Riobard

Line up those Sardinians into a tin and make me an offer to roll back the top cover.

Interesting development. I found the rides exhilarating.

This is a universally understood heuristic by now. A lot of sites of any source contain fakery.

Canadian Men’s 4 x 100m sprint relay team. Not referring to a prospective 5-some fantasy, as they don’t compete for our sexual edification. However, it was for me the best moment, first in class first in show, in fact officially less than a minute of absolute awe.

If one were to simply subscribe to Bangkok Post this article could be scrolled past or selected according to interest or taste. That’s how most peopIe typically approach newscasts.

You don’t need to be trained in law to determine in a few seconds that a surviving spouse, according to the legislation, whether cohabiting or separated, has the statutory right of inheritance. Divorced status would necessitate a different adjudication process. The summary presented above appears to be a standard hierarchy of succession based on blood relation. I haven’t drilled down but I assume that surviving spouse trumps any allocation in the context of otherwise missing specificity.

If anybody really wants to support the board admin to safely and legally conduct the site, I suggest using developmentally appropriate language when referring to men eliciting admiration, as opposed to creepy terms that otherwise stereotype adult MSM preferring to distance from pedophilic labelling. Additionally, doing excited backflips over only having to pay a few bucks for sexual favours abroad simply reinforces the aforementioned stereotype. What naysayer won’t spin it as exploitation of socially & economically disadvantaged youth? Apart from that, insults directed at trade abounding, “don’t dish it out if you … (get the drift)”

Not that a Bard academic with Polonius-grade mega-influencer multilingual broad-reach articles would blogger to cursos any other member.🤔 If u r 2 rprt, 4 1 thng, use ur wrds. Thnx 4 12s or bakr 12s (13) o’ 🤣😂

Interim Exec summary: OP goes to Espaço Lagoa. Nice guy. Humbly makes inquiries. Doesn’t demean workers with the label “boy”. Oodles of previous board info on the subject. What could be more real in terms of the lack of an accurate answer than the existence of decades of Groundhog Day threads in which the answer is elusive. Punter’s been to Colombia once or twice, Brazil a handful of times. Apparently makes him an expert on comparing quality and presentation of men within same region based on nationality. Castigates Colombians. Purports to possess the bottom line of objective factual data on SoAmer transactional sex. Trashes escort subgroups while withholding evidentiary receipts regarding same. Digs his heels in when called out. Doesn’t like perspective challenged. Can’t wrap his head around scientific logic. Sound familiar in ‘24? Centred out simply for representation of distorted info. It’s a small clustered group of chaps that live to shape reality meeting their needs. Not doing everyone a favour. Yes, please please please, guys that similarly distort info to spin narrative give him backing. That’s a central function of chat rooms. But why just 2 or 3? A reasonably equal number pose a contrary recollection of experience. So sue us. Thanks for the laughs. I know for sure I’m not the only amused geezer here. Frankly, do what you want, write what you want, choose who you want if they accept you back and pay them whatever. No skin off my teeth. I have nothing to gain one way or another. I haven’t had a bad hiring experience over 10 years of Colombia and Brazil travel. My sole warning is manipulated news. If I had written that the input was not reflective of everybody’s reality and their experiences with escorts I’d have received an equal flimsy drubbing for not expanding. That’s the way the board crumbles.

I needed an image break from Politwinks. Appreciated.

Might have flown better without the foetal X-ray.

Oh just let Earth receive her Queen already.

Oh OK, good, he didn’t double down on happiness expressivity quirks. He thinks fast on his feet.

Wheeeee! All emoticons count for overall reputation category upticks. I’ll take the gringo’s 10 and claim the deal was 20. I’m far less generous. Watch out for the own net, emojifiers.

I hope that Walz doesn’t explicitly refer to the laugh part. It’s also exaggeration. Trump’s niece has attempted to explain it as idiosyncratic but related to family dynamics. Don’t go there, Tim. Bad, very bad. Settle down. You’ve made your point. Family dynamics and intergenerational expressivity style are just that; hands off. It risks isomorphic bullying and opens up retaliatory criticism of normative vulnerabities. Let Mary’s and Gwen’s spilled beans lie, m’kay?

Sympathy is awarded as punitive damages, but predictable incoherence can infect the magnitude of allocation of it in unpredictable ways. The most potent reference points as anchoring effect for sympathy in this case are USA assassination history along with the blessing of survival that would impel humility for most, and a present worse off contextual comparator, namely the tragic death of an innocent rally attendee, the chap that got in the way of a bullet meant for bottled blonde. The latter is quickly forgotten. A savvy person could have subsequently started presentations with a sobering moment of silence, anchoring the prospect of toned down rhetoric, and an average person would not seem disingenuous doing so. Paradoxically, would distract from the mere ear scratch while upgrading existential damages evocative of relatable identification sympatico, underscoring the debt everybody pays. Just a few seconds at every mic. A ploy squandered. Too late now. Sure, some of us would rush to the vomitorium (popular misconception I know) but that’s beside the point.

* That’s steam&sauna as opposed to field&stream.

… with Metro bus fare (vid 25 seconds) RPReplay_Final1723325156.mov

Liked him as Robert Ford and of course the devastatingly sad ManchesterBtS. If you can locate the heartbreaking World to Come (2020), prolly on Crave or Starz, you’ll see him again in the type of role tailored for him, though more a supporting one.

May this be any more precise catastrophic scene representation that occurs regarding His Wormwort. Watership Down! Watership Down!

No reflection on you and I think you are sharing to be hospitable more than being in any way incompetent, but I must have missed the loopy analytical part (not yours) where the $18 dollar guy who could possibly have upsell-attempted but was in a panic about his missing locker key, combined with the $27 dollar guy that already stated his usual $54 fee yet did (shockingly!) attempt an upsell supports anything but the logical probability that a low-rate-agreement guy is no less inclined compared to a higher end rate one to attempt upsell. This language should be relatable to those whining about failure to understand yet going in endless circles about fees. Just go up-Topic and see the endless navel-gazing and bot-like repetition about one of the most boring features of our hobby. Again the only way to support the claim that a higher-rate guy is more out to manipulate is for punters too cheap to attempt it sufficiently to gather trends objectively to actually do it. They won’t; ignorance trumps illumination but you can only lead a lame horse to water. In an ideal world without influence-grasping trollification, best to position actual data as opposed to delusional assumptions against the concrete experiences of punters here that have observed no connection between provider rate and performance or finagling. —- For those many intelligent readers here it’s not lost on me how much a few silly punters will go to the mat and use rudeness to subvert truth to save a few bucks. I’m quite aware a few dollars makes no difference in the grander scheme of things. Why do I do this, should you ask? It’s quite linked to my career and is quick and easy. I just hate misinformation, abject failures among punter groups to relay correctly, and I made quite a lucrative living countering bullsh*t.

Viagra toxicity alert! Somebody call the FDA. Some poor bargain basement pharm discount PDE5i-addicted sad sack doesn’t grasp that self-pleasuring by normal people is by definition inadvertently mental.

You obviously grasp that an unsolicited lecture may pop on to the podium. By now it should be common knowledge that this prompter is what is seen whether or not entered. Bugs is, after all, the higher life form.

And yours in the lightweight filing cabinet under this.