GB, I agree with you 100%.
I think a star system would be misleading and useless. A much more useful "barometer" are the narrative reports on the board provided by patrons. The narrative reports allow for detailed descriptions of what the author has seen and experienced.
These "bar attributes" are too subjective and cannot be easily quantified. A star system would be to simplistic. An example of this is the issue of a clean bathroom. Not everyone has the same standards when calling something "clean." Your clean may well be my dirty.
And then there is the issue of stars. How many stars? 5? 50? 100? How about half stars? Maybe quarter stars? In each category, what is the definition of a star? of 2 stars? 2.25 stars? 34 stars?
Finally, GB (as usual) raises an excellent point. "There are also too many people, and we've seen these kinds of posts before, who have something against certain bars and are not above telling others how terrible it is even if it isn't." This jaded, slanted reporting does a disservice to both the members of the board and the bars that are maligned.
IMHO