Review from a lady?

[caeron]

I'm fascinated that this has provoked such a response.

I found the review somewhat helpful.

As others pointed out, many of the gay reviews aren't very helpful, since I prefer top escorts. I read them, however, because it can tell me something useful about the escort, like how they treat their clients.

This review was no different. Parts of it were useful, parts weren't.

I would personally be quite surprised if large numbers of straight reviews came in. If they did, I'm sure it would be a relatively trivial matter to partition the site so people could read what they prefer.

It's just some data. Nothing more.

[BenjaminNicholas]

I wonder if this lady looked anything like this...

http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b181/xpl...itain_emily.jpg

BN

[Guest Riptide]

>I wonder if this lady looked anything like this...

Perhaps “this lady” looks no more or less freakish than what your clients look like Ben. Have you ever considered that? For an escort who claims to be a “First Class” and ALL about the client escort; to come here and disparage a “client” for whom he knows nothing about, only to get free linked advertising for himself in front of others for it, speaks volumes about your character and credibility.

Not that your history of disclosing client information to others has ever gone unnoticed, but one might expect an escort who makes his living from selling sex to others, might just be a bit more sensitive and respectful of the client base from which a review comes from, whether it be male or female. I’ve always thought that being a gossip, of which you are, and an escort, of which you are, combined, is a deadly mix of conflict of interest and client trust. Thanks for proving that point of thought to be correct here today Ben. Any escort, who elects to publicly disparage those who hire an escort and then reviews that personal escort experience for the greater good of those who hire escorts, should be considered a high risk hire. I personally would not hire you because I know your ego is bigger than your conscience and the character you seem to not have. You’ve provided that insight here today for all to see.

Perhaps you should consider confining your “attempt” at humor to your blog, where your credibility has always been in question and outing is simply an instrument that secures a new hit or two along the way, for you.

To: lgcastellanos2006, all gay men are NOT Hetero-Phobes and all gay male escorts are NOT assholes and publicity whores. Sadly, sometimes you run across them in life, and when you do, give them their 15 minutes, it’s all they’ll ever have in life, and just move on. At the end of the day, they will always need YOU more than YOU will ever need them.

[BenjaminNicholas]

All this venom from someone with only 3 posts to their name... Why am i not shocked by this? Coward.

My post was a light-hearted attempt to poke fun at the title of this very-long thread '...From a Lady.' An obvious referrence to the sketch comedy show Little Brittan, who has the pictured character always telling people 'I'M A LADY!'

It's quite funny. If you haven't seen the show, go pick up season one on DVD.

As for my blog: It remains more popular than ever, while my clientele continues to be pleased with the time we spend together. I'm EXTREMELY proud of both. Apologizing for finding success is something that i'll never, ever do.

Your character assassination attempt fell flat. Next time you might want to try putting a second gunman on the grassy knoll. *wink*

BN

[Guest PWIT]

>My post was a light-hearted attempt to poke fun at the title

>of this very-long thread '...From a Lady.' An obvious

>referrence to the sketch comedy show Little Brittan, who has

>the pictured character always telling people 'I'M A LADY!'

I am so proud of myself......I actually got this one! :+ Too often the jokes or references go over my head, but when I saw the pic I actually got this one! YIPPEE

BTW...BN, you avatar image gives me a boner!

[Guest ScottAdler]

>All this venom from someone with only 3 posts to their

>name...

>>Thanks Pookie Face, that was probably..no, it was the nicest thing

>>you have ever said about me online ever...Perhaps the New Year

>>has many unexpected moments such as this to enjoy....

A new incarnation it would appear ...

[Guest Riptide]

Before this thread turns into a late night drive home with Ted Kennedy, I’ll conclude my participation in it (with exception to anything new and relevant) with these remarks.

>My post was a light-hearted attempt to poke fun at the title

>of this very-long thread '...From a Lady.'

