 2007 And when has Scott really kept quiet? Sorry couldn't help going there. Hugs, Greg
Guest ScottAdler Posted January 30, 2007 Posted January 30, 2007 >Just because you had coffee or hung out with someone at some party >doesn't mean you know exactly is going through a persons mind. I'm >not saying he is guilty but best to keep all options open. I never said I knew exactly what is going through his mind. I'm just saying is that I personally was there and witnessed their demeanor when interacting with each other and they really seemed to have kissed and made up ... like another poster mentioned. I'm saying we had coffee and he wasn't talking about it but he obviously knew the situation looked bad and I was commenting that he didn't seem like he was dealing with a guilty conscience. >>The gay can be vindictive and mean >Nevertheless, I'm giving you some wiggle room here, but >"The gay?" No I meant the gay. It was a subtle anthropological jab at our culture and the ever popular premise of eating our own. Think Margaret ####, “is he ‘the gay?’” I’m obviously saying anything about gays in general or making blanket statements – just making a joke to say that most gays in this industry would rather settle something via backstapping meangirls behavior rather than assault. >Anyway, the reports to date state, from evidence and the >violence of the scene, that the killer would be between 30-40 >years old based upon required size and strength of the killer >and his actions. OK so what problems do you have with my opinion and commentary that his small stature probably couldn’t have accomplished the actions of the murderer or were you just trying to start a bitch fit for a change? >It's good, and bad I suspect, to know that you Scott, have had >first hand communication and knowledge of where Brent was and >what he was doing from your personal communications with him >during the time of the murder, from Brent. I just hope that >you Scott, have not now implicated yourself in some manner >publicly, that of which Brent has yet to say ANYTHING publicly >about on his website blog or elsewhere based upon legal advise >from his attorney to his possible involvement. Has your legal >education failed you Scott before it even has gotten started? >Scotty, Hello? How could you even put yourself in this public >disclosure of communication with a prime suspect in a brutal >murder? Uh wow … put down the crack pipe and read what I wrote. It was an opinion based on my dealings with him that he doesn’t seem like the type to commit murder. I thought everyone was entitled to an opinion around here > >Prudence to me, in this horrible situation, would be for >Scott to just shut up and let the facts play out as they will >thru the authorities without his public disclosure of >communication with a prime person of interest in this case. >Choosing to associate yourself Scott, with an obvious suspect >publicly, is just foolhardy and idiotic. What would your folks >think when it goes prime time? I’m sorry Rip … I didn’t realize I had to explain this concept to you. friend (frěnd) n. 1. A person whom one knows, likes, and trusts. 2. A person whom one knows; an acquaintance. 3. A person with whom one is allied in a struggle or cause; a comrade. 4. One who supports, sympathizes with, or patronizes a group, cause, or movement: friends of the clean air movement. 5. Friend A member of the Society of Friends; a Quaker. Some people have friends with whom they speak with on occasion when they leave their homes and computer screens. They’re not together 24/7 but they have occasion to spend time together and enjoy each other’s company. >Pookie, if Brent has elected to keep his mouth shut to this >point publicly, which he has, should you too not follow suit? >Your remarks could very well take you to a place you never >would want to be, just by association..... Wow … if you’re classifying coffee as guilty by association then every episode of Law & Order would be a three hour epic for the detectives to interview every casual same time same place coincidence coffee date as a potential suspect. I love how you can take a simple opinion on a topic that was COMPLETELY NON CONFRONTATIONAL and stir the shit into a meal of drama for yourself. Calm down, seriously. Even this is too much for you muffin
Guest Riptide Posted January 30, 2007 Posted January 30, 2007 With all due respect to you Scott, you're a fucking asshole if you can't see how your post murder association with a prime suspect, then public acknowlegement of that can pull you into the bigger picture of a criminal investigation. Are you soooo stupid as to think if you were only questioned, that only your background would not be investigated? Are you sooo stupid that when you are investigated that you can't understand that everyone you have ever seen of late will be investigated as well? Are you so unbelievably stupid, that you would not just shut up about your public association with a prime time suspect for murder, simply because you want the world to know that you are in the mix? You are Scott, an idiot for making public this information. Not only are you an idiot, but you put at risk every client you have ever seen should the Feds choose to seize your personal property for investigative means simply by association. It happens every day. Are you really this desperate for publicity that you need to cash in on this murder investigation? You are truly, Scott, the biggest fool I have ever witnessed publicly on any site anywhere.
