Popular Post TotallyOz Posted November 6, 2016 Popular Post Posted November 6, 2016 One of the rules of our board is you cannot have 2 screen names. You also cannot use your screen names to constantly reek havoc. It is for this reason, we have banned the same person using multiple names. FossilGayFatRichardPrakanongWinaiLadygaygay Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out! paulsf, Moses, DivineMadman and 6 others 9 Quote
firecat69 Posted November 6, 2016 Posted November 6, 2016 Good Riddance to Bad Rubbish! TotallyOz, TMax and kokopelli 3 Quote
Guest Posted November 6, 2016 Posted November 6, 2016 Good decision, although I would say what was posted by the fossil gay handle warranted a ban on it's own, without even considering the multiple handles. I'm getting increasingly bored of all the fake profiles here. Some have multiple handles on the go at the same time. Another one resembles the reincarnation of Beachlover. Quote
TotallyOz Posted November 6, 2016 Author Posted November 6, 2016 I agree. I do not now, nor have I ever, seen the need to create multiple names. Seriously, why does someone bother to do this? Quote
Guest whall Posted November 6, 2016 Posted November 6, 2016 Some people have so much time on their hands. Get a hobby! Quote
Popular Post Alexx Posted November 7, 2016 Popular Post Posted November 7, 2016 I think creating multiple handles is clearly a sign of a mental disorder, especially when you use one handle to "Like" or even post favorable/supportive comments in response to posts you have written before yourself, under a different name. Quite creepy. biguyby, baobao, kokopelli and 2 others 5 Quote
Dalewood Posted November 7, 2016 Posted November 7, 2016 :sad:Leading with my chin here, I thought Prakanong had some sensible posts. vinapu, ChristianPFC and colmx 3 Quote
ct2005 Posted November 7, 2016 Posted November 7, 2016 I think creating multiple handles is clearly a sign of a mental disorder, especially when you use one handle to "Like" or even post favorable/supportive comments in response to posts you have written before yourself, under a different name. Quite creep. Do you mean Dissociative identity disorder (DID), aka multiple personality disorder (MPD)? With that ... we can argue that it could be a different person responding to the post made by the other personality. Quote
steveboy Posted November 7, 2016 Posted November 7, 2016 I think creating multiple handles is clearly a sign of a mental disorder, especially when you use one handle to "Like" or even post favorable/supportive comments in response to posts you have written before yourself, under a different name. Quite creepy. LOL! Five aliases surely made it easy for him to have always the last word! But is this worth the effort? Why not instead dedicate his time to five lovers? Quote
Guest ryanasia Posted November 7, 2016 Posted November 7, 2016 What about assholes that have only one name? Is my job in jeopardy? Quote
Guest abang1961 Posted November 7, 2016 Posted November 7, 2016 Thanks for eradicating FG. He was really a rather irritating person whom disliked and condemned almost everything I wrote... Quote
Guest abang1961 Posted November 7, 2016 Posted November 7, 2016 Thanks for eradicating FG. He was really a rather irritating person whom disliked and condemned almost everything I wrote... Suddenly I feel good again... Quote
colmx Posted November 7, 2016 Posted November 7, 2016 :sad:Leading with my chin here, I thought Prakanong had some sensible posts. Same here! I do hope that Scooby used some scientific method to identify the alleged hydra - beyond his scooby-smell! Quote
Guest Posted November 7, 2016 Posted November 7, 2016 :sad:Leading with my chin here, I thought Prakanong had some sensible posts. Really ? So you like to read one person having 5 different profiles and conversing with himself ? Or to be correct, 5 known different profiles. However many other unknown profiles there were is another question. Maybe some are still participating ? I think it makes sense to root out the fake posters and multiple IDs before all the genuine members get bored with a constant stream of fakes. Quote
Dalewood Posted November 8, 2016 Posted November 8, 2016 I only paid attention to the Prakanong alias. Quote
vinapu Posted November 10, 2016 Posted November 10, 2016 I agree. I do not now, nor have I ever, seen the need to create multiple names. Seriously, why does someone bother to do this? their Preparation H is not working perhaps Quote
Guest ronnie4you Posted November 14, 2016 Posted November 14, 2016 Am I the only one amused at Michael's post? Right under it he lists his previous screen name. So there's two names right there. BUT- take this lightly. I know why he changed it. I just found the juxtaposition amusing in this particular thread. Maybe it's a slow night. Quote
firecat69 Posted November 14, 2016 Posted November 14, 2016 Well rather then lay that out there for members who have not been around long enough to understand your post. Michael created the site and was the owner for many years. When he sold it he thought it was proper not to refer to himself as Gaythailand. Really one has nothing to do with the other! Up2u 1 Quote
Alexx Posted November 14, 2016 Posted November 14, 2016 Exactly, I think it's obvious that Michael's situation is quite unique in that regard. That really had nothing to do with tossers who use several handles at the same time AND even use their account B to concur with their account A and other such wanker games. Quote
Guest Posted November 14, 2016 Posted November 14, 2016 I agree entirely. In the circumstances, retiring one name linked to the board & starting a new one, without using both at the same time is a completely OK. Also, it's VERY different to holding down about 5 handles at the same time, all holding fake conversations with each other. No one wants to read such nonsense. Quote
Guest ryanasia Posted November 14, 2016 Posted November 14, 2016 Changing handles when you become the owner of the board is a no brainer. Quote
Guest ronnie4you Posted November 15, 2016 Posted November 15, 2016 Did someone suggest that Michael should not have changed names when he no longer owned the board? I must have missed that. Quote