No it wasn’t Ben and no matter how much spit and spin you might attempt to put on it, it will clearly stand as your attempt to disparage a unique escort reviewer here in a campaign to be a condescending “whore” ie, prostitute, and get your linkage out there at the same time. Had it not been, your tactless comment placed above your posted pic of the drag queen, which related to the reviewer, would not have been “I wonder if this lady looked anything like this...It was clearly a cheap shot and meant to be belittling to the reviewer of which this thread is all about.

>An obvious referrence to the sketch comedy show Little Brittan, who has the pictured character always telling people 'I'M A LADY!'

It was as obvious and relevant to this thread as a star (not you Ben) in the northern night sky being a UFO attacking Hackensack, New Jersey to collect lesbians as a source of who we all are as people. You’ve already disparaged the escort reviewer here, are you now going for the intelligence of many of the readers of this site?

>It's quite funny. If you haven't seen the show, go pick up

>season one on DVD.

I’ll refrain here, from telling YOU where to pick up something and where you should go…..:-)

>As for my blog: It remains more popular than ever, while my

>clientele continues to be pleased with the time we spend

>together. I'm EXTREMELY proud of both. Apologizing for

>finding success is something that i'll never, ever do.

The fact is, Ben, you have not found success, at all. What you’ve found dear, is other people’s success in life, willing, capable and interested in paying you for sex. Don’t confuse the two. They are as obvious, well apparently obvious to you, as an episode of Little Britain; but they are not. That would be a huge mistake on your part, but “The Donald” can’t see that parallel either.

>Your character assassination attempt fell flat.

It’s interesting that you use such terminology in the face of this post. You must be worried about something Ben. That something, is usually, with you, being that of the truth. Assassination of you? Please don’t post yourself up as anyone worthy of that.

> Next time you might want to try putting a second gunman on the grassy knoll. *wink*

The next time you *wink* at me, I’ll remove ALL “secondary gunman” as you suggest from your fantasy as being that important, and being the “coward” of which I am, will meet you face to face for anything you might be interested in… 

Have a nice day!

[Guest twinklover]

What an amusing thread. The review and the escort's response (excerpts below) certainly contain relevant information, even if the review was from a woman. The reviewer even says she wanted us "men" to know what kind of an escort he was/is.

"Speaking of dead horses … NYC rates and specific escorts whose rates you don’t like … looks like you love saddling that one up and riding it for all you can get out of it whenever possible"

Pardon me but the issue of the outrageous fees demanded by some escorts is not a "dead horse." You may charge whateever you wish "pookie". You may try to justify it any way you want. The notion that all of your grooming, prep and gym time should be taken into account is so facetious. Who do you think you're kidding. If you get clients to pay those exceptional rates, that's your business and it's fine with me. But that does not preclude me from having an opinion about those rates and the escorts who charge them and expressing that opinion vigorously as a consumer of escort services.

Review: "Alex did not do what was agreed upon when we spoke on the phone. He did not kiss nor go down on me. He said he doesn't go down on women he doesn't know. When I asked him to slowdown, he would not listen. He only cared about his pleasure and completely disregarded mine. When he had finished he asked for his donation. I said to him, and you think you deserve it. Boy, I should've never said that, he went off, raising his voice and demanding his donation. I was frightened, gave him what was agreed and told him to leave.

Although it's been some time since my horrible encounter with Alex, I feel that you men should know what kind of an escort he is so that you don't go hiring him blindly the way I did. I had refrained from writing this review partly be cause I was too humiliated and wanted to forget about it. I feel sorry for the rest of the professionals (escorts) who know how to treat their clients with respect and dignity. It's human garbage like Alex that gives escorts a bad reputation."

Response: "thank you for giving me a chance to responde. i did see this lady on that date.i can only tell that most of the things she wrote are lies.i dont know if i have a way to prove it ,but you should understand that there is some people like this lady that think that if she is paying means she can do what ever she want.she was very hard lady ,i speak spanish and if you ask somebody to call and try my spanish. i did kiss her,i didnt go down on her because she smelled very bad down there. its very easy to write bad things about me .but if i was so bad .why did she spend 3 hours with me? i know i am not perfect ,but what she wrote is very far from what happened.

thank you!

