Bob

The "kiss of life" posted by Khun Koko is probably the most meaningful for me but, alas, it's not really a kiss let alone a "gay" kiss; as such, I have no choice but to rapidly hone in on Khun FH's photo (post#32) which to me is simply stunning at several levels.....the eyes, lips of both, and my imagination following the right arm of the fellow on the left. My "like virginity" is no more.

Hmmm.....you blonde, Michael? You can get the yeast off a hooker on Beach Road. (I apologize in advance to those who haven't eaten dinner yet).

You bad, bad, boy. And, given I haven't had breakfast yet, I award one "like" point to the moderator. As for posting photos of one's penis, I won't be participating. Although my Mr. Happy is rather cute (well, I've always thought so!), I can't seem to get my camera to switch to the "macro" setting. P.S. In reality, I'm jealous. Try as I may, I simply can't seem to earn any well-deserved warning points. I never win anything.

Whether somebody for whatever reason is or isn't circumcized, who cares? I don't. In my view, the "anti-circumcision" people are just as dumb with their views (and alleged scientific backup) as are the "pro-circumcision" people. Those that view people who are circumcized as "mutilated" are just being silly with their language and reflecting their own personal attitudes (much like me when I was about 6 or 7 years old and saw my first uncircumcized man and thought his dick looked rather hideous).

Nah, the backdrop was worth a lot more and prettier than the painting!

I don't begrudge anybody paying whatever amount for anything but I simply can't get my head around why anybody would pay 75 million dollars for something that, to me, could have been produced by a 5 year old with no talent whatsoever. Makes them feel important to pay that kind of money or do they honestly get any substantial thrill looking/staring at a swatch of orange and blue? I just don't get it.....especially when I can think of much better uses for that kind of money.

Hate to resurrect old posts (I'm not BL, honest!) but I see another Rothko sold for $75.1 million. You can gander at this "lovely" work of "art" at this website: http://entertainment.time.com/2012/11/14/rothko-fetches-75-million-at-record-setting-sothebys-sale/?hpt=hp_c3 This event/sale only serves to add fuel to the notion that being rich substantially increases your chances of being stupid with your money. If "No. 1 Royal Red and Blue" is art, I'm Adonis.

Think we have to donate as he needs some new razor blades....

Okay, I'll bite. What's a freeze?

From (in August) Not the Nation: http://notthenation.com/2012/08/california-wow-owner-sentenced-to-10-years-of-non-stop-dance-music/ (Remember, this is not a REAL newspaper story)

Thanks, Khun FH. The real life story is similar to what I was imagining, hoping for, and fearing.

A rather neat photo but I'm wondering if you know the story behind it at all. Is this just an amorous event or, as I fear, is it a worker attempting to resuscitate a co-worker who has stopped breathing due to an electrical shock or whatever?

I've always stayed at the Wangcome Hotel. Convenient walk to the main drag (one block east) and night market (one block east, one south), and I'd note that one of the boy bars is directly (north) across the street. Somewhat of a tired but grand hotel but nice breakfast/cafe area and everyone's always been friendly there. Of course, make sure you visit the "wedding cake" temple (Wat Rong Khun, I believe) just south of town. Nothing like it anywhere else.

And working for me now using IE. Looks like they fixed it.

I never heard of it either. Some kind of cookie/sweet that's based on chocolate over a graham cracker?

I'm not sure why they can't replicate the issue. Just have them come to the site on either IE or Firefox (for me, it shows up just as GB depicts above on both of those browsers whereas the board shows rather normal with Google Chrome).

Well.....sorta. Obama won 26 states (plus DC) and about 62 million votes. Romney won 24 states and 58.7 million votes. Calling the election a landslide is a bit goofy in my view. And only considering the electoral college vote (which, by the way, hasn't happened yet) is a bit irrelevant to me. Consider that if a given candidate won 1 more vote in each of the states that awards all electoral votes to the winner, he/she would win the biggest "electoral college" landslide in history even though most of us might consider such a race as "razor thin" at best.

No need to apologize, Scooby, but glad somebody hopefully will straigten it out. As to what a "CSS" is, please don't tell me as I don't wanna know....

Okay....while the techies are getting their shirts ruffled....one more issue. Previously, when in a given forum, I'd read a post and then it would automatically mark itself "unread." It doesn't do that anymore and I have to open up that forum and click on the "mark this forum read" thingie ("thingie" is a new technical term). Whoever recently "updated" the board software, I'm sure your intentions were good in spite of the fact you simply screwed up the board. I'm hopeful that your techie work is not a sideline to your main job of writing code for launching nuclear weapons....

Michael, damn, kinda makes me proud! Now, with my toy sack brimming over with warning points, you all might want to look under the tree for something special this Christmas. And, if you don't see a massive quantity of warning points, perhaps Khun TW's doggy will leave an equally delicious morsel or two. As my first gesture, I award 1 million of my warning points to the bonehead on another website (which will go nameless although it's initials are appropriately BS) who called everybody an idiot and said he was sure Romney would win by a "landslide." His board name there was "Mumbles" there or something like that and I presume he's still mumbling to himself.

I've had the same problem here in CM with True for a couple of years but what's weird is that I can occasionally get into the SWD website (like I just did 10 minutes ago for the first time in a couple of weeks). I'm not so sure True is blocking it but I'm thinking that it's some type of incompatibility problem. Hell if I know.

Seeing somebody else's comment, I switched to Google Chrome and it's sorta normal now.

Ok, looks like at least one other thread about the issue and it's not only me. Following somebody's suggestion, I closed out Firefox and IE and am not using Google Chrome to get here.....and it sorta looks normal (actually, normal other than the ugly black areas to the left and right of the page).

Well, glad I'm not alone (it's not beyond me to unknowlingly screw up something but sounds like we're have the same problems). Hope Scooby or some techie can fix it as I don't even want to try to read the board in this format. (thanks in advance to whoever comes to the rescue)

For whatever reason, the form of this Forum radically changed for me several days ago....now the top log is covers only about 60% of the page, and then the form is a series of blue headings and black print, all difficult to follow. I have no clue what I did and thought maybe I unknowlingly changed something or it's all screwed up because I use IE. But I just came here with Firefox and it's identically screwed up. Is there some button or way for me to change the style here (I sure as hell can't find it). Help...and I'll owe ya 5 baht.