Members TownsendPLocke Posted January 30, 2007 Members Posted January 30, 2007 Having met Brett Corrigan I just can't see HOW he could be implicated in any way in this-the kid is just not that type-he really is a sweet and very sexy young kid, I sure hope this does not screw up his career. I have met murderers,I have met lots of psychopaths,I have met tons of crazies,speed freeks,drunks and evil hustlers who have hurt-killed johns. I got no evil vibe of of Brent at all. And PS-just so y'all know-I was at the hustlaball party and Scott was most definatly there-in the VIP,and clocking lots of time with lots of cute boys inculuding Brent
Guest Riptide Posted January 30, 2007 Posted January 30, 2007 >Having met Brett Corrigan I just can't see HOW he could be >implicated in any way in this-the kid is just not that type-he >really is a sweet and very sexy young kid, >I sure hope this does not screw up his career. Jesus fucking Christ Towny, It's one thing to have met someone but to make a blanket statement like your's is just like the next door neighbors say about their neighbor when he is arrested for multiple murders. I, like you DO NOT want to believe for a nano-second that Brett is involved here, but I, unlike you, am not willing to put my credibility on the line and say that he isn't. I'd just rather form no opinion at all and let the evidence point the way. >I have met murderers,I have met lots of psychopaths,I have met >tons of crazies,speed freeks,drunks and evil hustlers who have >hurt-killed johns. Wow Towny, remind me to never never hang in your circle. >I got no evil vibe of of Brent at all. So would the victims of Jeffrey Dahmer say, If they only could. Vibe equals nothing when it comes to someone's potential for madness. >And PS-just so y'all know-I was at the hustlaball party and >Scott was most definatly there-in the VIP,and clocking lots >of time with lots of cute boys inculuding Brent And so Towny, you conclude with the most important piece of information any could want....Scott was being a party boy at a hustler party in Las Vegas. Now, if I were to ever call a witness, he'd be the first on my list.........
Guest ScottAdler Posted January 30, 2007 Posted January 30, 2007 :: for a change your slippery slope argument has no merit but feel free to drop off that anonymous tip to the cops which I'm sure you're salivating at the chance to do. Get a life.
Members Lucky Posted January 30, 2007 Members Posted January 30, 2007 This was riptide yesterday: First off, I’d like to personally apologize to everyone and anyone who read my last posted remarks within this thread. The language of which I used horrifies me a day later. Calling someone a stupid mother fucker to convey a thought of reasoning, discredits my point of view with no ability to rebound from. I’m working on that. Sometimes, I need to chill, before I post. The reason I say that is because I never got around to sharing why my inappropriate use of words set me off they way they did, and quite frankly, had I done that, would still hold no value for it anyway. I don’t believe for a moment that Scott Adler is a bad person. But today he really lets one rip. Scott is now nearly an accessory to murder and a "fucking asshole"! Wow. The tides can really change in a day!
Guest ScottAdler Posted January 30, 2007 Posted January 30, 2007 LOL there's that second horseman of the apocalypse! First RockHard now Lucky being nice to me? Hee hee Thanks babe for pointing that one out How is Palm Springs in February?
Members Lucky Posted January 30, 2007 Members Posted January 30, 2007 "How is Palm Springs in February?" Well, I don't know yet, but ask me in a few days! Or better yet, come to our killer party on the 17th!
Guest ScottAdler Posted January 30, 2007 Posted January 30, 2007 I was hinting at that What are the exact dates ... about to post my travel hell over the next month or so. Get home from Vegas the 15th of Feb and l leave for SF on the 23rd but this appears to fall within the lines perfectly.
Guest Barry Posted January 30, 2007 Posted January 30, 2007 Your responses have moved over the line here. As the OP, I loosely assume you were looking for opinions and thoughts, yet attack both.
Guest RR Posted January 30, 2007 Posted January 30, 2007 Like I said in a post a few days ago, why must we all bitch and attack here! Let's all kiss and make up for good or agree to put differences aside on this message board. Being in my chosen profession I can tell you that this thread and the comments made by SA do not implicate him. He is not quilty by association and the fact of the matter is he was just commenting on the state of mind of a person at a particular event. Public comment, we all do it far to often but that is the nature of the human. We like to put our 2 cents in. Public comment to that effect would not lead him to be a murder suspect or guilty by association. To think that his computer would be seized for what he said is ridiculious. He was a higher chance of it being seized for his chosen temporary career path then anything else. Perhaps he might be called a character witness, but nothing more. Riptide, I agree get a life and bitch and fight with SA somewhere else please. What good does this thread do the purpose of the site? RussianRob
Guest twinklover Posted January 30, 2007 Posted January 30, 2007 Now that "all that" has been excreted out of our systems, I hope we continue to post new facts and speculation here as this story unfolds. That includes official news links and WEHO gossip and innuendo. One account speculated that the perpetrator may be in his 30s or 40s and relatively big and strong. That would rule out Brett but not others associated with him. Hmmm. It should be an easy matter to determine whether potential suspects have an alibi, i.e., where were they when the murder occurred? If there is an alibi, then the only issue would be whether this was a murder for hire. Murder for hire seems doubtful to me, given the sloppiness of 28 or 29 stab wounds and the evidence of a missing or stolen car.