Alex"

[BenjaminNicholas]

It took me a minute to realize who 'Riptide' really was...

The screename and writing style are a dead giveaway. I find it pretty cowardly that you can't write under your ORIGINAL screename or simply call me if you've got an issue with me. Anyone can see that you're taking a completely harmless issue and trying (messily) turn the tables on me. It's not working.

In the future, i'd be more judicious in picking a screename that's not so closely associated with one of your hobbies.

Benjamin

[TampaYankee]

The lady emailed a response to this thread and asked me to post it.

TY

Dear Sirs,

I just recently became aware that my review of Alex from Las Vegas was the focus of such controversy. My intention in writing his review was not to upset escorts nor their potential clients. I wrote the review because I wanted to make your subscribers aware that Alex has no intention of following through with what he has been hired to do. I wanted them to know what I went through and how rude, how indifferent and disrespectful he is to his clients. On Rentboy, there are 2 reviews for him. There is a review before mine made by a man from Michigan and it is also negative. Please look at it under Rentboyreviews.com Your readers should be made aware that Alex also has a review from someone with more credibility than me--a gay man. Perhaps if they know that someone more believable than me reviewed Alex, they'll see what a disappointment he is as an escort .

[Guest RR]

Wow, this tread continues to draw attention and a bitchy attitude. This board is really not for escorts and clients to go back and forth and attack each other! Things like this polute the board in my opinion and make it undesirable for those of us who use it to discuss issues that relate to our interests and community of hiring.

Can we all just put the BN thing to rest. I personally have nothing against him and as long as he is good to those he is with that is all that matters in my opinion.

Russianrob

[Guest epigonos]

The truth of the matter regarding the advisability of allowing women to submit reviews, of escorts, to be posted on this site is simply something about which many of us are going to have to agree to disagree. As I have already stated I personally don't like the idea BUT I can certainly live with it. If the site management decides to continue posting reviews by women so be it. Just PLEASE indicate right up top that the review is written by a woman so I don't waste my time reading it.

[Guest Riptide]

>Can we all just put the BN thing to rest. I personally have

>nothing against him and as long as he is good to those he is

>with that is all that matters in my opinion.

So then, in other words for you; it's ok to express and review how one feels about BN through the review process when someone is paying him and when he's sucking a clients cock, or getting fucked by that client, but it's not ok for one to come here and express here, in the same manner that a paying client might express, the many less than desirable aspects of who Benjamin Nicholas might be, through his own posted words, expressions and actions to another. Is that really what you are saying here? Because if it is, then you really need to go back to the days when gay men (YOU) had no voice at all when it came to pay for cock and it was at everyone's risk and expense to do so. Suddenly, it seems, whoever you really are, your mission is to take us back to the days when there was no information for the good as well as for the bad.

If you want this forum to welcome ALL people, and to be about ALL life forms, then get beyond your little safe playground of hiring reviewed escorts as being a guarantee of great sex and protection and get real with yourself. It ain't ever gonna be real for you.

The only thing that will ever be a guarantee in life is, that if you are paying someone to have sex with you...those that would never do so without payment, then you are and always will be the one who must REALIZE that and adjust your expectations to the same. If you are real about who you are, then your odds are greatly increased that you just might have an ok experience.

There is no escort in the world who wants to have sex with an old, fat, disgusting, out of shape, demanding client. Sex was always meant to be between two, three or four people who could not pry themselves away from one another. As a client you are never in that group, no matter how hard they might sell you emotionally that you are.

You might believe that you are buying sex, but over the long term, you're just buying buying delusion, which might just be ok with you today, but over time you'll see......

[Guest PWIT]

>You might believe that you are buying sex, but over the long

>term, you're just buying buying delusion, which might just be

>ok with you today, but over time you'll see......

so what are you buying riptide?

