OUTRAGEOUS behavior by"daddy"

[TownsendPLocke]

The "other site"is sooooo sloppy and the admins' so lazy that they"let slip by"the disclosure of someones alleged HIV status in a false review by a disgruntlled queen.this was the lame excuse posted today.

This is an outrage and proves that "the other site"is not concerned with anyones welfare-either clients or hookers and thus cannot be taken at all seriously.Further proving that they are just in it for the money.

>"When one has sex, one should always take in account the possibility that the partner is HIV positive and act accordingly. Anything less is taking unacceptable risks for both parties. Determining the actual status of a partner can only be done over a period of months with multiple tests.

It has always been my policy that HIV status is private information, and that disclosure must remain in the individuals hands at all times. In this case the comments were inadvertently published and have been withdrawn with my apologies.

The escort has definitively stated to me that it was untrue and that he has proof. I am willing to take his statement at face value.

Daddy"<

If hooking were legal I would love to sponser a lawsuit against the daddy and deej show.Maybe the 'scort in question will sue-but of course all the nasty bits would have to come out to be aired.

Sloppiness and laziness rule of at the site far far away.And they have the GALL to be snippy with their customers x(

[Guest Oliver]

TPL -

<...and you will please note the lack of any apology.<

> In this case the comments were inadvertently published and have been withdrawn with my apologies.

>Daddy"<

You did overlook that, right?

[TownsendPLocke]

Oliver thanks for pointing that out-in my fury I overlooked"daddy's"limp apology.This is the type of "apology one would expect for an incorrect digit in a phone number-not for something as outrageous as publishing an horrid accusation in a review by some pissy queen-that apperently went unchecked by the owners of the site.

I have edited my post to correct this.

[Buddy2]

T:

You have started many interesting discussions on this site. I really appreciate

your dedication and initiative. Can only speak for myself, but I am tired of discussions about Daddy's site or how bad Benjamin Nicholas is.

Unlike Escort Speak, MER has establsihed an independent identity. Is there some reason that you can not take your disagreements with Daddy to his site, not here? I am only speaking for myself. Perhaps I am a minority of one. This thread in particular is pointless because you can not identify the escort. I have no interest in searching Daddy's reviews to find what you are talking about.

Buddy

[Guest VoxPennae]

>

>T:

>

>You have started many interesting discussions on this site. I

>really appreciate

>your dedication and initiative. Can only speak for myself, but

>I am tired of discussions about Daddy's site or how bad

>Benjamin Nicholas is.

>

>Unlike Escort Speak, MER has establsihed an independent

>identity. Is there some reason that you can not take your

>disagreements with Daddy to his site, not here? I am only

>speaking for myself. Perhaps I am a minority of one. This

>thread in particular is pointless because you can not identify

>the escort. I have no interest in searching Daddy's reviews to

>find what you are talking about.

>

>Buddy

My sentiments exactly. Issues with other sites should be taken up with the management and posters on those sites.

[TownsendPLocke]

Sorry if you find certain rants of mine tiresome.Since this site is averaging 3 new posts a day I am just trying to keep things interesting.

And I don;t mean to sound pissy-but it will as there is no way around it-If you do not find my posts worthy of your time then it might be best not to read them.

As this site is about male escorts-I am going to discuss many things related to male escorts and that might involve mention of other sites if I find something worthyIMO.

Sweetness and light can be pretty boring after a while.Piss(whoo hoo)and vinegar can get boring also.My post tend to point out the very good and the very bad-what we used to call Orchids and Onions!

Of course if you two would like contribute more to the site I am sure we all would be happy. :+

[TampaYankee]

This was an unfortunate incident and unintentional IMO. Slip ups can happen . It's part of being human. I have had my own I'm sorry to say. The lesson we take from a lapse is to strengthen our resolve to exercise due diligence and discipline. I think Daddy's comments reflect that sentiment too. FWIW

TY

[marcanthony]

What's equally interesting to me is that the review is still up.

All of the information that is supposedly made up and patently false (with proof) has been taken down, but all the positive parts of the review remains.

That's interesting... because

1) Either the client was lying

or

2) The escort is lying.

If the client is lying, then why should we believe anything he has to say in the review, and why should parts of it stand?

If the escort is lying, why would we want a good review there to mislead us?

This all reminds of the great paradox... "I am lying to you now." Does that mean that I am lying or I am telling the truth? Ok, it's not really relevant, but it's fun to think about.

Anyway... since many posters on this board don't want references to the other site to dominate discussion... I ask the more general question:

If the admin has definite knowledge that part of a review is false, should he remove only that part, or take down the whole review?

[Guest comment]

>

>If the admin has definite knowledge that part of a review is

>false, should he remove only that part, or take down the whole

>review?

Your observation is right on the mark.

I don't see how any review would be left published, regardless of site, after parts have been determined to be fabricated.

[Guest twinklover]

Anything I may feel about the other site is usually stated on 'Escortspeak.com. My comments are usually directed exclusively to certain escorts I find unduly offensive and not toward managment of these sites. I appreciate Townsend's comments on this and other threads. You're absolutely right about the Valadon and other LA recommendations. I like you Townsend and hope you keep an even keel and are never intimidated by the shills who post here.

[Guest VoxPennae]

>Anything I may feel about the other site is usually stated on

>'Escortspeak.com. My comments are usually directed exclusively

>to certain escorts I find unduly offensive and not toward

>managment of these sites. I appreciate Townsend's comments on

>this and other threads. You're absolutely right about the

>Valadon and other LA recommendations. I like you Townsend and

>hope you keep an even keel and are never intimidated by the

>shills who post here.

I have never once stated that TPL should not post here nor do I feel that I have tried to intimidate in that regard. My feeling, and that of others, is simply issues with other sites should be taken up on those sites. I am slightly insulted by your insinuation.

[Guest StuCotts]

Dissemination of false information in a review is the worst kind of abuse the reviewing process can undergo, even if it's inadvertent, let alone if it's deliberate. So, it seems to me that a review found to be false in any particular should be taken down altogether, and the reviewer advised that his future submissions will at least be scrutinized ruthlessly, if not rejected out of hand. However harsh that might sound, anything less would send the wrong message to those who would undermine the system.

[KYTOP]

>I have never once stated that TPL should not post here nor do

>I feel that I have tried to intimidate in that regard. My

>feeling, and that of others, is simply issues with other sites

>should be taken up on those sites.

Since MANY people no longer feel welcome on the other site, even though they still read there, this has become a place for some of them to express their opinion. I personally don't have a problem with that especially since I can imagine what the reaction to anything close to negative would be there.

I still visit but rarely post there anymore. I've met several people and gotten even more e-mails from people that have moved on from the site, many have landed here.

[KYTOP]

> Can only speak for myself, but

>I am tired of discussions about Daddy's site or how bad

>Benjamin Nicholas is.

I think many say the same thing about all the people that fall all over their selves to constantly praise him. He gets much more praise than he does negative comments, mostly from the same people but more none the less. It is a site to discuss escorts so should BN be off limits? Since he campaigns to be America's best escort naturely he will come up in discussions.

As for posting about the other site see my other comment about people not feeling welcome there anymore.

[Buddy2]

>Of course if you two would like contribute more to the site I

>am sure we all would be happy. :+

You have contributed more to this site than I have. You win.

I have started a few threads, one called "Escorts as Best Friends" which was based on a review of Benjamin Nickolas The thread received many responses.

I believe I was successful in turning the client's review of Ben into a more universal concern.

I like you and enjoy reading your comments. However, we disagree strongly on

posting in this forum. I believe this site should pretty much stand on its own, with few references to the other site. You disagree.