Guest Riptide Posted January 31, 2007 Posted January 31, 2007 Just for clarity, then I will simply return to posting news links etc. on this. I NEVER stated, implied nor suggested in any way that Scott could be held responsible, directly or indirectly for this crime thru his associations and direct interactions with Brett, before or after this crime occurred. If you (esp Lucky) take time to re-read my posts you’ll find this to be true. What I was trying to convey is that as this investigation ramps up and begins to uncover facts and evidence and develop leads; any personal association with the parties of interest or suspects CAN and many times do, become objects of investigation themselves to further the case. These investigations of people by association can most certainly turn into nightmare scenarios for themselves as our history reflects for us in all too many instances. Add to the mix that were talking about gay barebacking here with very young gay models of pornography, coupled with prostitution at various levels (not Brett’s to my knowledge) past allegations of now dismissed charges of sex with a minor by the deceased who was stabbed 28 times, throat cut and then burned to an unrecognizable corpse, and all of this taking place in the wonderfully liberal and progressive Township of Dallas, Dallas, Pa. Here’s a photo of the police departments headquarters. http://home.epix.net/~dallastwppd/ Aunt Bea? My point is that you just don’t know what and how many competent/incompetent (based on experience only) police investigators are working this case. I can tell you with all the certainty and truth in the world that there are a number of websites and forum websites that are being monitored right now, and have been, since very early Friday morning simply looking for leads and information. Publicly announcing that you were personally engaged with the deceased and person of interest, just days before the killing and days after the killing, with a prime person of interest in that killing, as you have, highlights you as perhaps someone the authorities might want to learn more about. And when they then learn more about you and your “hobby” or means of support, for some, they are only challenged more into looking further and deeper into your life, because there are parallels. And they will do that to leave no stone unturned regardless of what the impact is to YOUR life. Not that you had anything to do with this crime, but the investigation process is like that. Nevertheless, at some point all the investigation becomes public record, whether thru court proceedings or simply public record. At that point everything is fair game, for anyone to pursue. Support or provide comfort to your friend privately, but why put yourself out there so publicly, and anyone else (by investigative default) that might be associated with you in your business as a client or other personal associations? That’s just what steams me about you…..about this.
Guest eastburbguy Posted January 31, 2007 Posted January 31, 2007 Frankly, rip, it's threads like this, with rants and raves like yours, that make me less likely to visit this forum. You're entitled to post whatever you like until the management shuts you up. Hopefully that will be soon. This murder is something of an "event" in certain circles, and some of us would like to see it discussed free from unnecessary and distracting vitriol. I guess what I'm trying to say, rip, is either get a life or go fuck yourself, but in any event SHUT UP!! < pausing, considering ... were my comments too "ungentlemanly"? hmmm ... no, I think I stand on them. }(
Guest Riptide Posted January 31, 2007 Posted January 31, 2007 >I guess what I'm trying to say, rip, is either get a life or >go fuck yourself, but in any event SHUT UP!! Impressive Eastburbguy..... So, even if I got a life and then fucked myself, as you have suggested, you still would not be happy. Perhaps you might want to offer me communion sometime.
Guest Funseeker22 Posted January 31, 2007 Posted January 31, 2007 >I have met murderers,I have met lots of psychopaths,I have met >tons of crazies,speed freeks,drunks and evil hustlers who have >hurt-killed johns. Townie, Are you speaking about the LA Hooville Group ?. Not us. Maybe the Palm Springs Crowd. ;-) Sorry to interject but couldn`t let this one go. ;)
Guest twinklover Posted January 31, 2007 Posted January 31, 2007 >I have met murderers,I have met lots of psychopaths,I >have met >>tons of crazies,speed freeks,drunks and evil hustlers who >have >>hurt-killed johns. Me too. But puleeze don't bring them to Montreal which will be my next getaway after the GayAvn and the Academy of Friends in San Francisco. I love my city for a lot of things but interesting boys is not one of them. I have yet to meet any cute young man named "Vincent" here. Not one. And the men are even more fucked up. I'm warning you Townsend San Francisco sucks. In particular, Craigslist's exotic services in San Francisco sucks. 95% of the time, just like gay.com. But here's the rub. There is 5% that's not "repulsive". Old-timers, this definition is for you--what I mean by not "repulsive" is they don't look like Jeremy Jordan Dawson--and I'm hoping someone out there is laughing hysterically and perhaps pissing their panties--look him up on Atkol if you're curious). I know a good portion of the 5% that are not repulsive. At least 5 are totally sweet and sexual. And 3 of the 5 are known escorts or porn stars. But I wouldn't and don't like the random odds of trying to find them.