[Lucky]

My ass loves to be deluded!

[Guest Riptide]

>so what are you buying riptide?

Just the fax mam, just the fax. :-)

[Guest twinklover]

LOL. As someone who gets plenty of sex, paid and unpaid, let me just say that not all clients are fat, smelly, bald, aged, undesirable and "disgusting". Some are, one or more of these attributes, but many are not. You may ask why do others (the ones not fitting SA's "disgusting" profile), why do they hire? At least for one reason. I cannot think of a better response than one proferred by doug69: "I pay them to leave." Even my ex-boyfriend believes this justification and he's as cold-hearted as can be. It's true, some of us pay the escorts to leave. We do not wish to be involved with the escort.

[Guest PWIT]

OK..I get it now. You don't utilize the services of escorts, but yet you know all the facts and are willing to point them out to us. Thanks so much for sharing your expertise and knowledge. I am sure you are doing us all a great service and we are all going to better consumers for it.

[Guest Riptide]

>OK..I get it now.

Obviously, PWIT, you do not.

>You don't utilize the services of escorts

I never said that. You said that. Please don't go putting words in my mouth.

The point I was trying to make PWIT was this. You, and perhaps many others here, probably come to this site and others, to read about what others have to say and write about escorts and their sexual experiences with them. Most times, those writings are in the form of a review covering a paid encounter between the two or three of you. Although I would never review an escort of which I had hired (unless of course it was to alert others to a rip off or dangerous situation) (I just find it degrading to the escort to publicly "review" my sexual experience with him as if he were a piece of meat and the encounter a movie type accounting, which was made for everyone's generatic consumption and expectation) That's just me, but I do indeed see the value of it when one is shopping around for an escort to eliminate as many pit falls as possible. And I have no problems with reviewers sharing their experiences of that. Although sometimes, reading some reviews you might ask yourself why the client is even ingaging in sex based upon the content of the review. It's not uncommon PWIT to read reviews which blast an escort for being a liar or even a thief. "He walked in, took the money, attempted to jack me off and was gone in 20 minutes" "He said he kissed but told me when he didn't that he was in a relationship" "He said his cock was 8 inches but the closest thing in the room to the size of his cock was the light swith on the wall".... You get my point I'm sure. There's hundreds of these.

What I'm trying to say here PWIT is, you don't mind any of this type of expression or discetion of the escort when being mentioned within a review because it's about sex and what he did or did not do. Why do you get so jacked up over a poster here, when he expresses the same type of expression or disection over an escorts words based upon his own public postings and thoughts? You can learn as much, if not more sometimes, about who an escort really is through these type forums and what he says and how he responds within them.

In my mind, PWIT, you're only interested in getting what you want or need sexually from the escort and far less interested about who the escort really might be. And for me, that's just really sad. You might really want to try and give others the same ability to express themselves which is the same of those you so obviously rely upon for your hiring decisions. :-)

[Guest PWIT]

I am tempted to do a line by line analysis, but will restrict myself to a few points.

>>You don't utilize the services of escorts

>

>I never said that. You said that. Please don't go putting

>words in my mouth.

Yes I did make an assumption based on your previous 11 posts and you know what they say about assumptions. So I guess I am the ass on that one.

>The point I was trying to make PWIT was this. You, and perhaps

>many others here, probably come to this site and others, to

>read about what others have to say and write about escorts and

>their sexual experiences with them. Most times, those writings

>are in the form of a review covering a paid encounter between

>the two or three of you.

Yes, and from my understanding that is a prime purpose of these sites.

>In my mind, PWIT, you're only interested in getting what you

>want or need sexually from the escort and far less interested

>about who the escort really might be. And for me, that's just

>really sad.

Who is making assumptions about who now? And to tell on myself a bit, I find most of the escorts I have been with to be very fascinating people and many would say I may be too interested in who they 'really might be' as people.

Looking forward to your future escort recommendations, hiring advice, and posts in general.